ICGA - Rybka<>Fruit, Shredder, Komodo, Chiron
Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2019 1:03 pm
Computer Chess Club
https://talkchess.com/
Hmm, imo this belongs to the EO subforum.Rebel wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2019 1:03 pm viewtopic.php?f=10&t=72066
I think this post belongs in the main forum, certainly the ICGA part.
General subforum's description: Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.smatovic wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2019 2:04 pmHmm, imo this belongs to the EO subforum.Rebel wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2019 1:03 pm viewtopic.php?f=10&t=72066
I think this post belongs in the main forum, certainly the ICGA part.
Simply create a poll on this topic, then you will see how people think about EO.Ovyron wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2019 3:12 pmGeneral subforum's description: Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.smatovic wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2019 2:04 pmHmm, imo this belongs to the EO subforum.Rebel wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2019 1:03 pm viewtopic.php?f=10&t=72066
I think this post belongs in the main forum, certainly the ICGA part.
Until they change the description it's clear the EO subforum has outlived its usefulness and now it's an obstacle to "discussion relating to chess playing software and machines", as people aren't going to monitor EO just to see what happens with Rebel's thread.
I don't believe in anonymous cowards that vote on polls without stating why they think the way they do on a post, or that report posts to be moved to EO without showing their faces. They have already won the battle by convincing Sam Hull that the current state of censorship is fine (nobody interested about engine origins can find this info on Google), and with at least 2 moderators on their side all this is moot.
Your comment “what Vas has done” indicates an acceptance it was ok to have dragged him as a witch into the town square and burnt him at the stake.smatovic wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2019 2:04 pmHmm, imo this belongs to the EO subforum.Rebel wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2019 1:03 pm viewtopic.php?f=10&t=72066
I think this post belongs in the main forum, certainly the ICGA part.
Obviously you try to rehabilitate Vas resp. try to indict other chess
programmers of what Vas has done.
So you are in the role of the accuser, but who is the jury? Do you try to
mobilize a mob or do you wish to establish a trial. In the latter case you
should consider a real legal proceeding...I am not into all this, but there are
for sure channels to the ICGA for this purpose.
--
Srdja
No, it doesn't.chrisw wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2019 3:45 pmYour comment “what Vas has done” indicates an acceptance it was ok to have dragged him as a witch into the town square and burnt him at the stake.smatovic wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2019 2:04 pmHmm, imo this belongs to the EO subforum.Rebel wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2019 1:03 pm viewtopic.php?f=10&t=72066
I think this post belongs in the main forum, certainly the ICGA part.
Obviously you try to rehabilitate Vas resp. try to indict other chess
programmers of what Vas has done.
Ok, that's your pov.
Ok, you made your and Eds intention clear. Fine.chrisw wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2019 3:45 pm In the alternative, we are not witch hunters, we come from another level that says what happened in 2011 or whenever was not okay, the sorcery of which Vas was accused is more general, look, here is what we found.
What happened was not okay. We do not want to allow the contradiction to remain.
And there it is posted, expecting if people have something to say, put it there.smatovic wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2019 2:04 pmHmm, imo this belongs to the EO subforum.Rebel wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2019 1:03 pm viewtopic.php?f=10&t=72066
I think this post belongs in the main forum, certainly the ICGA part.
We don't need Sam to confirm or deny anything, if you search for "Similarity Report - d=1 move chooser rarity" (with quotes) on Google, Talkchess is the only result, because that thread wasn't censored.