Milos wrote:A0 is well below 3300Elo at 5min/game TC as shown in the very same paper about it.
Of course, I can defeat A0, the one that defeated Stockfish 8, the whole week, and twice on Fridays, on a 5min/game TC.
The game would go like this:
I play:
1.e4 (best by test, A0 hasn't learned well!)
A0 replies:
1...e5?? (blunder, everyone knows the Sicilian is best)
I play:
2.Nf3
A0 replies:
2...Nc6?? (blunder, the Petroff is more solid)
I play:
3.Bb5
A0 replies:
3...Nf6!? (innacuracy, 3...a6 is better first)
I play:
4.d3
A0 replies:
4...Bc5!? (I'll just stop commenting on this nonsense...)
I play:
5.Bxc6
A0 replies:
5...dxc6!?
I play:
6.O-O!!
A0 replies:
Alpha Zero forfeits on time, white is victorious!
Haha! See? A0 plays a 1 min/move, I ask for game in 5 minutes, it doesn't have time to even make its 6th move...
That's what you meant by Pablo having decent chances, right?
Otherwise, there's no such thing as "5 min/game" when A0 plays at fixed time per move.
There's no such thing as locking the position and beating A0 on time when A0 always makes a move in the specified time.
There's no such thing as decent chances when Pablo is only able to win by locking the position and winning on time.
And there's no such thing as DeepMind implementing time management just so that Pablo has a chance to lock the position and beat A0 on the clock.