I have a lot of respect for CCRL, but, IMO, it is a bad choice to include Fat Fritz 2 on the list. It is trivial to release Stockfish derivatives that would flood rating lists and make them totally meaningless. Very disappointing to see. I understand there is some nuance about deciding what engines to include, and which to not include on a list - but it's totally clear this is a very minor delta to Stockfish dev.
Fat Fritz 2
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 568
- Joined: Tue Dec 12, 2006 10:10 am
- Full name: Gary Linscott
Re: Fat Fritz 2
-
- Posts: 508
- Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2010 7:23 am
Re: Fat Fritz 2
If it's clear then why do others disagree? Fair question.gladius wrote: ↑Sun Feb 14, 2021 1:00 amI have a lot of respect for CCRL, but, IMO, it is a bad choice to include Fat Fritz 2 on the list. It is trivial to release Stockfish derivatives that would flood rating lists and make them totally meaningless. Very disappointing to see. I understand there is some nuance about deciding what engines to include, and which to not include on a list - but it's totally clear this is a very minor delta to Stockfish dev.
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Sat Feb 22, 2020 6:43 pm
- Full name: Leif Aronsson
Re: Fat Fritz 2
WHo disagrees apart from those persons with commercial intrest in this scam from CB??
It should at least clearly be called Stockfish and not Fat Frits on the list.. the engine is Stockfish and NOTHING else.. Just a specifik network..
-
- Posts: 1631
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 7:52 pm
- Full name: Dietrich Kappe
Re: Fat Fritz 2
For those that say that FF2 is “just” a net and doesn’t add anything, can you provide some chess examples of where that’s true?
Fat Titz by Stockfish, the engine with the bodaciously big net. Remember: size matters. If you want to learn more about this engine just google for "Fat Titz".
-
- Posts: 41429
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
- Location: Auckland, NZ
Re: Fat Fritz 2
For those interested, I'm running a Fat Fritz 2 64-bit 8CPU v Stockfish 2021-02-11 64-bit 8CPU match at 2 hours with 30 second increments.
Details are in the tournament sub-forum.
Details are in the tournament sub-forum.
gbanksnz at gmail.com
-
- Posts: 447
- Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 3:13 am
- Location: Holland, MI
- Full name: Martin W
Re: Fat Fritz 2
An example would consist of analysis of SF-dev (with its default net) juxtaposed with SF-dev (with the FF2 net). Can you provide some chess examples where it's not true?dkappe wrote: ↑Sun Feb 14, 2021 1:38 amFor those that say that FF2 is “just” a net and doesn’t add anything, can you provide some chess examples of where that’s true?
-
- Posts: 1631
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 7:52 pm
- Full name: Dietrich Kappe
Re: Fat Fritz 2
Sorry. I don’t have a copy of FF2 so can’t speak to the chess side of things. It would be foolish of me to make claims in that regard without first hand evidence.gaard wrote: ↑Sun Feb 14, 2021 1:44 amAn example would consist of analysis of SF-dev (with its default net) juxtaposed with SF-dev (with the FF2 net). Can you provide some chess examples where it's not true?dkappe wrote: ↑Sun Feb 14, 2021 1:38 amFor those that say that FF2 is “just” a net and doesn’t add anything, can you provide some chess examples of where that’s true?
Fat Titz by Stockfish, the engine with the bodaciously big net. Remember: size matters. If you want to learn more about this engine just google for "Fat Titz".
-
- Posts: 512
- Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2020 4:29 pm
- Location: Dublin, Ireland
- Full name: Madeleine Birchfield
Re: Fat Fritz 2
This is coming from the same ratings list that has the stockfish clones Houdini 6 and Fire 7.1 listed as separate from Stockfish, and regular Fat Fritz listed separate from Leela, so listing Fat Fritz 2 as separate from Stockfish is simply on par to their previous behaviour.gladius wrote: ↑Sun Feb 14, 2021 1:00 am I have a lot of respect for CCRL, but, IMO, it is a bad choice to include Fat Fritz 2 on the list. It is trivial to release Stockfish derivatives that would flood rating lists and make them totally meaningless. Very disappointing to see. I understand there is some nuance about deciding what engines to include, and which to not include on a list - but it's totally clear this is a very minor delta to Stockfish dev.
-
- Posts: 447
- Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 3:13 am
- Location: Holland, MI
- Full name: Martin W
Re: Fat Fritz 2
You don't have a copy of the net either?dkappe wrote: ↑Sun Feb 14, 2021 1:48 amSorry. I don’t have a copy of FF2 so can’t speak to the chess side of things. It would be foolish of me to make claims in that regard without first hand evidence.gaard wrote: ↑Sun Feb 14, 2021 1:44 amAn example would consist of analysis of SF-dev (with its default net) juxtaposed with SF-dev (with the FF2 net). Can you provide some chess examples where it's not true?dkappe wrote: ↑Sun Feb 14, 2021 1:38 amFor those that say that FF2 is “just” a net and doesn’t add anything, can you provide some chess examples of where that’s true?
-
- Posts: 1631
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 7:52 pm
- Full name: Dietrich Kappe
Re: Fat Fritz 2
I don’t do Windows and most of the chessbase software is Windows based. (I may have an ancient copy of chessbase for Windows NT somewhere.) I’ve restricted my comments to the GPL as I can’t speak to how FF2 plays or whether it would be worth X $ to someone. I somehow assumed that you had a copy, given your confident statements about how strong or weak FF2 was.
Fat Titz by Stockfish, the engine with the bodaciously big net. Remember: size matters. If you want to learn more about this engine just google for "Fat Titz".