Maybe a static link would help.
Might be slightly different versions of the compiler compared to the DLL files on the other system.
For how many of these are there functional Linux versions?
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
Dann Corbit
- Posts: 12540
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:57 pm
- Location: Redmond, WA USA
Re: For how many of these are there functional Linux version
Taking ideas is not a vice, it is a virtue. We have another word for this. It is called learning.
But sharing ideas is an even greater virtue. We have another word for this. It is called teaching.
But sharing ideas is an even greater virtue. We have another word for this. It is called teaching.
-
elcabesa
- Posts: 855
- Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 1:32 pm
Re: For how many of these are there functional Linux version
Sorry it's my fault.Volker Pittlik wrote:Both would be interesting for me. I tried the makefile from github. It works fine but the resulting Vajolet2 2.3.1 exe caused a memory access violation.elcabesa wrote:Vajolet can be compiled for linux and raspberry if you like
Volker
Edit makefile and remove -static options from the linker. It should be at line 133.
Retry by doing
Make clean
Make all
Now it should work
-
Volker Pittlik
- Posts: 619
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 9:10 pm
- Location: Murten / Morat, Switzerland
- Full name: Volker Pittlik
Re: For how many of these are there functional Linux version
Already found out, please see the other thread. Your program runs fine here now. I also recommend to avoid the .exe suffix. Otherwise my Linux tries to start it with wine.elcabesa wrote:...
Sorry it's my fault.
Edit makefile and remove -static options from the linker. It should be at line 133.
Retry by doing
Make clean
Make all
Now it should work
Thank you for this engine!
Volker