Hard to say with out more benchmarks but less than twice. Maybe 70% faster...Nordlandia wrote: ↑Sun Oct 27, 2019 3:23 pm Roughly speaking how many times is i9-10980XE faster than i7-5960X ?
First chess benchmarks for the Intel core i9-10980XE emerge
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 919
- Joined: Sat May 31, 2014 8:28 am
Re: First chess benchmarks for the Intel core i9-10980XE emerge
Only 2 defining forces have ever offered to die for you.....Jesus Christ and the American Soldier. One died for your soul, the other for your freedom.
-
- Posts: 1563
- Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2009 10:47 am
- Location: Almere, The Netherlands
Re: First chess benchmarks for the Intel core i9-10980XE emerge
You can do really nice things with BMI2 especially PEXT/PDEP but if you are not a programmer it probably doesn't matter.
I've been looking at all the leaks and most of the benchmarks were synthetic like 3DMark and Cinebench. They were done with totally different GPU's, so you can't really compare things this way.
I already have two of these X299 mainboards with 3 year old chipsets and outdated design with no upgrade path, for me it is just a matter of swapping CPU's, and maybe adding more and faster memory.
-
- Posts: 1563
- Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2009 10:47 am
- Location: Almere, The Netherlands
Re: First chess benchmarks for the Intel core i9-10980XE emerge
In some other thread we talked about the i7-5960X performance before. I also have a 5960X at 4 GHz. on an Asus X99 deluxe, it does on the stockfish bench a little bit below 20 mnps, if the leaked benchmark of the 10980XE is true and it really does 60 mnps it is 3 times as fast. I guess we have to wait until it is actually released to get an impression of the true performance, often these leaks are just fake.Nordlandia wrote: ↑Sun Oct 27, 2019 3:23 pm Roughly speaking how many times is i9-10980XE faster than i7-5960X ?
-
- Posts: 1563
- Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2009 10:47 am
- Location: Almere, The Netherlands
Re: First chess benchmarks for the Intel core i9-10980XE emerge
You must be joking.Zenmastur wrote: ↑Sun Oct 27, 2019 4:09 pmHard to say with out more benchmarks but less than twice. Maybe 70% faster...Nordlandia wrote: ↑Sun Oct 27, 2019 3:23 pm Roughly speaking how many times is i9-10980XE faster than i7-5960X ?
-
- Posts: 919
- Joined: Sat May 31, 2014 8:28 am
Re: First chess benchmarks for the Intel core i9-10980XE emerge
How does GPU performance affect CPU performance? I thought it was the other way around. So, I don't understand this comment.Joost Buijs wrote: ↑Sun Oct 27, 2019 5:23 pmYou can do really nice things with BMI2 especially PEXT/PDEP but if you are not a programmer it probably doesn't matter.
I've been looking at all the leaks and most of the benchmarks were synthetic like 3DMark and Cinebench. They were done with totally different GPU's, so you can't really compare things this way.
Then it may makes sense for you to perform a drop in upgrade assuming your MB vendors offer an upgraded bios for your particular motherboards, and, assuming that the new bios doesn't gimp the CPU too much. Or else a new MB will be in order.I already have two of these X299 mainboards with 3 year old chipsets and outdated design with no upgrade path, for me it is just a matter of swapping CPU's, and maybe adding more and faster memory.
It certainly changes the equation for anyone that doesn't happen to own X299 motherboards as they will have to buy a dead end motherboard to support these CPU's.
While the leaked benchmarks will not be perfect they should be close enough for most purposes.Joost Buijs wrote: ↑Sun Oct 27, 2019 6:17 pmIn some other thread we talked about the i7-5960X performance before. I also have a 5960X at 4 GHz. on an Asus X99 deluxe, it does on the stockfish bench a little bit below 20 mnps, if the leaked benchmark of the 10980XE is true and it really does 60 mnps it is 3 times as fast. I guess we have to wait until it is actually released to get an impression of the true performance, often these leaks are just fake.Nordlandia wrote: ↑Sun Oct 27, 2019 3:23 pm Roughly speaking how many times is i9-10980XE faster than i7-5960X ?
The numbers I gave are for a general purpose benchmark. i.e. non-chess specific. The numbers given for the 9980XE were used as surrogates for the 10980XE since comparisons between the two show the 10980XE is slightly slower. The numbers where 29494 for the 9980XE vice 15993 for the 5960X. That's what I based my statements on.
Only 2 defining forces have ever offered to die for you.....Jesus Christ and the American Soldier. One died for your soul, the other for your freedom.
