Re: 2016 10th Annual World Computer Rapid Chess Championship
Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2016 8:40 am
I am willing to operate Zurichess on my laptop if he is okay with it.
Computer Chess Club
https://talkchess.com/
Thank you Charles & Steve!CRoberson wrote: Thanks for the info. You are allowed to use an operator. If you post a thread to that in the main forum, you might get one. Others have done it before.
Code: Select all
Account zurichess expired 10/Jan/2016
I think it would be fine for tournaments like this to live in the tournament forum if they were made sticky, so they wouldn't roll off the first page. It would require coordination with the mods of course.gerold wrote:Very good.Harvey Williamson wrote:At Charles request this is now back in the main section.CRoberson wrote:Note to MODERATORS: Please do NOT move this to the tournament section. Historically all tournaments of this type are announced here. The tournament
section is really more of a testers section and burying the post there will lead to lower participation levels.
Forum is back to normal.
Best,
Gerold.
Being sticky in the tournament forum is of course an option. However engine authors have made it clear that they prefer a normal thread in this section.mhull wrote:I think it would be fine for tournaments like this to live in the tournament forum if they were made sticky, so they wouldn't roll off the first page. It would require coordination with the mods of course.gerold wrote:Very good.Harvey Williamson wrote:At Charles request this is now back in the main section.CRoberson wrote:Note to MODERATORS: Please do NOT move this to the tournament section. Historically all tournaments of this type are announced here. The tournament
section is really more of a testers section and burying the post there will lead to lower participation levels.
Forum is back to normal.
Best,
Gerold.
Even here, it's not made sticky which is not good. Tournaments where multiple authors will be in attendance should be sticky "by default". If this is done, then it can live in the proper forum which is the tournament forum.
Make big invitational tournaments sticky, always. Then it won't matter if it's in the "high volume" tournament forum (where they really belong).
But even here it's not sticky. I think events like this should be at least until the event is concluded.Harvey Williamson wrote:Being sticky in the tournament forum is of course an option. However engine authors have made it clear that hey prefer a normal thread in this section.mhull wrote:I think it would be fine for tournaments like this to live in the tournament forum if they were made sticky, so they wouldn't roll off the first page. It would require coordination with the mods of course.gerold wrote:Very good.Harvey Williamson wrote:At Charles request this is now back in the main section.CRoberson wrote:Note to MODERATORS: Please do NOT move this to the tournament section. Historically all tournaments of this type are announced here. The tournament
section is really more of a testers section and burying the post there will lead to lower participation levels.
Forum is back to normal.
Best,
Gerold.
Even here, it's not made sticky which is not good. Tournaments where multiple authors will be in attendance should be sticky "by default". If this is done, then it can live in the proper forum which is the tournament forum.
Make big invitational tournaments sticky, always. Then it won't matter if it's in the "high volume" tournament forum (where they really belong).
I have no problem with the main tournaments being made sticky here until they are concluded. If a tournament organiser requests this I will discuss with the other mods.mhull wrote:
But even here it's not sticky. I think events like this should be at least until the event is concluded.
Sounds like a plan!hgm wrote: So a sensible way to treat situations like this seems to let the original poster create separate threads for the original announcement and the further discussion, giving a link to the latter in the former. The announcement can then be made sticky and locked at the same time. This prevents a sticky thread becoming very long (which could be annoying for non-interested people using threaded view).