Tom's game analyzer does not work with as many formats. But the graph feature is nice,Guenther wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2020 9:27 amThe two points above exist already in Toms Game Analyser and it even has a GUI and eval graphs.
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=66554&p=750330&hili ... er#p750330
viewtopic.php?t=62066&highlight=game+analyser
MRI - Match Result Inspector
Moderators: hgm, Dann Corbit, Harvey Williamson
Forum rules
This textbox is used to restore diagrams posted with the [d] tag before the upgrade.
This textbox is used to restore diagrams posted with the [d] tag before the upgrade.
-
- Posts: 12143
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 7:57 pm
- Location: Redmond, WA USA
- Contact:
Re: MRI - Match Result Inspector
Taking ideas is not a vice, it is a virtue. We have another word for this. It is called learning.
But sharing ideas is an even greater virtue. We have another word for this. It is called teaching.
But sharing ideas is an even greater virtue. We have another word for this. It is called teaching.
- Guenther
- Posts: 3939
- Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 4:33 am
- Location: Regensburg, Germany
- Full name: Guenther Simon
- Contact:
Re: MRI - Match Result Inspector
It does easily with wb/banksia/cutechess/cute-cli/arena pgns with simple regex one second search+ replace.Dann Corbit wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2020 5:22 pmTom's game analyzer does not work with as many formats. But the graph feature is nice,Guenther wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2020 9:27 amThe two points above exist already in Toms Game Analyser and it even has a GUI and eval graphs.
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=66554&p=750330&hili ... er#p750330
viewtopic.php?t=62066&highlight=game+analyser
(only CB and probably ChessGUI pgn would require a little bit more work)
https://rwbc-chess.de
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... KSptBx9AUs
Troll barometer:'chessqueen' 2018-present, aka: 'George' 2013-2016, 'pichy' 2006-2013, 'Jorge Pichard' 2000-2006 (old forum)
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... KSptBx9AUs
-
- Posts: 12143
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 7:57 pm
- Location: Redmond, WA USA
- Contact:
Re: MRI - Match Result Inspector
It sounds convenient unless you have 500 files you want to process.Guenther wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2020 5:56 pmIt does easily with wb/banksia/cutechess/cute-cli/arena pgns with simple regex one second search+ replace.Dann Corbit wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2020 5:22 pmTom's game analyzer does not work with as many formats. But the graph feature is nice,Guenther wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2020 9:27 amThe two points above exist already in Toms Game Analyser and it even has a GUI and eval graphs.
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=66554&p=750330&hili ... er#p750330
viewtopic.php?t=62066&highlight=game+analyser
(only CB and probably ChessGUI pgn would require a little bit more work)
Taking ideas is not a vice, it is a virtue. We have another word for this. It is called learning.
But sharing ideas is an even greater virtue. We have another word for this. It is called teaching.
But sharing ideas is an even greater virtue. We have another word for this. It is called teaching.
Re: MRI - Match Result Inspector
Does Score Drop detect drops in more than 1 ply? I wanted to be able to set the ply window to detect the drop.
- Guenther
- Posts: 3939
- Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 4:33 am
- Location: Regensburg, Germany
- Full name: Guenther Simon
- Contact:
Re: MRI - Match Result Inspector
https://rwbc-chess.de
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... KSptBx9AUs
Troll barometer:'chessqueen' 2018-present, aka: 'George' 2013-2016, 'pichy' 2006-2013, 'Jorge Pichard' 2000-2006 (old forum)
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... KSptBx9AUs
Re: MRI - Match Result Inspector
UPDATE
Match SF11 vs Lc0 (various versions) taken from "fastgm" 16 cpu tournament, 2500 games.
http://rebel13.nl/output.htm
Main change, added EPD in html and in files.
PGN''s and EPD's attached.
I guess this addresses most of the raised issues for the moment.
Interesting to see Stockfish being superior in the mid-game while Lc0 is on par in the endgame, I expected it the other way around. Ha! what do I know about computer chess.
Match SF11 vs Lc0 (various versions) taken from "fastgm" 16 cpu tournament, 2500 games.
http://rebel13.nl/output.htm
Main change, added EPD in html and in files.
Code: Select all
Processed games : 2500 All.epd : 38
Suspect_openings.pgn : 1 Suspect_openings.epd : 1
Crazy_games.pgn : 9 Crazy_games.epd : 9
Possible_missed_wins.pgn: 20 Possible_missed_wins.epd: 20
Drop_in_score.pgn : 8 Drop_in_score.epd : 8
Lost_games.pgn : 0 Lost_games.epd : 0
I guess this addresses most of the raised issues for the moment.
Interesting to see Stockfish being superior in the mid-game while Lc0 is on par in the endgame, I expected it the other way around. Ha! what do I know about computer chess.
90% of coding is debugging, the other 10% is writing bugs.
