I think he was just defensive because Stockfish, his brainchild, was the sacrificial lamb in this announcement and test.gbtami wrote:I don't think Tord was nitpicking. He just pointed out some facts. But the best was the summary: "Stockfish vs AlphaZero is very much a comparison of apples to orangutans"Laskos wrote:Strange Tord nitpicking on time control issue. That's a bit silly for a 28-0 score. Other thing of Tord and of some GMs are interesting.kranium wrote:Interesting reactions about AlphaZero from top GMs at the London Chess Classic, and a lengthy comment from Tord Romstad:
https://www.chess.com/news/view/alphaze ... ish-author
link to the video clips from above article:
https://www.twitch.tv/videos/207621332
Reactions about AlphaZero from top GMs...
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 3019
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 9:57 pm
- Location: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Re: Reactions about AlphaZero from top GMs...
"Tactics are the bricks and sticks that make up a game, but positional play is the architectural blueprint."
-
- Posts: 4565
- Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2006 2:40 am
- Full name:
Re: Reactions about AlphaZero from top GMs...
I think Tord would have used the same arguments if it had been Komodo, Houdini, Rybka or any other engine on the altar. Stockfish is a further development of Tord's Glaurung but that is no reason to get overly sentimental over being slaughtered (As any scientific experiment has to have a discussion at the end, what the results mean and what could be improved methodologically). Several testfactors could have influenced the tests to an unknown degree if changed, although almost 100 points difference would not be easy to overcome. It is not just about the demonstration of learning, it is about the inherent superiority of their very different approach to tackling artificial chessplaying, and that would have deserved more attention to detail, if possible, given their own timeconstraints for instance.
Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first
place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you
are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it.
-- Brian W. Kernighan
place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you
are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it.
-- Brian W. Kernighan
-
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2016 1:47 pm
Re: Reactions about AlphaZero from top GMs...
gbtami wrote:I don't think Tord was nitpicking. He just pointed out some facts. But the best was the summary: "Stockfish vs AlphaZero is very much a comparison of apples to orangutans"Laskos wrote:Strange Tord nitpicking on time control issue. That's a bit silly for a 28-0 score. Other thing of Tord and of some GMs are interesting.kranium wrote:Interesting reactions about AlphaZero from top GMs at the London Chess Classic, and a lengthy comment from Tord Romstad:
https://www.chess.com/news/view/alphaze ... ish-author
link to the video clips from above article:
https://www.twitch.tv/videos/207621332
Why ? Is the first playing Chess (in know for sure that SF plays chess) and the other is playing Othello ?
-
- Posts: 1339
- Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 9:43 am
- Location: New Delhi, India
Re: Reactions about AlphaZero from top GMs...
Ignore them. Just frustrated rants by old men seeing their Life's work going down the Drain.Frank Brenner wrote:Why ? Is the first playing Chess (in know for sure that SF plays chess) and the other is playing Othello ?
Understandable.
i7 5960X @ 4.1 Ghz, 64 GB G.Skill RipJaws RAM, Twin Asus ROG Strix OC 11 GB Geforce 2080 Tis
-
- Posts: 4565
- Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2006 2:40 am
- Full name:
Re: Reactions about AlphaZero from top GMs...
Look Anil, this is supposed to be a discussion forum, it's not the TCEC chat, not a freefight match or a Monty Python sketch. Please keep the noise level down a bit. We're just trying to have some fun here. Thank you.
Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first
place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you
are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it.
-- Brian W. Kernighan
place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you
are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it.
-- Brian W. Kernighan
-
- Posts: 708
- Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 6:34 am
Re: Reactions about AlphaZero from top GMs...
