TalkChess.com

whereagles wrote: ↑Wed Aug 08, 2018 11:51 am Gabor, it is very confusing yes. I believe they are using a 15x192 network in the main server (ID in the 500s) and a test network of 20x256 in the test server (ID in the 10000s), but I'm not totally sure.

The 20x256 network is the same size as AlphaZero so, in theory, with proper training time it will be as strong as A0, provided it will subsequently run on hardware comparable to google's 4 TPU.

The 15x192 network runs quicker and is stronger when using "lesser" hardware, e.g. nvidia geforce below 1060 or thereabouts.

Thank you for th reply.

whereagles wrote: ↑Wed Aug 08, 2018 11:51 am Gabor, it is very confusing yes. I believe they are using a 15x192 network in the main server (ID in the 500s) and a test network of 20x256 in the test server (ID in the 10000s), but I'm not totally sure.

The 20x256 network is the same size as AlphaZero so, in theory, with proper training time it will be as strong as A0, provided it will subsequently run on hardware comparable to google's 4 TPU.

The 15x192 network runs quicker and is stronger when using "lesser" hardware, e.g. nvidia geforce below 1060 or thereabouts.

Yes main server has so far the strongest 15x192 net and test server contains the strongest 20x256 net.
Even on 1060, the strongest 20x256 net is at least 70Elo stronger than the strongest 15x192 net. That is because 15x192 definitively plateaued and there is not much chance it would improve noticeably in the future. 20x256 net still has some 100-150 Elo headroom.

whereagles wrote: ↑Wed Aug 08, 2018 11:57 am

pohl4711 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 08, 2018 8:03 am I doubt, that DeusX will be allowed to play in Div 3.
https://blog.lczero.org/2018/08/07/mistake/

Ok, I think that settles it. It is a bit too radical, but understandable. (I would allow DX to finish this season, but I'm not the admin lol)

Still, comparing learning approaches does have value per se. Would be nice to see how far one gets using supervised learning based on top human and engine game (of the non-selfplay variety, of course).

Well if Albert actually knew anything about programming he could have easily added back TB support to Lc0 (from LcZero) since it suites supervised approach and in the process increases drastically the strength of his net and avoided this thing all together...

Milos wrote: ↑Wed Aug 08, 2018 1:44 pm

whereagles wrote: ↑Wed Aug 08, 2018 11:51 am Gabor, it is very confusing yes. I believe they are using a 15x192 network in the main server (ID in the 500s) and a test network of 20x256 in the test server (ID in the 10000s), but I'm not totally sure.

The 20x256 network is the same size as AlphaZero so, in theory, with proper training time it will be as strong as A0, provided it will subsequently run on hardware comparable to google's 4 TPU.

The 15x192 network runs quicker and is stronger when using "lesser" hardware, e.g. nvidia geforce below 1060 or thereabouts.

Yes main server has so far the strongest 15x192 net and test server contains the strongest 20x256 net.
Even on 1060, the strongest 20x256 net is at least 70Elo stronger than the strongest 15x192 net. That is because 15x192 definitively plateaued and there is not much chance it would improve noticeably in the future. 20x256 net still has some 100-150 Elo headroom.

I have GTX 1060 6GB , so which net should I download to have the best Leela ? And what is his best config ? I d like to test the best Leela against others engine. Thanks you.

JJJ wrote: ↑Wed Aug 08, 2018 6:43 pm

Milos wrote: ↑Wed Aug 08, 2018 1:44 pm

whereagles wrote: ↑Wed Aug 08, 2018 11:51 am Gabor, it is very confusing yes. I believe they are using a 15x192 network in the main server (ID in the 500s) and a test network of 20x256 in the test server (ID in the 10000s), but I'm not totally sure.

The 20x256 network is the same size as AlphaZero so, in theory, with proper training time it will be as strong as A0, provided it will subsequently run on hardware comparable to google's 4 TPU.

The 15x192 network runs quicker and is stronger when using "lesser" hardware, e.g. nvidia geforce below 1060 or thereabouts.

