Hannibal Arasan

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw

chrisw
Posts: 4319
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2012 4:28 pm

Hannibal Arasan

Post by chrisw »

Hannibal looks good here, nites strong, if BxNe4 after Nc4 then no bishop pair and white strong on lite squares. Did I miss something? should be a white win

[d]3q1rk1/pr4b1/1p1p2pp/B1pPpb2/P3N3/N2P1P2/1PP4P/R2Q2RK b - - 0 22
chrisw
Posts: 4319
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2012 4:28 pm

Re: Hannibal Arasan

Post by chrisw »

Hannibal error? Surely after Kh7 Qe2 and challenge on the f-file
jdart
Posts: 4367
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 5:23 am
Location: http://www.arasanchess.org

Re: Hannibal Arasan

Post by jdart »

Hannibal lost. I haven't done a full analysis, but stockfish thinks White should not have played Qe3 here:

[d]3q4/p5bk/3p1rp1/p1pPp2p/P1N1Pr2/3P4/1PP3RP/4Q1RK w - - 0 29

Evals start going down from there. There might have been other errors.

--Jon
chrisw
Posts: 4319
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2012 4:28 pm

Re: Hannibal Arasan

Post by chrisw »

jdart wrote: Thu Aug 16, 2018 6:09 pm Hannibal lost. I haven't done a full analysis, but stockfish thinks White should not have played Qe3 here:

[d]3q4/p5bk/3p1rp1/p1pPp2p/P1N1Pr2/3P4/1PP3RP/4Q1RK w - - 0 29

Evals start going down from there. There might have been other errors.

--Jon
It was tempting, I suppose, for Hannibal to double on the g-pawn, but the cost was the f-file, and probably the game. White wants to trade everything off here and then win with the nite against the bishop. Instead f-file problems and the rearward black rook f6 doubles as defender d6 and supporting the f-file battery. Black is penetrating and white can't do much about it. So, the challenge on the f-file was important, trade Rooks and play QN vs QB or N vs B, the former being a little problematical because white K exposed to checks and perhaps draw. But this position is horrible for white, black can even pawn storm on kside. Initiative.
MikeGL
Posts: 1010
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 2:49 pm

Re: Hannibal Arasan

Post by MikeGL »

jdart wrote: Thu Aug 16, 2018 6:09 pm Hannibal lost. I haven't done a full analysis, but stockfish thinks White should not have played Qe3 here:

[d]3q4/p5bk/3p1rp1/p1pPp2p/P1N1Pr2/3P4/1PP3RP/4Q1RK w - - 0 29

Evals start going down from there. There might have been other errors.

--Jon
Yes my SF9 agrees too. Qe3 just loses a tempo as shown in the actual game. Directly capturing a5 with either Nxa5 or Qxa5 was preferred by SF9. What happened in the actual game is strange, white gave up a defendable a4 pawn (it can be protected with b3), but a5 of black cannot be saved and can be captured anytime without rush. So b3 first to defend a4, then grab blacks a5.
I told my wife that a husband is like a fine wine; he gets better with age. The next day, she locked me in the cellar.