Hi all lc0 users
Do upgrade to the new lc0 v0.23-rc1.
Its giving greatly improved speed and performance.
My speed using the sergio NNs almost doubled !
It should be good for the other NNs too.
Regards
New lc0 v0.23-rc1 VERY FAST
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 1339
- Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 9:43 am
- Location: New Delhi, India
New lc0 v0.23-rc1 VERY FAST
i7 5960X @ 4.1 Ghz, 64 GB G.Skill RipJaws RAM, Twin Asus ROG Strix OC 11 GB Geforce 2080 Tis
-
- Posts: 2645
- Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2010 10:18 pm
- Location: Hamburg, Germany
- Full name: Srdja Matovic
Re: New lc0 v0.23-rc1 VERY FAST
Common, numbers please
--
Srdja
-
- Posts: 177
- Joined: Wed May 23, 2018 9:29 pm
Re: New lc0 v0.23-rc1 VERY FAST
It should be neither faster nor slower, but there are reports for both.
Being slower is more plausible (e.g. due to bugs, not optimized code etc), but most likely it's just either different weights file or different settings (e.g. you have lc0.config near v0.22).
Being slower is more plausible (e.g. due to bugs, not optimized code etc), but most likely it's just either different weights file or different settings (e.g. you have lc0.config near v0.22).
-
- Posts: 3657
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2015 11:41 am
- Location: hungary
Re: New lc0 v0.23-rc1 VERY FAST
As I saw the main difference is in time management.crem wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:46 am It should be neither faster nor slower, but there are reports for both.
Being slower is more plausible (e.g. due to bugs, not optimized code etc), but most likely it's just either different weights file or different settings (e.g. you have lc0.config near v0.22).
-
- Posts: 3657
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2015 11:41 am
- Location: hungary
Re: New lc0 v0.23-rc1 VERY FAST
I made some speed test with this dev version:
Params:
setoption name backend value cudnn-fp16
setoption name nncachesize value 5000000
go nodes 10000000
Others are Default
GPU 1 x RTX2060 OC
Net 42872
Results:
lc0 v0.22.0 max nps = 28.7 kN/s (Depth 19, Nodes 9.8 MN)
lc0 v0.23-rc1 max nps = 23.7 kN/s (Depth 19, Nodes 9.7 MN)
So rc1 is rather slower than lc0 v0.22.0
Note
The source of rc1 contains some bugs.
Params:
setoption name backend value cudnn-fp16
setoption name nncachesize value 5000000
go nodes 10000000
Others are Default
GPU 1 x RTX2060 OC
Net 42872
Results:
lc0 v0.22.0 max nps = 28.7 kN/s (Depth 19, Nodes 9.8 MN)
lc0 v0.23-rc1 max nps = 23.7 kN/s (Depth 19, Nodes 9.7 MN)
So rc1 is rather slower than lc0 v0.22.0
Note
The source of rc1 contains some bugs.
-
- Posts: 177
- Joined: Wed May 23, 2018 9:29 pm
Re: New lc0 v0.23-rc1 VERY FAST
It's a known bug (for few hours already). When there is no ucinewgame or position befor go command, v0.23 starts counting time from the engine start, while v0.22 starts timer at go command. So it's not a real nps drop, just timer started too early.corres wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:09 pm I made some speed test with this dev version:
Params:
setoption name backend value cudnn-fp16
setoption name nncachesize value 5000000
go nodes 10000000
Others are Default
GPU 1 x RTX2060 OC
Net 42872
Results:
lc0 v0.22.0 max nps = 28.7 kN/s (Depth 19, Nodes 9.8 MN)
lc0 v0.23-rc1 max nps = 23.7 kN/s (Depth 19, Nodes 9.7 MN)
So rc1 is rather slower than lc0 v0.22.0
Note
The source of rc1 contains some bugs.
That will be fixed in RC2.
-
- Posts: 3657
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2015 11:41 am
- Location: hungary
Re: New lc0 v0.23-rc1 VERY FAST
Thanks.crem wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2019 10:21 pmIt's a known bug (for few hours already). When there is no ucinewgame or position befor go command, v0.23 starts counting time from the engine start, while v0.22 starts timer at go command. So it's not a real nps drop, just timer started too early.corres wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:09 pm I made some speed test with this dev version:
Params:
setoption name backend value cudnn-fp16
setoption name nncachesize value 5000000
go nodes 10000000
Others are Default
GPU 1 x RTX2060 OC
Net 42872
Results:
lc0 v0.22.0 max nps = 28.7 kN/s (Depth 19, Nodes 9.8 MN)
lc0 v0.23-rc1 max nps = 23.7 kN/s (Depth 19, Nodes 9.7 MN)
So rc1 is rather slower than lc0 v0.22.0
Note
The source of rc1 contains some bugs.
That will be fixed in RC2.
I am waiting for.
-
- Posts: 4556
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 4:30 am
Re: New lc0 v0.23-rc1 VERY FAST
Does "RC1" stand for "Release Candidate"? Because with my experience as Beta tester, I'd advice people to avoid RCs like the plague, and wait until the actual release, because the most bugs tend to hide in them. Unless you're wanting to beta test it yourself.
-
- Posts: 2727
- Joined: Wed May 12, 2010 10:00 pm
Re: New lc0 v0.23-rc1 VERY FAST
"New option --logit-q (UCI: LogitQ). Changes subtree selection algorithm a bit, possibly making it stronger (experimental, default off)."
Any more information on this new option? I will test this to see if works in any meaningful way.
"The worst thing that can happen to a forum is a running wild attacking moderator(HGM) who is not corrected by the community." - Ed Schröder
But my words like silent raindrops fell. And echoed in the wells of silence.
But my words like silent raindrops fell. And echoed in the wells of silence.
-
- Posts: 1339
- Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 9:43 am
- Location: New Delhi, India
Re: New lc0 v0.23-rc1 VERY FAST
Thanks.
I switched back to v0.22 after all the uproar, but I wasn't having any real problems with v0.23 RC-1, except for a few crashes which I ascribed to some Hardware tweaks I was doing at the same time.
Anyway, do let me know the Results of your Test.
i7 5960X @ 4.1 Ghz, 64 GB G.Skill RipJaws RAM, Twin Asus ROG Strix OC 11 GB Geforce 2080 Tis