Yes main server has so far the strongest 15x192 net and test server contains the strongest 20x256 net.
Even on 1060, the strongest 20x256 net is at least 70Elo stronger than the strongest 15x192 net. That is because 15x192 definitively plateaued and there is not much chance it would improve noticeably in the future. 20x256 net still has some 100-150 Elo headroom.

I have GTX 1060 6GB , so which net should I download to have the best Leela ? And what is his best config ? I d like to test the best Leela against others engine. Thanks you.

I believe it is still 10445. I use the default settings. Probably something could be gained with CLOP-ing them, but since training is also done with them IMHO not much.

meanwhile the "lowly" 15x192 main server seems to be rising to unseen heights.. not bad for a would-be plateauing NN.

Well.. for self-play that is. Maybe it's not so hot in general play.

pohl4711 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 08, 2018 6:50 am Just read on discord (dev-log channel), that Leela will play with Net 10480 in TCEC in Divison 3. If anybody want to do some testing with TCEC-Leela...

Download the Net 10480 here: http://testserver.lczero.org/networks

Because of that, I restarted my long thinking-time testrun (https://www.sp-cc.de/long-thinkingtime.htm) with that Net - lets see, how Leela will score with 10480 (300 games with 12'+5''). Result not before next Wednesday. My first testrun with a 20x256 net - Leela-ratio with that bigger net in my testrun is 0.67 (which should be a little bit better for Leela than in TCEC)
Stay tuned!

I have very small samples at longer time control, but it might be that the newest nets are even stronger than ID10480 at LTC. In fast games they are similar, but at 600'' + 10'' time control I used, the small samples are:

Lc0 on GTX 1060 6GB
Deep Shredder 13 on 4 i7 cores 3.8 GHz

Lc0 ID10474 vs Deep Shredder 13 4 CPU
+8 -2 =10

A performance of 3430 CCRL 40/4' Elo points

With one of the newest nets:

Lc0 ID10526 vs Deep Shredder 13 4 CPU
+8 -0 =12

A performance of 3480 CCRL 40/4' Elo points

ID10526 literally destroys Shredder 13 on 4 cores at this time control, even the drawn games were usually in Lc0 advantage, but not sufficient to win.

Laskos wrote: ↑Wed Aug 08, 2018 9:36 pm

Lc0 ID10526 vs Deep Shredder 13 4 CPU
+8 -0 =12

A performance of 3480 CCRL 40/4' Elo points

ID10526 literally destroys Shredder 13 on 4 cores at this time control

This result shows + 147 elo than shredder, resulting same elo of Fire.
However latest SF is still +200 elo than Fire.
This is why I posted in another thread that Leela could be 4th best chess engine now.

Laskos wrote: ↑Wed Aug 08, 2018 9:36 pm I have very small samples at longer time control, but it might be that the newest nets are even stronger than ID10480 at LTC. In fast games they are similar, but at 600'' + 10'' time control I used, the small samples are:

Lc0 on GTX 1060 6GB
Deep Shredder 13 on 4 i7 cores 3.8 GHz

Lc0 ID10474 vs Deep Shredder 13 4 CPU
+8 -2 =10

A performance of 3430 CCRL 40/4' Elo points

With one of the newest nets:

Lc0 ID10526 vs Deep Shredder 13 4 CPU
+8 -0 =12

A performance of 3480 CCRL 40/4' Elo points

ID10526 literally destroys Shredder 13 on 4 cores at this time control, even the drawn games were usually in Lc0 advantage, but not sufficient to win.

Main contributor of testserver right now, Sergio Vieri, run a test a little before in his stream(he stop it and restarted it since he realized he did not save the PGNs) and the result of latest testnet versus SF9 was unbelievable. I saw just 1 game and Leela completely outplayed SF 9!
Time control is 40/1. Result was:
Lc0 10547 on 2 Titan V - Stockfish 9 on 31 cores(2xE5-2620): +6 -1 =4 with +170 Elo performance for Leela versus Stockfish 9!

His stream is the following and now he uses i think 40/2 TC and first game was draw:
https://www.twitch.tv/sergiovieri