Lc0 saturation.

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw

stavros
Posts: 165
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2014 1:29 am

Lc0 saturation.

Post by stavros »

after 37 million games i didnt see any saturation ,maybe that network is better than A0?
can anyone explain this?
frankp
Posts: 228
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2006 3:11 pm

Re: Lc0 saturation.

Post by frankp »

I certainly cannot comment on the question.
Practically, they would would have to run leela on the same hardware as A0 to know. Although scaling arguments (the leela ratio) have been made on the leela forum to suggest it is not there yet, but also not very far away.
IIRC, David Silver in one of his lectures indicated that A0 was still getting stronger when they stopped the A0 (Go, chess, shogi) training. So it seems A0 could have been, or could be, made even stronger. Their publically stated goal was to demonstrate the potential of their AI approach in these closed systems and that goal had been achieved, so they stopped - apparently.
Last edited by frankp on Sat Aug 18, 2018 11:25 am, edited 1 time in total.
Uri Blass
Posts: 10267
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:37 am
Location: Tel-Aviv Israel

Re: Lc0 saturation.

Post by Uri Blass »

stavros wrote: Sat Aug 18, 2018 10:24 am after 37 million games i didnt see any saturation ,maybe that network is better than A0?
can anyone explain this?
A0 scaled better than stockfish8 based on what I read(lost against stockfish at fast time control only to win at longer time control).
Does lc0 scale better than stockfish8?

If not then it seems that lc0 and A0 do not do the same thing.
jp
Posts: 1470
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2018 7:54 am

Re: Lc0 saturation.

Post by jp »

frankp wrote: Sat Aug 18, 2018 11:02 am IIRC, David Silver in one of his lectures indicated that A0 was still getting stronger when they stopped the A0 (Go, chess, shogi) training. So it seems A0 could have been, or could be, made even stronger. Their publically stated goal was to demonstrate the potential of their AI approach in these closed systems and that goal had been achieved, so they stopped - apparently.
No, it was supposedly still getting better for Go, not for chess. Their figure showed it had flatlined for chess after about 12 million games. Or 21 million if you want to be cautious.
stavros
Posts: 165
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2014 1:29 am

Re: Lc0 saturation.

Post by stavros »

what i mean saturation is lower elo gain per week for example until no further improving
Leo
Posts: 1078
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2016 6:55 pm
Location: USA/Minnesota
Full name: Leo Anger

Re: Lc0 saturation.

Post by Leo »

I think it is saturated.
Advanced Micro Devices fan.
stavros
Posts: 165
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2014 1:29 am

Re: Lc0 saturation.

Post by stavros »

from testserver.lczero.org there is a lot regression, see from 10854 to 10879
http://testserver.lczero.org/matches
whereagles
Posts: 565
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2014 12:03 pm

Re: Lc0 saturation.

Post by whereagles »

it will eventually saturate the 20x256 NN.. might saturate at a higher ELO with a bigger net, but that's not clear

as of now saturation can be checked for with some statistical time-series test, but just from looking at it, I doubt it reached that point.
JJJ
Posts: 1346
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2014 1:47 pm

Re: Lc0 saturation.

Post by JJJ »

I heard bigger net was coming anyway. I don't think Lczero will reach the level of the big 3 with this size of net, but it might with the next one. Anyway, in one year, Lczero will be the best engine in the world.
Leo
Posts: 1078
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2016 6:55 pm
Location: USA/Minnesota
Full name: Leo Anger

Re: Lc0 saturation.

Post by Leo »

JJJ wrote: Mon Aug 20, 2018 5:32 pm I heard bigger net was coming anyway. I don't think Lczero will reach the level of the big 3 with this size of net, but it might with the next one. Anyway, in one year, Lczero will be the best engine in the world.
When?
Advanced Micro Devices fan.