Division 4: 21 Participants

Discussion of computer chess matches and engine tournaments.

Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw

Which Of These Engines Have the Highest chance to Win the Division 4?

Poll ended at Thu Apr 12, 2007 6:35 pm

Xpdnt
1
4%
Eeyore
1
4%
AliChess
2
9%
Ayito
6
26%
Buzz
3
13%
Rotor
1
4%
Rotor
1
4%
Little thought
3
13%
Natwarlal
0
No votes
Sage
0
No votes
Other
5
22%
 
Total votes: 23

Jan Brouwer
Posts: 201
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 7:12 pm
Location: Netherlands

Re: Division 4: 21 Participants

Post by Jan Brouwer »

Hi Swami,

The performance of Rotor (my chess program) is a bit disappointing (to say the least) :cry:.
Can you provide some more information about games of Rotor, for example does it lose games on time, or perhaps some log files are available?

Thanks
User avatar
Graham Banks
Posts: 41739
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
Location: Auckland, NZ

Re: Division 4: 21 Participants

Post by Graham Banks »

Jan Brouwer wrote:Hi Swami,

The performance of Rotor (my chess program) is a bit disappointing (to say the least) :cry:.
Can you provide some more information about games of Rotor, for example does it lose games on time, or perhaps some log files are available?

Thanks
There's obviously a problem there because Rotor shouldn't finish with 0/40.
Tony Thomas

Re: Division 4: 21 Participants

Post by Tony Thomas »

Graham Banks wrote:
Jan Brouwer wrote:Hi Swami,

The performance of Rotor (my chess program) is a bit disappointing (to say the least) :cry:.
Can you provide some more information about games of Rotor, for example does it lose games on time, or perhaps some log files are available?

Thanks
There's obviously a problem there because Rotor shouldn't finish with 0/40.
You all got that right, here is the result of Rotor at the same time control.

Code: Select all

5 Rotor 0.1a                : 2224   58 (+ 47,=  2,-  9), 82.8 %

Bestia 0.90                   :   1 (+  0,=  0,-  1),  0.0 %
BigLion 2.23w                 :   2 (+  1,=  1,-  0), 75.0 %
Bearded_06_29                 :   1 (+  1,=  0,-  0), 100.0 %
Atak 4.99 Linka               :   1 (+  0,=  0,-  1),  0.0 %
Tscp 1.81                     :   1 (+  1,=  0,-  0), 100.0 %
Prophet 2.0 Epsilon           :   1 (+  1,=  0,-  0), 100.0 %
Matheus 2.3                   :   1 (+  1,=  0,-  0), 100.0 %
Gullydeckel 2.15. pI10        :   1 (+  0,=  0,-  1),  0.0 %
Alex 1.78                     :   1 (+  1,=  0,-  0), 100.0 %
Alf 1.06                      :   1 (+  0,=  0,-  1),  0.0 %
Smash 1.03                    :   1 (+  1,=  0,-  0), 100.0 %
IACH 0.56E                    :   1 (+  1,=  0,-  0), 100.0 %
BBChess 0.99b                 :   1 (+  1,=  0,-  0), 100.0 %
BibiChess 0.5                 :   1 (+  1,=  0,-  0), 100.0 %
LittleThought 0.98            :   1 (+  1,=  0,-  0), 100.0 %
BlackBishop 0.47              :   1 (+  1,=  0,-  0), 100.0 %
Cilian 4.14se                 :   1 (+  1,=  0,-  0), 100.0 %
King' s Out 0.2.42            :   1 (+  1,=  0,-  0), 100.0 %
Matant 5.01                   :   1 (+  1,=  0,-  0), 100.0 %
Eden 0.0.11                   :   1 (+  1,=  0,-  0), 100.0 %
Hoichess-0.7.0                :   1 (+  1,=  0,-  0), 100.0 %
Chess-Rikus 1.466             :   1 (+  1,=  0,-  0), 100.0 %
Surprise 4.2.8                :   1 (+  1,=  0,-  0), 100.0 %
Eveann 1.60                   :   1 (+  1,=  0,-  0), 100.0 %
FireFly 2.13                  :   1 (+  0,=  0,-  1),  0.0 %
Marvin 1.3.0                  :   1 (+  0,=  0,-  1),  0.0 %
Ssechess 2.05DC               :   1 (+  1,=  0,-  0), 100.0 %
Gerbil 02                     :   1 (+  1,=  0,-  0), 100.0 %
Roque 1.1                     :   1 (+  1,=  0,-  0), 100.0 %
Nero 6.1                      :   1 (+  1,=  0,-  0), 100.0 %
FreeChess 2.16e               :   1 (+  0,=  0,-  1),  0.0 %
Roce 0.0350                   :   1 (+  1,=  0,-  0), 100.0 %
Adamant 1.7                   :   1 (+  1,=  0,-  0), 100.0 %
J.S.BAM 0.52                  :   1 (+  1,=  0,-  0), 100.0 %
Damas7c                       :   1 (+  1,=  0,-  0), 100.0 %
RDchess 3.23                  :   1 (+  1,=  0,-  0), 100.0 %
Marquis 0.1.5                 :   1 (+  1,=  0,-  0), 100.0 %
Jan Willem 1.13               :   1 (+  1,=  0,-  0), 100.0 %
Milady 2.1                    :   1 (+  1,=  0,-  0), 100.0 %
Amundsen 0.55                 :   1 (+  1,=  0,-  0), 100.0 %
Enigma 1.1.4                  :   1 (+  1,=  0,-  0), 100.0 %
Laurifer 1.0                  :   1 (+  0,=  0,-  1),  0.0 %
Mizar 3.0                     :   1 (+  1,=  0,-  0), 100.0 %
Elf 1.30                      :   1 (+  1,=  0,-  0), 100.0 %
MiniChessAI 1.19              :   1 (+  1,=  0,-  0), 100.0 %
Hokus-Pokus 0.6.3             :   1 (+  1,=  0,-  0), 100.0 %
Lime 6.3                      :   1 (+  1,=  0,-  0), 100.0 %
Clueless 1.3b                 :   1 (+  1,=  0,-  0), 100.0 %
Beaches 2.2                   :   1 (+  1,=  0,-  0), 100.0 %
Eagle 0.7.5                   :   1 (+  1,=  0,-  0), 100.0 %
Warrior 1.0.3                 :   1 (+  1,=  0,-  0), 100.0 %
Dimitri 1.32 beta 4           :   1 (+  1,=  0,-  0), 100.0 %
Mustang 3.0                   :   1 (+  1,=  0,-  0), 100.0 %
Rival 1.14                    :   1 (+  1,=  0,-  0), 100.0 %
GreKo 5.05                    :   1 (+  0,=  0,-  1),  0.0 %
Now 0.1y beta 2               :   1 (+  1,=  0,-  0), 100.0 %
Feuerstein 0.4.5 beta 2       :   1 (+  0,=  1,-  0), 50.0 %
swami
Posts: 6647
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 4:21 am

