Chiron 3 released

[AdminX]

Yeah, Give me a second to gather the data for you.

[AdminX]

Thanks,
do you have the games on the Shredder PC too? So we can see evalutions of Shredder.
I made a test for CEGT 40/20

1 Fizbo 1.9 x64 1CPU +81 +35/=53/-12 61.50% 61.5/100
2 Chiron 4.0 x64 1CPU -81 +12/=53/-35 38.50% 38.5/100

Here Chiron scored around 3059 - about 100 points behind Shredder.

Here is the link:

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B7CrV ... ksyVXNEWUE

[AdminX]

Thanks,
do you have the games on the Shredder PC too? So we can see evalutions of Shredder.
I made a test for CEGT 40/20

1 Fizbo 1.9 x64 1CPU +81 +35/=53/-12 61.50% 61.5/100
2 Chiron 4.0 x64 1CPU -81 +12/=53/-35 38.50% 38.5/100

Here Chiron scored around 3059 - about 100 points behind Shredder.

From the Chiron website in the FAQ section it states:

"With 4 threads, Chiron is about 100 Elo points stronger than the single thread version."

On the systems I used 4 cores/ 4 threads for each engine.

[Werner]

Thank you very much.
I will make a testmatch too between these 2 engines for CEGT 40/20 and I will use 50 of your openings here.

[Sylwy]

http://talkchess.com/forum/viewtopic.ph ... 45&t=50060

[AdminX]

Just started doing a small test (50 Games) versus Deep Shredder 13 @5+3 using Shredder GUI and Autoplayer 232 via serial cable.

I had a automatic reboot which crashed my 1st run on game 35, so I restarted the test and combined the results.

Very surprising result
Can you please post the games with evalutations ?

Okay, something must have been wrong or it was some kind of a fluke. Running test again, this time no autoplayer and the results are turning out much different. This time it's currently in the favor of Shredder (+10 =14 -4). Each engine using two cores.

[MikeB]

Just started doing a small test (50 Games) versus Deep Shredder 13 @5+3 using Shredder GUI and Autoplayer 232 via serial cable.

I had a automatic reboot which crashed my 1st run on game 35, so I restarted the test and combined the results.

Very surprising result
Can you please post the games with evalutations ?

Okay, something must have been wrong or it was some kind of a fluke. Running test again, this time no autoplayer and the results are turning out much different. This time it's currently in the favor of Shredder (+10 =14 -4). Each engine using two cores.

I have seen 2000 to 3000 game flukes - so flukes do happen... 50 game flukes are pretty common... more common than you might think

[Werner]

I have tried to find the reason for that result with you games, but I failed.
My result :
1 Deep Shredder 13 x64 1CPU +131 +44/=48/-8 68.00% 68.0/100
2 Chiron 4.0 x64 1CPU -131 +8/=48/-44 32.00% 32.0/100

[IWB]

I have tried to find the reason for that result with you games, but I failed.
My result :
1 Deep Shredder 13 x64 1CPU +131 +44/=48/-8 68.00% 68.0/100
2 Chiron 4.0 x64 1CPU -131 +8/=48/-44 32.00% 32.0/100

At 5 + 3 P-ON I have:

Shredder 13 vs Chiron 4 : 220 ( +90, =118, -12), 67.7 : +120

67.7% vs your 68.0%, amazingly equal ...

Ingo