3520 games with 10 losses on time. With a performance of 44% that would be about 4 point more in total (in average). That is about 0.3% performance loss ... nothing I would worry about!
You have my respect for keeping your promise so right on time http://talkchess.com/forum/viewtopic.ph ... ghlight=me
Simply because of historical reasons Hannibal is to be expected that the pyrenees must not be an obstacle. In this case the engine will push Andscas (from Andorra, Pyrenees) from the 10th place and Naum does not longer belong to the top 16 of the Ipon list.
Subject to the requirement that Hannibal is the Carthaginian commander who crossed the alps and not the cannibalic serial killer!
3520 games with 10 losses on time. With a performance of 44% that would be about 4 point more in total (in average). That is about 0.3% performance loss ... nothing I would worry about!
Ingo
Thanks Ingo! Nice to see it in the top 10. Hopefully Daniel don't release new Andscacs soon, else will be out of the top 10.
I tried a compile for Windows XP. Message me if you want to beta test it for me. As soon as someone tells us it works, we will include it in the download package.
BubbaTough wrote:I tried a compile for Windows XP. Message me if you want to beta test it for me. As soon as someone tells us it works, we will include it in the download package.
-Sam
Hi Sam,
I am willing to beta test your new Hannibal 1.7 engine. Not sure what are the pre-requisites to qualify though.
But I have a bunch of test suites and games which I could use to check. Most of my test suites are taken from public domain although I have some of my own too, which was slightly tweaked positions from my actual games. I have also just replied to your private msg.
cdani wrote:Just to comment it, I leave unused upto 3 x increment time, so should be impossible that Andscacs loses on time. If it happens is something of the operating system.