Re: that should be 32. ...c4
Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2019 1:21 am
okay … yes … I was just doing that for my own analysis … thanks again for posting your results …zullil wrote: ↑Sun Mar 10, 2019 8:25 pmI'm having difficulty understanding your posts. I already demonstrated that Critter finds mate-in-13 from your original position, and does so in just minutes.pilgrimdan wrote: ↑Sun Mar 10, 2019 4:10 am
22/57 1:31:03 5,719,459k 1,047k -M11 c5-c4 Rh3xh6 Qc7-b6+ Rd6-d4 Qb6-b1+ Bg2-f1 Bc6xe4 f6xg7 Qb1xf1+ Kg1xf1 Kg8xg7 Qd2-g5+ Be4-g6 Qg5-f6+ Kg7xh6 g4-g5+ Kh6-h7 Rd4-h4+ Bg6-h5 Rh4xh5+ Kh7-g8
[d]1n3rk1/r1q2pp1/2bRpP1p/p1p1P3/4P1P1/P1B4R/3Q2BP/6K1 b - - 0 32
32. ...c4