The "Cfish-vanilla.exe" binary is fastest for me.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0zfnehxzq7ery ... er.7z?dl=0
New CFish Windows binary (from today's code)
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 12541
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:57 pm
- Location: Redmond, WA USA
New CFish Windows binary (from today's code)
Taking ideas is not a vice, it is a virtue. We have another word for this. It is called learning.
But sharing ideas is an even greater virtue. We have another word for this. It is called teaching.
But sharing ideas is an even greater virtue. We have another word for this. It is called teaching.
-
- Posts: 142
- Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2015 12:30 pm
Re: New CFish Windows binary (from today's code)
Thanks, Dann. Do you have any speed comparison data with the original program?
-
- Posts: 12541
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:57 pm
- Location: Redmond, WA USA
Re: New CFish Windows binary (from today's code)
It is hard to make a clear standardized comparison because the bench changed and Cfish does not have the new positions.giovanni wrote:Thanks, Dann. Do you have any speed comparison data with the original program?
It is a lot faster for me, depending on the position, up to twice as fast.
For me, the "vanilla" version is fastest.
Taking ideas is not a vice, it is a virtue. We have another word for this. It is called learning.
But sharing ideas is an even greater virtue. We have another word for this. It is called teaching.
But sharing ideas is an even greater virtue. We have another word for this. It is called teaching.
-
- Posts: 213
- Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2013 8:19 pm
Re: New CFish Windows binary (from today's code)
The vanilla or modern binary is not working on my popcount system
-
- Posts: 1735
- Joined: Sun Dec 13, 2009 6:09 pm
Re: New CFish Windows binary (from today's code)
Hi Paul,
Have you tried to compile it?
I just go to the folder where the source is, open a windows console, type "make clean" and then type "make cfish" (without quotes)
It worked for me.
Regards,
Carlos
Have you tried to compile it?
I just go to the folder where the source is, open a windows console, type "make clean" and then type "make cfish" (without quotes)
It worked for me.
Regards,
Carlos
-
- Posts: 1339
- Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 9:43 am
- Location: New Delhi, India
Re: New CFish Windows binary (from today's code)
Modern version is really fast and good on my System.Dann Corbit wrote:The "Cfish-vanilla.exe" binary is fastest for me.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0zfnehxzq7ery ... er.7z?dl=0
How can I get a BMI version ?
i7 5960X @ 4.1 Ghz, 64 GB G.Skill RipJaws RAM, Twin Asus ROG Strix OC 11 GB Geforce 2080 Tis
-
- Posts: 3291
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:15 pm
Re: New CFish Windows binary (from today's code)
"twice as fast"? According to "bench" CFish is 12,5% faster than abrok compile. But for some reason Cfish loses almost 10% of games in LittleBlitzer, when time control is 10s + 0,1s! SF and asmFish only may be once in 500 games normally. Why?
Jouni
-
- Posts: 5566
- Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 11:56 pm
Re: New CFish Windows binary (from today's code)
Do you mean it loses on time? It should not behave differently in this respect from Stockfish, but this is not something that I have tested very well.Jouni wrote:"twice as fast"? According to "bench" CFish is 12,5% faster than abrok compile. But for some reason Cfish loses almost 10% of games in LittleBlitzer, when time control is 10s + 0,1s! SF and asmFish only may be once in 500 games normally. Why?
If the losses are not time losses but crashes, then I might be about to fix it (yesterday I noticed a problem which I will look into as soon as I have time).
-
- Posts: 3291
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:15 pm
Re: New CFish Windows binary (from today's code)
Yes I mean time losses as seen in this log:
If I raise inc to 200ms no help!
Code: Select all
Games Completed = 76 of 1000 (Avg game length = 28.774 sec)
Settings = Gauntlet/256MB/10000ms+100ms/M 450cp for 4 moves, D 100 moves/EPD:10moves_SALC_500.epd(500)
Time = 567 sec elapsed, 6892 sec remaining
1. Cfish 121016 64 POPCNT 45.5/76 33-18-25 (L: m=0 t=6 i=0 a=12) (D: r=18 i=0 f=0 s=0 a=7) (tpm=271.9 d=17.15 nps=2092287)
2. Komodo 10 64-bit 30.5/76 18-33-25 (L: m=0 t=0 i=0 a=33) (D: r=18 i=0 f=0 s=0 a=7) (tpm=265.3 d=15.68 nps=1913349)
Jouni
-
- Posts: 3291
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:15 pm
Re: New CFish Windows binary (from today's code)
Average time per move (tpm) is for Cfish clearly bigger than Komodo's. Normal SF (abrok) uses less time always.
Code: Select all
Games Completed = 46 of 1000 (Avg game length = 27.040 sec)
Settings = Gauntlet/256MB/10000ms+100ms/M 450cp for 4 moves, D 100 moves/EPD:10moves_SALC_500.epd(500)
Time = 326 sec elapsed, 6758 sec remaining
1. Stockfish 260916 64 BMI2 30.0/46 21-7-18 (L: m=0 t=0 i=0 a=7) (D: r=13 i=3 f=0 s=0 a=2) (tpm=255.7 d=17.04 nps=1805392)
2. Komodo 10 64-bit 16.0/46 7-21-18 (L: m=0 t=0 i=0 a=21) (D: r=13 i=3 f=0 s=0 a=2) (tpm=267.2 d=15.86 nps=1936614)
Jouni