Top Engines are still too materialistic they need the what is statement

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw

Chessqueen
Posts: 5578
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2018 2:16 am
Location: Moving
Full name: Jorge Picado

Re: Top Engines are still too materialistic they need the what is statement

Post by Chessqueen »

Jim Logan wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 9:01 pm Try Crystal 150121, or SugaR AI ICCF 1.90. Both of them solve this quite quickly.
Can you please post the output or PV :?: are those two engines available for the Public and if so where are the Links to download them :?:
Do NOT worry and be happy, we all live a short life :roll:
Chessqueen
Posts: 5578
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2018 2:16 am
Location: Moving
Full name: Jorge Picado

Re: Top Engines are still too materialistic they need the if else then statement

Post by Chessqueen »

Spliffjiffer wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 12:12 pm the modern nets "prunned this knowledge away" imo....u can look eg for older nets by Sergio...eg: "20200724-1240.bin"
it will solve this puzzle instantly as well as Gusev's 24.Qxe5 for example...the nets that SF currently uses are peaked on the basis of playing-strength currently and are not designed to solve puzzles....u can find all nnue nets by Sergio here if u like to test it:
https://www.comp.nus.edu.sg/~sergio-v/nnue/
Sorry that I forgot to clarify the use of the if else logic sequence, but not the C++ programming code, which could follow this logic if Ba4+ ==>( Kxa4==> b3+ Kb5==>c4+==>Kc6==>d5+==>Kd7==>e6+ either Kxd8 else Kc8 or Ke8) then f5 = 1/2. :

or if (condition1) {
// block of code to be executed if condition1 is true
} else if (condition2) {
// block of code to be executed if the condition1 is false and condition2 is true
} else {
// block of code to be executed if the condition1 is false and condition2 is false
} then {
// block of code to be executed if the condition of the expected moves are executed giving a draw result 1/2

Of course this is just the logic but NOT the C++ programming code. The point is the top engines should always look for sacrificing material and check for further consequence of that sacrifice instead of of being too materialistic NOT to give material away in losing positions. :roll

[pgn][Event "Computer chess game"]
[Site "MININT-UB2PIMJ"]
[Date "2021.04.20"]
[Round "?"]
[White "ChessQueen"]
[Black "Stockfish_13_win_x64_bmi2 [001]"]
[Result "*"]
[BlackElo "2000"]
[Time "05:54:05"]
[WhiteElo "34750"]
[TimeControl "13200+1"]
[SetUp "1"]
[FEN "3B4/1r2p3/r2p1p2/bkp1P1p1/1p1P1PPp/p1P1K2P/PPB5/8 w - - 0 1"]
[Termination "unterminated"]
[PlyCount "11"]
[WhiteType "human"]
[BlackType "program"]

1. Ba4+ Kxa4 {(Kxa4) +15.06/25 1} 2. b3+ Kb5 {(Kb5 c4+ Kc6 exf6 cxd4+ Kf3
exf6 Bxf6 gxf4 g5 Bb6 g6 d3 Bxh4 d2 Ke2 Rg7 Kxd2 f3 Kd3 Rxg6 Ke4 f2 Bxf2
Bxf2 h4 Rg1 Kf3 Bb6 Kf4 Ra1) +15.80/25 0} 3. c4+ Kc6 {(Kc6) +16.13/25} 4.
d5+ Kd7 {(Kd7 exf6 gxf4+ Ke4 exf6 Bxf6 Bd8 g5 Bxf6 gxf6 Ra8 Kxf4 Rg8 f7 Rf8
Kg4 Rxf7 Kg5 Rf2 Kg6 Rxa2 Kf5 Rb2 Kg4 Rxb3 Kf5 a2 Kg4) +16.94/25 0} 5. e6+
Kxd8 {(Kxd8 f5) +12.62/49 13} 6. f5 *
[/quote][/pgn]
Last edited by Chessqueen on Wed Apr 21, 2021 1:24 am, edited 12 times in total.
Do NOT worry and be happy, we all live a short life :roll:
User avatar
cc2150dx
Posts: 325
Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2013 9:51 am
Location: Canada
Full name: Jason Coombs

Re: Top Engines are still too materialistic they need the what is statement

Post by cc2150dx »

Chessqueen wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 11:49 pm
Jim Logan wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 9:01 pm Try Crystal 150121, or SugaR AI ICCF 1.90. Both of them solve this quite quickly.
Can you please post the output or PV :?: are those two engines available for the Public and if so where are the Links to download them :?:
More info here http://www.talkchess.com/forum3/viewtop ... =2&t=76318 on Crystal
Jim Logan
Posts: 72
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 4:14 am
Location: Nevada, USA

Re: Top Engines are still too materialistic they need the what is statement

Post by Jim Logan »

Madeleine Birchfield
Posts: 512
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2020 4:29 pm
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Full name: Madeleine Birchfield

