zullil wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 11:12 am
Here's a straight search using Stockfish-dev. Not yet seeing the #37:
info depth 79 seldepth 76 multipv 1 score mate 38
Let's not have too much argueing about the single one move, Louis
I had long Backward before standalone- computing and don't think SF (or asmFish) is wrong as for too short lines, rather for too long ones most of the times, but I don't plan to try it all over again with MateFinder neither.
Even less because it doesn't matter at all as for a study other than mate in x- problem, which this one isn't.
But thanks for trying too.
Of course it would be somewhat finer, to know all patches of SF dev being in asmFish already too, but I'm used to see each and every branch as something of its own anyhow.
And yes, I'm happy too, to see the development continued at all.
zullil wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 11:12 am
Here's a straight search using Stockfish-dev. Not yet seeing the #37:
info depth 79 seldepth 76 multipv 1 score mate 38
Let's not have too much argueing about the single one move, Louis
I had long Backward before standalone- computing and don't think SF (or asmFish) is wrong as for too short lines, rather for too long ones most of the times, but I don't plan to try it all over again with MateFinder neither.
Even less because it doesn't matter at all as for a study other than mate in x- problem, which this one isn't.
But thanks for trying too.