That's a derail. I have said nothing about the moderation action itself nor do I want to be involved in that. I criticized you (as moderator and role model) for your unnecessary insults.hgm wrote: ↑Wed Sep 11, 2019 10:10 amAs Dann pointed out, there is more than one moderator.
You don't have to beat around the bush: just openly state that you think thread hijacking and publicly quarreling with the moderator in violation of the charter is perfectly normal behavior, and that it is indecent to criticize it. Then people know where you stand.
Computer Chess and Capitalism
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 6995
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2011 12:04 pm
Re: Computer Chess and Capitalism
90% of coding is debugging, the other 10% is writing bugs.
-
- Posts: 27811
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 10:06 am
- Location: Amsterdam
- Full name: H G Muller
Re: Computer Chess and Capitalism
Insults? If people take offense to the fact that their actions are typical of a group they consider shameful, it is their own actions that insult them! Not an accurate description of the behavior of that group.
-
- Posts: 6995
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2011 12:04 pm
Re: Computer Chess and Capitalism
And another derail, you are not willing to admit (or you just don't see, which is even worse) you broke the charter yourself by calling someone an anarchistic trouble-maker then you are unfit for moderator.
Now that we are talking anyway, the rule here is that we have moderator elections twice a year. Your mod time is long overdue. Are you going to take it up with Sam or shall I?
Now that we are talking anyway, the rule here is that we have moderator elections twice a year. Your mod time is long overdue. Are you going to take it up with Sam or shall I?
90% of coding is debugging, the other 10% is writing bugs.