Re: Division 4: 21 Participants

Post by swami »

Jan Brouwer wrote:Hi Swami,

The performance of Rotor (my chess program) is a bit disappointing (to say the least) :cry:.
Can you provide some more information about games of Rotor, for example does it lose games on time, or perhaps some log files are available?

Thanks
Hi Jan,

I don't know what was wrong with Rotor,maybe I didn't set it up correctly ,it was the only engine to encounter such a terrible setup or play style in my tournament,for its strength.

I can say one thing right: That is I just set it up like how i set up other engines in Arena,Add it as a UCI engine and run the tournament with Sedat's PGN since Rotor supports all that,If you want a PGN or log files,please provide me your mail address,I can send them to you.
Thanks.
Jan Brouwer
Posts: 201
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 7:12 pm
Location: Netherlands

Re: Division 4: 21 Participants

Post by Jan Brouwer »

Hi Swami,

I sent you my email address per private message.
swami
Posts: 6647
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 4:21 am

Re: Division 4: 21 Participants

Post by swami »

Thanks Jan for asking me the question as to why Rotor hadn't got any points,Rotor as UCI is now playing the tournament again with the engines in same division.
swami
Posts: 6647
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 4:21 am

Re: Division 4: 21 Participants

Post by swami »

Code: Select all

 Engine             Score   Ro
01: Rotor 0.1          25.0/40 ·· 
02: Xpdnt_061120       2.0/2   11 
03: Natwarlal          1.5/2   1= 
03: AliUci408          1.5/2   1= 
05: BlackBishop        1.0/2   01 
05: Popochin           1.0/2   10 
05: Prophet-2-intel    1.0/2   10 
05: Sage22a            1.0/2   10 
05: Tornado_1_0_mainz  1.0/2   10 
05: Gnuchess4TM        1.0/2   == 
05: Mediocre 0.31      1.0/2   10 
05: Eeyore             1.0/2   10 
13: Matant32MB         0.5/2   0= 
13: Ayito 0.2.994      0.5/2   =0 
13: NanoSzachy         0.5/2   =0 
13: WJChess            0.5/2   =0 
17: LittleThought-1.00 0.0/2   00 
17: Eveann             0.0/2   00 
17: Buzz               0.0/2   00 
17: Monarch(v1.7)      0.0/2   00 
17: Lime_v62           0.0/2   00 
swami
Posts: 6647
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 4:21 am

Re: Division 4: 21 Participants

Post by swami »

Engines that got promoted to Division 3

Ayito 29.5
Xpdnt 29.5
Natwarlal 28
Popochin 27.5
Eeyore 25
Rotor 25

6 engines get promoted because Rotor and Eeyore have equal number of points.