How fast was the Cray?
Posted: Fri Sep 23, 2016 12:57 pm
That was a reason for the high price of this machines : memory !hgm wrote:...
The Cray had wonderful memory bandwidth, and could stream 64-bit data from and to memory at the clock speed of the CPU. Modern CPUs can only do that from their (tiny) level 1 cache.
80MHz?hgm wrote:The Cray had wonderful memory bandwidth, and could stream 64-bit data from and to memory at the clock speed of the CPU.
IIRC Cray Y-MP appeared in 1988 or so. The OP picture is from 1984, and I assumed they used Cray-1M or similar with 80MHz.hgm wrote:The one I calculated on (Cray Y-MP) was double that (167 MHz).
The cray 1, yes. The machine used to win the 1983 WCCC was the first XMP-2 prototype, two cpus, 8.333 nanosecond clock speed, rather than the 12.5ns of the original Cray-1.Laskos wrote:80MHz?hgm wrote:The Cray had wonderful memory bandwidth, and could stream 64-bit data from and to memory at the clock speed of the CPU.
It ended up at a 6ns clock, although most were shipped at 6.1ns.hgm wrote:The one I calculated on (Cray Y-MP) was double that (167 MHz).
That photo was taken at the end of the 1983 WCCC event in NYC. We were, as I said, running on the Cray XMP prototype which was an 8ns machine with two cpus. In 1984 we won the ACM event running on the next version of this, the XMP-4 with 4 cpus. The YMP was the machine we used to win the 1986 WCCC event in Cologne, it had 8 cpus and a 6ns clock speed.Laskos wrote:IIRC Cray Y-MP appeared in 1988 or so. The OP picture is from 1984, and I assumed they used Cray-1M or similar with 80MHz.hgm wrote:The one I calculated on (Cray Y-MP) was double that (167 MHz).
BTW FF choked on that photo. That is Bert Gower on the far right, not Harry Nelson. I am not sure where Harry was when that was taken, he might have already left NYC to return to Lawrence-Livermore.