Re: Top Engines are still too materialistic they need the what is statement

Post by Madeleine Birchfield »

Chessqueen has a habit of posting on talkchess about not knowing how to use specific engines or analysis programs. Today it is Stockfish derivatives such as Crystal and Sugar, a few days ago it is the recently released Igel 3.0. They ought to do some research by themselves before asking the community, especially when the same question is asked each time, only about a different engine.
Chessqueen
Posts: 5578
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2018 2:16 am
Location: Moving
Full name: Jorge Picado

Re: Top Engines are still too materialistic they need the what is statement

Post by Chessqueen »

Madeleine Birchfield wrote: Thu Apr 22, 2021 3:22 am Chessqueen has a habit of posting on talkchess about not knowing how to use specific engines or analysis programs. Today it is Stockfish derivatives such as Crystal and Sugar, a few days ago it is the recently released Igel 3.0. They ought to do some research by themselves before asking the community, especially when the same question is asked each time, only about a different engine.
I have no problem with Stockfish derivatives such as Crystal and sugar, I just simply saying that none of them could could my puzzle in +M7, therefore the outcome is no different than Stockfish 13 NNUE, and as for Igel 3.0 it is working just fine on my intel i7 4770 3.40 GHz. Please stop throwing wood into my fire unless you want me to go to sleep as happy as a Baby :roll: :lol:
Do NOT worry and be happy, we all live a short life :roll:
Chessqueen
Posts: 5578
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2018 2:16 am
Location: Moving
Full name: Jorge Picado

Re: Top Engines are still too materialistic they need the what is statement

Post by Chessqueen »

Chessqueen wrote: Fri Apr 23, 2021 2:17 am
Madeleine Birchfield wrote: Thu Apr 22, 2021 3:22 am Chessqueen has a habit of posting on talkchess about not knowing how to use specific engines or analysis programs. Today it is Stockfish derivatives such as Crystal and Sugar, a few days ago it is the recently released Igel 3.0. They ought to do some research by themselves before asking the community, especially when the same question is asked each time, only about a different engine.
I have no problem with Stockfish derivatives such as Crystal and sugar, I just simply said that none of them could solved my puzzle in +M7, therefore, the outcome is no different than Stockfish 13 NNUE, and as for Igel 3.0 it is working just fine on my intel i7 4770 3.40 GHz. Please stop throwing wood into my fire unless you want me to go to sleep as happy as a Baby :roll: :lol:


Note: As you can see Igel 3.00 does NOT have any issues with my computer :roll:

[pgn][Event "Computer chess game"]
[Site "MININT-UB2PIMJ"]
[Date "2021.04.22"]
[Round "1"]
[White "Igel 3.0.0 64 BMI2 AVX2"]
[Black "Ethereal 12.75 (PEXT)"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[BlackElo "3475"]
[ECO "B22"]
[Opening "Sicilian"]
[Time "21:28:30"]
[Variation "Alapin, 2...Nf6 3.e5 Nd5"]
[WhiteElo "3475"]
[TimeControl "600+1"]
[PlyCount "112"]
[WhiteType "program"]
[BlackType "program"]

1. e4 c5 2. c3 Nf6 3. e5 Nd5 4. Bc4 Nb6 5. Bb3 c4 6. Bc2 d6 7. exd6 Qxd6 8.
Qe2 Nc6 9. Na3 Ne5 10. Nb5 Qc5 11. a4 a6 12. Nd4 Nd3+ 13. Bxd3 cxd3 14.
Qxd3 e5 15. Ndf3 f6 16. Qe4 Qc6 17. Qxc6+ bxc6 18. a5 Nd5 19. d4 exd4 20.
Nxd4 c5 21. Nde2 Bd6 22. Nf3 Bf5 23. O-O O-O-O 24. Rd1 Bc7 25. Ng3 Bg6 26.
h4 Rhe8 27. h5 Bf7 28. h6 g6 29. Nf1 Kb7 30. Be3 Kc6 31. b4 Nxc3 32. Rxd8
Rxd8 33. Bxc5 Ne2+ 34. Kh1 Rd5 35. g3 Rh5+ 36. Kg2 Be6 37. N1h2 Bh3+ 38.
Kh1 Be6 39. Ra3 Bd6 40. Re3 Bd5 41. Bxd6 Kxd6 42. Rd3 Nc1 43. Rd2 Na2 44.
g4 Re5 45. Kg2 Nxb4 46. Kg3 Re6 47. g5 f5 48. Ng1 Kc7 49. Ne2 Rc6 50. Rd4
Rc4 51. Nf3 Rxd4 52. Nfxd4 Kd6 53. Nf4 Bf7 54. Kf3 Ke5 55. Ke3 Kd6 56. Kf3
Ke5 1/2-1/2[/pgn]
Do NOT worry and be happy, we all live a short life :roll: