Reactions about AlphaZero from top GMs...

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw

Albert Silver
Posts: 3019
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 9:57 pm
Location: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Re: Reactions about AlphaZero from top GMs...

Post by Albert Silver »

gbtami wrote:
Laskos wrote:
kranium wrote:Interesting reactions about AlphaZero from top GMs at the London Chess Classic, and a lengthy comment from Tord Romstad:

https://www.chess.com/news/view/alphaze ... ish-author

link to the video clips from above article:
https://www.twitch.tv/videos/207621332
Strange Tord nitpicking on time control issue. That's a bit silly for a 28-0 score. Other thing of Tord and of some GMs are interesting.
I don't think Tord was nitpicking. He just pointed out some facts. But the best was the summary: "Stockfish vs AlphaZero is very much a comparison of apples to orangutans"
:D
I think he was just defensive because Stockfish, his brainchild, was the sacrificial lamb in this announcement and test.
"Tactics are the bricks and sticks that make up a game, but positional play is the architectural blueprint."
User avatar
Eelco de Groot
Posts: 4565
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2006 2:40 am
Full name:   

Re: Reactions about AlphaZero from top GMs...

Post by Eelco de Groot »

I think Tord would have used the same arguments if it had been Komodo, Houdini, Rybka or any other engine on the altar. Stockfish is a further development of Tord's Glaurung but that is no reason to get overly sentimental over being slaughtered :) (As any scientific experiment has to have a discussion at the end, what the results mean and what could be improved methodologically). Several testfactors could have influenced the tests to an unknown degree if changed, although almost 100 points difference would not be easy to overcome. It is not just about the demonstration of learning, it is about the inherent superiority of their very different approach to tackling artificial chessplaying, and that would have deserved more attention to detail, if possible, given their own timeconstraints for instance.
Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first
place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you
are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it.
-- Brian W. Kernighan
Frank Brenner
Posts: 34
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2016 1:47 pm

Re: Reactions about AlphaZero from top GMs...

Post by Frank Brenner »

gbtami wrote:
Laskos wrote:
kranium wrote:Interesting reactions about AlphaZero from top GMs at the London Chess Classic, and a lengthy comment from Tord Romstad:

https://www.chess.com/news/view/alphaze ... ish-author

link to the video clips from above article:
https://www.twitch.tv/videos/207621332
Strange Tord nitpicking on time control issue. That's a bit silly for a 28-0 score. Other thing of Tord and of some GMs are interesting.
I don't think Tord was nitpicking. He just pointed out some facts. But the best was the summary: "Stockfish vs AlphaZero is very much a comparison of apples to orangutans"
:D


Why ? Is the first playing Chess (in know for sure that SF plays chess) and the other is playing Othello ?
shrapnel
Posts: 1339
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 9:43 am
Location: New Delhi, India

Re: Reactions about AlphaZero from top GMs...

Post by shrapnel »

Frank Brenner wrote:Why ? Is the first playing Chess (in know for sure that SF plays chess) and the other is playing Othello ?
Ignore them. Just frustrated rants by old men seeing their Life's work going down the Drain.
Understandable.
i7 5960X @ 4.1 Ghz, 64 GB G.Skill RipJaws RAM, Twin Asus ROG Strix OC 11 GB Geforce 2080 Tis
User avatar
Eelco de Groot
Posts: 4565
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2006 2:40 am
Full name:   

Re: Reactions about AlphaZero from top GMs...

Post by Eelco de Groot »

Look Anil, this is supposed to be a discussion forum, it's not the TCEC chat, not a freefight match or a Monty Python sketch. Please keep the noise level down a bit. We're just trying to have some fun here. Thank you.
Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first
place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you
are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it.
-- Brian W. Kernighan
Nay Lin Tun
Posts: 708
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 6:34 am

Re: Reactions about AlphaZero from top GMs...

Post by Nay Lin Tun »

Laskos wrote:
kranium wrote:Interesting reactions about AlphaZero from top GMs at the London Chess Classic, and a lengthy comment from Tord Romstad:

https://www.chess.com/news/view/alphaze ... ish-author

link to the video clips from above article:
https://www.twitch.tv/videos/207621332
Strange Tord nitpicking on time control issue. That's a bit silly for a 28-0 score. Other thing of Tord and of some GMs are interesting.
That is exactly what I would like to say. Although we dont know exactly how many times AZ got hardware bonus than SF ( Let us say 100 times) but AZ chess skill is at least comparable or superior than Stockfish. A 20 years old chess program fritz 3 on 100 times hardware cant beat current stockfish. ( The only nitpick I would like to blame google is that they used 1GB ram whereas 8GB is standard for mid range PC in the market )
User avatar
gbtami
Posts: 389
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2012 1:29 pm
Location: Hungary

Re: Reactions about AlphaZero from top GMs...

Post by gbtami »

Frank Brenner wrote:
gbtami wrote:
Laskos wrote:
kranium wrote:Interesting reactions about AlphaZero from top GMs at the London Chess Classic, and a lengthy comment from Tord Romstad:

https://www.chess.com/news/view/alphaze ... ish-author

link to the video clips from above article:
https://www.twitch.tv/videos/207621332
Strange Tord nitpicking on time control issue. That's a bit silly for a 28-0 score. Other thing of Tord and of some GMs are interesting.
I don't think Tord was nitpicking. He just pointed out some facts. But the best was the summary: "Stockfish vs AlphaZero is very much a comparison of apples to orangutans"
:D


Why ? Is the first playing Chess (in know for sure that SF plays chess) and the other is playing Othello ?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u-NyH_rKCwE
User avatar
Laskos
Posts: 10948
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 10:21 pm
Full name: Kai Laskos

Re: Reactions about AlphaZero from top GMs...

Post by Laskos »

Nay Lin Tun wrote:
Laskos wrote:
kranium wrote:Interesting reactions about AlphaZero from top GMs at the London Chess Classic, and a lengthy comment from Tord Romstad:

https://www.chess.com/news/view/alphaze ... ish-author

link to the video clips from above article:
https://www.twitch.tv/videos/207621332
Strange Tord nitpicking on time control issue. That's a bit silly for a 28-0 score. Other thing of Tord and of some GMs are interesting.
That is exactly what I would like to say. Although we dont know exactly how many times AZ got hardware bonus than SF ( Let us say 100 times) but AZ chess skill is at least comparable or superior than Stockfish. A 20 years old chess program fritz 3 on 100 times hardware cant beat current stockfish. ( The only nitpick I would like to blame google is that they used 1GB ram whereas 8GB is standard for mid range PC in the market )
Yes, but Tord also said the most important thing, IMO. In maybe 5 years, the times of low budget single brilliant author or 1-2-3 brilliant authors of close to top engines will end. Massive hardware (and budget) will be needed for training the networks, and such giants as Google or whatever have a decisive advantage. Maybe at top will be 2-3 large distributed projects aside from some large companies. Seems a pretty gloomy future.
Last edited by Laskos on Sun Dec 10, 2017 11:35 am, edited 1 time in total.
corres
Posts: 3657
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2015 11:41 am
Location: hungary

Re: Reactions about AlphaZero from top GMs...

Post by corres »

[quote="Eelco de Groot"]
...
It is not just about the demonstration of learning, it is about the inherent superiority of their very different approach to tackling artificial chessplaying, ...
[/quote]

I agree.
The "normal" chess engines can not use effectively a hardware owing much more than 64 cores.
But AlphaZero using a more bigger and more complicated hardware can enhance further not only the Elo number but the playing quality of the chess playing machines.
corres
Posts: 3657
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2015 11:41 am
Location: hungary

Re: Reactions about AlphaZero from top GMs...

Post by corres »

[quote="Eelco de Groot"]

Look Anil, this is supposed to be a discussion forum, it's not the TCEC chat, not a freefight match or a Monty Python sketch. Please keep the noise level down a bit. We're just trying to have some fun here. Thank you.

[/quote]

As if I would have been say....