I got a result for the new net (using 60 for slowmover) vs SF 11 of 2 wins, 1 loss, 17 draws at 2' + 1" on seven threads. Small sample, but at least they are in the same ballpark.
I got a result for the new net (using 60 for slowmover) vs SF 11 of 2 wins, 1 loss, 17 draws at 2' + 1" on seven threads. Small sample, but at least they are in the same ballpark.
An overnight testrun (230 games) of the gk1-net with slowmover 60 gave 41% vs SF 11 (3'+1'', singlethread) (cl1-net was clearly weaker (37%)). Not bad! Now, i will try some slowmover-settings (50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100). We have to be sure about the best slowmover-setting for the future, here.
Sorry but I can not support this engine in any way. It is not user friendly. When I try and load it in Infinity GUI it stops responding and crashes after few moves when still in book..
Damir wrote: ↑Mon Jun 22, 2020 8:02 pm
Sorry but I can not support this engine in any way. It is not user friendly. When I try and load it in Infinity GUI it stops responding and crashes after few moves when still in book..
JohnS wrote: ↑Fri Jun 26, 2020 7:32 am
Trying to understand this but not much luck so far.
I run sf-nnue run (halfkp-256x2-32-32) x64-bmi2 from the command line and then used
go depth 20
The engine just stopped after some time without any output, is this expected.
Suggestion - allow nn.bin to be in same directory as the exe, this seems simpler to me for using the engine.
What happens if nn.bin is missing, is it just normal stockfish.
Put the net in "eval" folder under the folder of the engine, or change the EvalDir parameter.
Also you need to send an
isready
command
for the engine to load the eval file.