which is the fastest SF

[Kohflote]

Hi all,

Which site has the fastest compile of SF (development version): Brainfish (without the book), ultimaiq, or asmFish or ??


Thank you & regards,
Koh, Kah Huat

[Guenther]

Hi all,

Which site has the fastest compile of SF (development version): Brainfish (without the book), ultimaiq, or asmFish or ??


Thank you & regards,
Koh, Kah Huat

Asmfish should be the fastest always.

[Nordlandia]

Cfish support numa. So does asmfish.

[Dann Corbit]

Hi all,

Which site has the fastest compile of SF (development version): Brainfish (without the book), ultimaiq, or asmFish or ??


Thank you & regards,
Koh, Kah Huat

Asmfish should be the fastest always.

And yet Asmfish has done some sort of face-plant:
http://www.sp-cc.de/

The NPS is still better. But the game performance is not.

Nobody tests CFish, but I guess that Cfish is strongest right now.
Brainfish is just SF with a special book. (Theoretically) there should be no performance difference with ordinary SF.

[Guenther]

Hi all,

Which site has the fastest compile of SF (development version): Brainfish (without the book), ultimaiq, or asmFish or ??


Thank you & regards,
Koh, Kah Huat

Asmfish should be the fastest always.

And yet Asmfish has done some sort of face-plant:
http://www.sp-cc.de/

The NPS is still better. But the game performance is not.

Nobody tests CFish, but I guess that Cfish is strongest right now.
Brainfish is just SF with a special book. (Theoretically) there should be no performance difference with ordinary SF.

http://www.talkchess.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=67048

[Leo]

https://github.com/syzygy1/Cfish/releases


I am going to give cfish a try.

[Leo]

This guy is not high on cfish.

https://www.reddit.com/r/chess/comments ... s_asmfish/

[Kohflote]

Thank you, guys 😊

[MikeB]

Hi all,

Which site has the fastest compile of SF (development version): Brainfish (without the book), ultimaiq, or asmFish or ??


Thank you & regards,
Koh, Kah Huat

Asmfish should be the fastest always.

And yet Asmfish has done some sort of face-plant:
http://www.sp-cc.de/

The NPS is still better. But the game performance is not.

Nobody tests CFish, but I guess that Cfish is strongest right now.
Brainfish is just SF with a special book. (Theoretically) there should be no performance difference with ordinary SF.

get the current asmfish ...
time control here 5 min games with 10 second increment with 1024M hash, custom opening book that tends to exaggerate Elo differences ( less draws). McBrain here is an updated version , totally rebased on current dev Stockfish - will send you the source.

Code: Select all

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   1 asmFishX_2018-04-09_popc   3108   0.0   21   21   252  130.5  51.8   38   29  185  15.1  73.4  3096 
   2 McBrain 9.1 64 POPCNT      3100   8.2   21   21   252  126.0  50.0   33   33  186  13.1  73.8  3100 
   3 Stockfish 080418 64 POPC   3092   8.2   21   21   252  121.5  48.2   27   36  189  10.7  75.0  3104 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Geonerd]

FWIW:
AMD 6 core Phenom 1045T at 3.4. 2GB, large tables.
All programs running Popcnt compile.

Tal - Vasiukov, "Hippopotamus position" (1964 USSR Ch, Move #19.)

SF9 - 8,870 MNPS
Cfish9 - 10,700
ASM April 8, '18 - 11,250