That is exactly what I would like to say. Although we dont know exactly how many times AZ got hardware bonus than SF ( Let us say 100 times) but AZ chess skill is at least comparable or superior than Stockfish. A 20 years old chess program fritz 3 on 100 times hardware cant beat current stockfish. ( The only nitpick I would like to blame google is that they used 1GB ram whereas 8GB is standard for mid range PC in the market )Laskos wrote:Strange Tord nitpicking on time control issue. That's a bit silly for a 28-0 score. Other thing of Tord and of some GMs are interesting.kranium wrote:Interesting reactions about AlphaZero from top GMs at the London Chess Classic, and a lengthy comment from Tord Romstad:
https://www.chess.com/news/view/alphaze ... ish-author
link to the video clips from above article:
https://www.twitch.tv/videos/207621332
-
- Posts: 389
- Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2012 1:29 pm
- Location: Hungary
Re: Reactions about AlphaZero from top GMs...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u-NyH_rKCwEFrank Brenner wrote:gbtami wrote:I don't think Tord was nitpicking. He just pointed out some facts. But the best was the summary: "Stockfish vs AlphaZero is very much a comparison of apples to orangutans"Laskos wrote:Strange Tord nitpicking on time control issue. That's a bit silly for a 28-0 score. Other thing of Tord and of some GMs are interesting.kranium wrote:Interesting reactions about AlphaZero from top GMs at the London Chess Classic, and a lengthy comment from Tord Romstad:
https://www.chess.com/news/view/alphaze ... ish-author
link to the video clips from above article:
https://www.twitch.tv/videos/207621332
Why ? Is the first playing Chess (in know for sure that SF plays chess) and the other is playing Othello ?
-
- Posts: 10948
- Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 10:21 pm
- Full name: Kai Laskos
Re: Reactions about AlphaZero from top GMs...
Yes, but Tord also said the most important thing, IMO. In maybe 5 years, the times of low budget single brilliant author or 1-2-3 brilliant authors of close to top engines will end. Massive hardware (and budget) will be needed for training the networks, and such giants as Google or whatever have a decisive advantage. Maybe at top will be 2-3 large distributed projects aside from some large companies. Seems a pretty gloomy future.Nay Lin Tun wrote:That is exactly what I would like to say. Although we dont know exactly how many times AZ got hardware bonus than SF ( Let us say 100 times) but AZ chess skill is at least comparable or superior than Stockfish. A 20 years old chess program fritz 3 on 100 times hardware cant beat current stockfish. ( The only nitpick I would like to blame google is that they used 1GB ram whereas 8GB is standard for mid range PC in the market )Laskos wrote:Strange Tord nitpicking on time control issue. That's a bit silly for a 28-0 score. Other thing of Tord and of some GMs are interesting.kranium wrote:Interesting reactions about AlphaZero from top GMs at the London Chess Classic, and a lengthy comment from Tord Romstad:
https://www.chess.com/news/view/alphaze ... ish-author
link to the video clips from above article:
https://www.twitch.tv/videos/207621332
Last edited by Laskos on Sun Dec 10, 2017 11:35 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 3657
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2015 11:41 am
- Location: hungary
Re: Reactions about AlphaZero from top GMs...
[quote="Eelco de Groot"]
...
It is not just about the demonstration of learning, it is about the inherent superiority of their very different approach to tackling artificial chessplaying, ...
[/quote]
I agree.
The "normal" chess engines can not use effectively a hardware owing much more than 64 cores.
But AlphaZero using a more bigger and more complicated hardware can enhance further not only the Elo number but the playing quality of the chess playing machines.
...
It is not just about the demonstration of learning, it is about the inherent superiority of their very different approach to tackling artificial chessplaying, ...
[/quote]
I agree.
The "normal" chess engines can not use effectively a hardware owing much more than 64 cores.
But AlphaZero using a more bigger and more complicated hardware can enhance further not only the Elo number but the playing quality of the chess playing machines.
-
- Posts: 3657
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2015 11:41 am
- Location: hungary
Re: Reactions about AlphaZero from top GMs...
[quote="Eelco de Groot"]
Look Anil, this is supposed to be a discussion forum, it's not the TCEC chat, not a freefight match or a Monty Python sketch. Please keep the noise level down a bit. We're just trying to have some fun here. Thank you.
[/quote]
As if I would have been say....
Look Anil, this is supposed to be a discussion forum, it's not the TCEC chat, not a freefight match or a Monty Python sketch. Please keep the noise level down a bit. We're just trying to have some fun here. Thank you.
[/quote]
As if I would have been say....