'Alternative' is not the same as 'equivalent'. Of two ways for achieving the same thing one can be easy, the other hard, one can be a pleasure, and the other can utterly suck. In the quoted post you voice an opinion about the relative quality of these alternatives, and it is that opinion I asked you to substantiate for the benefit of the readers. So far you failed to do much of that, though.Daniel Mehrmann wrote:Guenther wrote: Don't you think that sounds completely different now to what you said first?
Daniel Mehrmann wrote:Cutechess-cli is so much better for tourneys like xboard.
No, because i wrote in this message:
Just take one statement without the message context makes the world easy of course! And again: It was my personal experince!This is an alternative way to do the same things.
That seems a quite natural request to me, and certainly no reason to go ballistic over.
Note that you brought this inquiry entirely on yourself; if you would just have wanted to point out it was an alternative, you could have done it perfectly well without the sentence "Cutechess-cli is so much better for tourneys like xboard" (presumably meaning "Cutechess-cli is so much better for tourneys than xboard", now that English grammar has also become a subject of this discussion).