-
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2014 10:11 pm
Re: First chess benchmarks for the Intel core i9-10980XE emerge
So the point flew right over your head?Joost Buijs wrote: ↑Sun Oct 27, 2019 5:23 pm You can do really nice things with BMI2 especially PEXT/PDEP but if you are not a programmer it probably doesn't matter.
Use the fastest executable for the platform, or you are a wanker with an agenda.
-
- Posts: 1563
- Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2009 10:47 am
- Location: Almere, The Netherlands
Re: First chess benchmarks for the Intel core i9-10980XE emerge
Cinebench and 3DMark are 3D graphical benchmarks, don't you think that the GPU has influence on that as well?
I don't know what you mean by 'numbers' but the 9980XE is at least 2 times as fast as the 5960X.Zenmastur wrote: ↑Sun Oct 27, 2019 3:12 pm
The numbers I gave are for a general purpose benchmark. i.e. non-chess specific. The numbers given for the 9980XE were used as surrogates for the 10980XE since comparisons between the two show the 10980XE is slightly slower. The numbers where 29494 for the 9980XE vice 15993 for the 5960X. That's what I based my statements on.
Like I already said before we have to wait until both the AMD 3950X and the Intel 10980XE are truly available to make a real comparison, numbers based on leaks with 'engineering samples' are not very reliable to say the least.
And now I will stop with this endless discussion.
-
- Posts: 1080
- Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2016 6:55 pm
- Location: USA/Minnesota
- Full name: Leo Anger
Re: First chess benchmarks for the Intel core i9-10980XE emerge
Techpowerup quote:
"18 cores, the i9-10980XE is ahead of the 12-core Ryzen 9 3900X in rendering and simulation tests, although not by much (for a chip that has 50% more cores). This is probably attributed to the competing AMD chip being able to sustain higher all-core boost clock speeds. In tests that not only scale with cores, but are also hungry for memory bandwidth, such as 7-zip and Media, Intel extends its lead thanks to its quad-channel memory interface that's able to feed its cores with datasets faster."
"18 cores, the i9-10980XE is ahead of the 12-core Ryzen 9 3900X in rendering and simulation tests, although not by much (for a chip that has 50% more cores). This is probably attributed to the competing AMD chip being able to sustain higher all-core boost clock speeds. In tests that not only scale with cores, but are also hungry for memory bandwidth, such as 7-zip and Media, Intel extends its lead thanks to its quad-channel memory interface that's able to feed its cores with datasets faster."
Advanced Micro Devices fan.
-
- Posts: 919
- Joined: Sat May 31, 2014 8:28 am
Re: First chess benchmarks for the Intel core i9-10980XE emerge
“Graphical benchmarks”, to use your words, are meant to measure graphics card performance not CPU performance. You posted a link to a CPU benchmark. The two are even remotely similar. And to answer your question, NO, I don't think which GPU is used will have any affect on the CPU performance if the test is done properly.Joost Buijs wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2019 6:49 amCinebench and 3DMark are 3D graphical benchmarks, don't you think that the GPU has influence on that as well?
Zenmastur wrote: ↑Sun Oct 27, 2019 3:12 pm
The numbers I gave are for a general purpose benchmark. i.e. non-chess specific. The numbers given for the 9980XE were used as surrogates for the 10980XE since comparisons between the two show the 10980XE is slightly slower. The numbers where 29494 for the 9980XE vice 15993 for the 5960X. That's what I based my statements on.
I guess that depends on the application, which is exactly why they bother doing benchmarks in the first place.I don't know what you mean by 'numbers' but the 9980XE is at least 2 times as fast as the 5960X.
You were the one that posted the leaked benchmark. You certainly seemed to think it had some significance or why bother posting it. As soon as I posted a comparison benchmark they both suddenly lost their significance. What do you suppose caused that?Like I already said before we have to wait until both the AMD 3950X and the Intel 10980XE are truly available to make a real comparison, numbers based on leaks with 'engineering samples' are not very reliable to say the least.
As far as endless discussions go this seems to be a rather short one! But, I agree that there isn't much to be had by continuing this conversation.And now I will stop with this endless discussion.
Regards,
Zenmastur
Only 2 defining forces have ever offered to die for you.....Jesus Christ and the American Soldier. One died for your soul, the other for your freedom.
-
- Posts: 2645
- Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2010 10:18 pm
- Location: Hamburg, Germany
- Full name: Srdja Matovic
Re: First chess benchmarks for the Intel core i9-10980XE emerge
Hehe, looks like AMD is really back, people are starting good old flame wars again
--
Srdja
--
Srdja