will briefly post here, as everyone understands I can not physically post in 3 threads, 10 subthreads, while answering the messages of 20 unfriendly users.
ust do not know what to say, but it will better to just remain silent and let the truth out in the future.
it will certainly out, truth always outs.
well, let me just count the number of haters, to have things clear:
- Roberto Possioto (che possa morire
, just kidding, do you understand Italian?)
- Jeroen Noomen
- Andreas Strangmueller
- Guenther Simon
- Bram Mourik(why did you join, Bram?)
- Kai Laskos( you certainly have some problems, Kai)
- Vincent Lejeune( that one was not such a hater, maybe my anti-Rybka sentiments threw him off balance?); nul nést prophete dans sons pays, Vincent, nul
- Herbert L. (this one is certainly a spammer, and definitely a Rybka follower, too bad for him)
- etc., etc., I already forgot the rest, drained by stupidity and obnoxiousness
dozens of them.
why are you really so bad, so hating?
so far, no one has proven the ending, either with or without rooks, is lost for black, why should the burden of proof be on me?
I am alone, and you are dozens.
chess is played with probabilities, and black always has good drawing chances in this ending, Carlsen and Aronian are not unerrable.
stats in terms of drawn games are also quite good for black, so I made the right choice.
why no one is comenting my Bd6 line, a rich mg position, and vital for the assessment if a3 pawn should be captured?
because you know I am right and Bd6 retreat scores better for white, right?
I was right the pawn on a3 should be captured, Carlsen too, at least we are on the same side with Magnus.
after Bd6 c5 Bc7 e4, white wins almost by force, why do not you have the courage to comment/analyse this?
because you are good, only when you run SF on strong hardware on simple endgames, right?
when it is difficult to go astray.
but are completely helpless in a rich mg position.
Andreas is showing some fortresses, possibly debunked in some 50 moves(!), 100 plies, by engine output.
do you know what 100 plies in chess are, Andreas?
the engine could certainly have gone wrong somewhere.
people only concentrate on positions where I might have gone wrong, not mentioning the many more when I have been completely right.
why so?
because you are haters?
and, even if I have gone wrong somewhere, this has been very much human, and my lines have been still very strong indeed, if you need a couple of hours SF analysis to show some possible weakness, and that at depth 60+
finding a win at depth 60+ is not a big mistake, if available, by any standard.
why do not you mention the alternatives?
as said, a3 capture is forced.
what is the alternative?
I want to thank a few people here, for not joining into the hateful bashing:
- thank you, Eelco, for that
- thank you, jon, that you stopped when this was due
- thank you, Peter, that did not bother me with one more opponent
I remember the good all times, when people were not that hateful.
where are you, Carl?
where are you, Louis?