Page 1 of 2

Galjoen 0.40 released

Posted: Tue Aug 27, 2019 7:51 pm
by Werner Taelemans
There was a lot of refactoring, and several bugs were fixed.
This version is tactically much stronger than v_0.39.
Overall, I expect a +60 Elo.

Re: Galjoen 0.40 released

Posted: Wed Aug 28, 2019 7:32 am
by Gabor Szots
Werner Taelemans wrote:
Tue Aug 27, 2019 7:51 pm
There was a lot of refactoring, and several bugs were fixed.
This version is tactically much stronger than v_0.39.
Overall, I expect a +60 Elo.
Great! I am looking forward to testing it as soon as I can (which is very soon).

Re: Galjoen 0.40 released

Posted: Wed Aug 28, 2019 9:16 am
by Werner Taelemans
Gabor Szots wrote:
Wed Aug 28, 2019 7:32 am
I am looking forward to testing it as soon as I can (which is very soon).
Thanks!

Re: Galjoen 0.40 released

Posted: Wed Aug 28, 2019 5:46 pm
by Modern Times
I also look forward to running it at chess960.

Re: Galjoen 0.40 released

Posted: Wed Aug 28, 2019 7:07 pm
by Werner Taelemans
Modern Times wrote:
Wed Aug 28, 2019 5:46 pm
I also look forward to running it at chess960.
Super! :)

Re: Galjoen 0.40 released

Posted: Tue Sep 03, 2019 7:21 pm
by Modern Times
For me anyway, this does not play chess960. Weird evaluations followed by the game terminating with an illegal move.
.
.

Re: Galjoen 0.40 released

Posted: Tue Sep 03, 2019 7:23 pm
by Modern Times

Re: Galjoen 0.40 released

Posted: Tue Sep 03, 2019 7:28 pm
by Modern Times
See above.

I had the same issues both in Cutechess GUI and ChessGUI

Re: Galjoen 0.40 released

Posted: Tue Sep 03, 2019 7:33 pm
by Modern Times
Another example here (Cutechess)
.
.
galjoen.JPG
galjoen.JPG (37.34 KiB) Viewed 1776 times

Re: Galjoen 0.40 released

Posted: Wed Sep 04, 2019 3:58 pm
by Werner Taelemans
Modern Times wrote:
Tue Sep 03, 2019 7:21 pm
For me anyway, this does not play chess960. Weird evaluations followed by the game terminating with an illegal move.
OK, thanks for testing. I'll take a look at it. Do you know the illegal move in your first example? And the initial fen in your second example?