Re: MRI - Match Result Inspector
Even Stockfish has bugs.Guenther wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2020 9:47 amIt is impossible for me to reproduce that incredible score with SF8.Code: Select all
115... Nc2 +9.92/29
Neither with 5men Syzygy nor with no TBS at all. The score is always between 0.17 and 0.33 for all depths up to 60.
90% of coding is debugging, the other 10% is writing bugs.
Re: MRI - Match Result Inspector
[Event "CCRL 40/15"]
[Site "CCRL"]
[Date "2020.01.19"]
[Round "703.2.691"]
[White "Komodo 13.2.5 MCTS 64-bit"]
[Black "Stockfish 11 64-bit"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[ECO "B06"]
[Opening "Robatsch defence"]
[PlyCount "148"]
[WhiteElo "3282"]
[BlackElo "3432"]
1. e4 {+0.00/1 0s} g6 {+0.00/1 0s} 2. d4 {+0.00/1 0s} Bg7 {+0.00/1 0s} 3. Nc3
{+0.00/1 0s} c6 {+0.00/1 0s} 4. Be3 {+0.00/1 0s} Qb6 {+0.00/1 0s} 5. Qd2
{+0.73/13 34s} Qxb2 {(d6) -0.07/28 37s} 6. Rb1 {(Rb1) +0.28/11 24s} Qa3 {(Qa3)
+0.00/28 19s} 7. h4 {(Nf3) +0.39/11 34s} h5 {(Nf6) +0.10/27 44s} 8. e5 {(e5)
---------
Can someone tell me which interface produces this kind of PGN?
And about the move comment:
6. Rb1 {(Rb1) +0.28/11 24s}
7. h4 {(Nf3) +0.39/11 34s}
What does the move (Rb1 / Nf3) mean in the move comment?
[Site "CCRL"]
[Date "2020.01.19"]
[Round "703.2.691"]
[White "Komodo 13.2.5 MCTS 64-bit"]
[Black "Stockfish 11 64-bit"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[ECO "B06"]
[Opening "Robatsch defence"]
[PlyCount "148"]
[WhiteElo "3282"]
[BlackElo "3432"]
1. e4 {+0.00/1 0s} g6 {+0.00/1 0s} 2. d4 {+0.00/1 0s} Bg7 {+0.00/1 0s} 3. Nc3
{+0.00/1 0s} c6 {+0.00/1 0s} 4. Be3 {+0.00/1 0s} Qb6 {+0.00/1 0s} 5. Qd2
{+0.73/13 34s} Qxb2 {(d6) -0.07/28 37s} 6. Rb1 {(Rb1) +0.28/11 24s} Qa3 {(Qa3)
+0.00/28 19s} 7. h4 {(Nf3) +0.39/11 34s} h5 {(Nf6) +0.10/27 44s} 8. e5 {(e5)
---------
Can someone tell me which interface produces this kind of PGN?
And about the move comment:
6. Rb1 {(Rb1) +0.28/11 24s}
7. h4 {(Nf3) +0.39/11 34s}
What does the move (Rb1 / Nf3) mean in the move comment?
90% of coding is debugging, the other 10% is writing bugs.
- Guenther
- Posts: 3939
- Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 4:33 am
- Location: Regensburg, Germany
- Full name: Guenther Simon
- Contact:
Re: MRI - Match Result Inspector
Of course, but we don't know, if it was an SF bug in this case.Rebel wrote: ↑Thu Feb 13, 2020 3:19 pmEven Stockfish has bugs.Guenther wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2020 9:47 amIt is impossible for me to reproduce that incredible score with SF8.Code: Select all
115... Nc2 +9.92/29
Neither with 5men Syzygy nor with no TBS at all. The score is always between 0.17 and 0.33 for all depths up to 60.
Anyhow, you adressed the point given and renamed that category to 'possible missed win' I see ;-)
https://rwbc-chess.de
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... KSptBx9AUs
Troll barometer:'chessqueen' 2018-present, aka: 'George' 2013-2016, 'pichy' 2006-2013, 'Jorge Pichard' 2000-2006 (old forum)
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... KSptBx9AUs
Re: MRI - Match Result Inspector
The alternative would be cutechess, unlikely.Guenther wrote: ↑Thu Feb 13, 2020 4:25 pmOf course, but we don't know, if it was an SF bug in this case.Rebel wrote: ↑Thu Feb 13, 2020 3:19 pmEven Stockfish has bugs.Guenther wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2020 9:47 amIt is impossible for me to reproduce that incredible score with SF8.Code: Select all
115... Nc2 +9.92/29
Neither with 5men Syzygy nor with no TBS at all. The score is always between 0.17 and 0.33 for all depths up to 60.
Sure, I asked for feedbackAnyhow, you adressed the point given and renamed that category to 'possible missed win' I see![]()

90% of coding is debugging, the other 10% is writing bugs.