MikeGL wrote:
I am afraid I have also weak hardware.
[pgn]
[Event "?"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "2018.01.27"]
[Round "?"]
[White "?"]
[Black "?"]
[Result "1-0"]
[BlackElo "2400"]
[WhiteElo "2400"]
[TimeControl "1800+10"]
[SetUp "1"]
[FEN "4k3/6p1/8/3p3b/p1pPp1pP/BpP1PpP1/1P3P1R/K2N3N w - - 0 1"]
[Termination "normal"]
[PlyCount "65"]
[WhiteType "human"]
[BlackType "human"]
1. Kb1 Kd8 2. Kc1 Kd7 3. Kd2 Kd8 4. Ke1 Kd7 5. Kf1 Ke8 6. Rg2 Kf7 7. Rg1
Ke8 8. Ke1 Kd8 9. Kd2 Ke8 10. Re1 Kd7 11. Re2 (11. Bf8 g6 12. Re2 Kc6 13.
Ke1 Kd7 14. Rd2 Kc6 15. Rd3 Kb5 16. Kd2 Ka5 17. Kc1 Kb5 18. Rd2 Kc6 19. Rc2
bxc2 20. Kxc2 Kb5 21. Kb1 g5 22. Ka2 Bf7 23. b3 axb3+ 24. Ka3 Be8 25. Nb2
Bh5 26. Na4 Be8 27. Nc5 Kc6 28. Bh6 Kb5{+-}) 11. .. Kd8 (11. .. Kc6 12. Kc1
fxe2 13. Kd2 exd1=Q+ 14. Kxd1 Bf7 15. f3 gxf3 16. Nf2 Kd7 17. g4 Ke6 18.
Ke1 Kf6 19. Kf1 Be6 (19. .. g5 20. h5 Bg8 21. Kg1 Be6) 20. Kg1 g5 21. h5
Bd7 22. Kh2 Be6 23. Kg3 Bc8 24. Nh1 Ke6 25. Kh3 Bd7 26. Ng3 Kf6 27. Nf1 Kf7
28. Nd2 Kf6 29. Bd6 Kf7 30. Bc7 a3 31. bxa3 b2 32. Kg3 Bxg4) 12. Ke1 Ke8
13. Rd2 Kf7 14. Rd3 Ke8 15. Kd2 Kf7 16. Kc1 Ke8 17. Rd2 Kd7 18. Bf8 g6 19.
Rc2 bxc2 20. Kxc2 Kc6 21. Kb1 Kb5 22. Ka2 Ka5 23. Ka3 Kb5 24. Bb4 g5 25.
Bf8 Be8 26. Be7 Ka5 27. Bxg5 Kb5 28. b3 axb3 29. Nb2 Bf7 30. Na4 Ka5 31.
Bd8+ Kb5 32. Nc5 Be8 33. Bf6{+-} 1-0
[/pgn]
Nevermind Mike, problem to me rather is, that your .pgn is only 33 moves long. and you deviate right from the start from author's solution (if it really is his one, I talk about the one given at YACPDB), so the taking of the white Rook happens at a time, when White's h-pawn is still on the board, which changes a lot, as you wrote somewhere by yourself. Could well be, that Black should just wait with this till White has given the h-pawn, which he probably would have to sooner or later yet.
The deviation of yours is 1...Kd8 instead of ...Kf7, so just theoretically even if your line worked, it doesn't mean it would do so for the other one first black move too., just to be sophisticated.
And even at this one your line, I don't see any progress after just 32...Kc6 instead of ...Be8 (?) there.
BTW, after that 33.Ne6 instead of your last move 33.Be8 (?!) get's #37- output of MF already.
Taking back the last 3 plies with full hash and playing 32...Kc6 instead of your ...Be8 (?) lets evals drop, output looks like that:
[d]3B4/5b2/2k5/2Np4/2pPp1pP/KpP1PpP1/5P2/7N w - - 0 1
Analysis by MateFinder 020118 64:
33.Kb2 Kd6 34.Bg5 Kc7 35.Na6+ Kc6 36.Nb4+ Kd6 37.Bf4+ Ke7 38.Bh6 Kd7 39.Kb1 Ke6 40.Nc6 Be8 41.Ne5 Bh5 42.Bg7 Ke7 43.Kb2 Ke6 44.Bf8 Kf5 45.Be7 Ke6 46.Bd8 Kd6 47.Bg5 Ke6 48.Ka1 Kd6 49.Kb1 Kc7 50.Bh6 Kd6 51.Bf8+ Ke6 52.Kc1 Kf5 53.Kb2 Ke6 54.Bb4 Kf5 55.Kb1 Ke6 56.Bc5 Kf5 57.Be7 Ke6 58.Bg5 Kd6 59.Bf4 Ke6 60.Nc6 Kd7 61.Nb4 Ke6 62.Kb2 Be8 63.Bh6 Bf7 64.Bg7 Kd6
+- (6.95) Depth: 59/64 00:03:07 1556MN
Please don't follow this output- line ply by ply too far as for proving anything, at the end eval isn't much better then at start, yet there will be some blunder- moves for any side maybe, didn't have a closer look by myself.
But just be so kind and give a line of your own with some eval- progress to be seen, if you manage to get some after 32...Kc6, the position of the dia.
To me Black's King seems to be able to hold opposition against white one again, doesn't it?
My hope went off after author's solution up to move nr. 49, where Marek found 49. Ke1 (?) going wrong.
4k3/6p1/8/3p3b/p1pPp1pP/BpP1PpP1/1P3P1R/K2N3N w - - 0 1
1. Kb1 Kf7 2. Kc1 Ke8 3. Kd2 Kf7 4. Ke1 Ke8 5. Kf1 Kf7 6. Rg2 Ke8 7. Rg1 Kf7 8.
Ke1 Ke8 9. Kd2 Kd7 10. Re1 Kc6 11. Re2 Kd7 12. Kc1 Kc6 13. Rc2 Kb5 14. Kd2 Kc6
15. Rc1 Kd7 16. Ra1 Ke6 17. Bc5 Be8 18. h5 Bd7 19. Rc1 Be8 20. Rc2 Bxh5 21. Kc1
Kf7 22. Rd2 Ke6 23. Rd3 Kf7 24. Kd2 Ke6 25. Ke1 Kd7 26. Rd2 Ke6 27. Re2 Kd7 28.
Kd2 Ke6 29. Re1 Kf7 30. Rg1 Ke6 31. Ke1 Kf6 32. Kf1 Ke6 33. Rg2 Kf6 34. Rh2 g6
35. Rg2 Kf5 36. Rg1 Ke6 37. Ke1 Kd7 38. Kd2 Ke6 39. Re1 Kd7 40. Re2 Ke6 41. Ke1
Kd7 42. Rd2 Ke6 43. Rd3 Kd7 44. Kd2 Ke6 45. Kc1 Kf7 46. Rd2 Ke8 47. Rc2 Kd7 48.
Kd2 g5
[d]8/8/4k3/2Bp2pb/p1pPp1p1/1pP1PpP1/1P1K1P2/2RN3N w - - 0 50
Do you have a repair from there onwards too already maybe?
Peter.