Re: Stockfish 7 beta 1
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2015 5:48 pm
hereby https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BzGb6 ... HdsLVdGUzAFriedmannC wrote:Great work, Bram, can you post a pgn file of the games?
Page 3 of 3
Re: Stockfish 7 beta 1
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2015 8:22 pm
If you have a Mac, the two exe's enclosed in the zip folder below will most likely be the fastest. "Hand tuned"* for the bmi2 processor, and the other for popcnt. You may have to change permissions "chmod 755" to enable it for your machine. Over 2M nps on the Mac Pro and 2.7M nps on the iMaczamar wrote:Stockfish 7 beta 1 is out.
We would kindly ask rating list authors and other interested parties to do test runs with this version and report any encountered issues in this thread.
Stockfish for the Mac
* "Hand tuned" here means that I modified the makefile options to produce the absolute fastest exe's on my 2010 Mac Pro and and 2015 iMac Could be anywhere 10-15% faster than and standard created exe for the Mac. (ymmv).
Re: Stockfish 7 beta 1
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2015 9:32 pm
Thanks for a detailed report, Peter!
It's a pity that patching source code is required... But your change looks fine. Clearly this a problem with NDK, so there is not much we can do on our side.
Thanks!
It's a pity that patching source code is required... But your change looks fine. Clearly this a problem with NDK, so there is not much we can do on our side.
Thanks!
Re: Stockfish 7 beta 1
Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2015 1:06 am
Interesting; as Lucas is no doubt aware (but I'll say it for people less involved with software development), tools that feed random data to a program are called "fuzzers", and they are used to uncover bugs.lucasart wrote:POS 1.2 is rated 230 elo weaker than RAM 2.0, which is a RANDOM MOVER! So you're looking at a quality of chess worse than random moves!mvk wrote: The "artificial" position is from a CCRL 40/4 game. (GrayMatter SVN1604 vs POS 1.20, date 2012-07-16).
The fact that these patzers cannot even mate the opponent with 4 queens should already give you a hint, don't you think ?
Clearly an artificial position.
Maybe running depth 1 SF vs RAM could reveal some other issues?
Re: Stockfish 7 beta 1
Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2015 9:17 am
A proposition: Can we get out of "64" in engine name now? Because it's standard nowadays so only "32" is needed!
Re: Stockfish 7 beta 1
Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2015 12:52 pm
a second testrun on my AMD 1090T @3200 Mhz 4cpu, (Fritzmark 16,1)beram wrote:First testrun on my i5 4200M, 2 cores, 512mB hash, privat testbook 25 lines
53,5 % out of 100games in line with earlier results of SF devs from dec 2015Code: Select all
SF 7beta - - Komodo 9.3 Blitz 3m2s i5 4200M @2500Mhz, 2 cpu (Fritzmark 5,1) 1 Stockfish 7Beta1 64 BMI2 +24 +22/=63/-15 53.50% 53.5/100 2 Komodo 9.3 64-bit -24 +15/=63/-22 46.50% 46.5/100
Code: Select all
SF 051215 - Komodo 9.3 Blitz 3m2s i5 4200M @2500Mhz, 2 cpu (Fritzmark 5,1) 1 Stockfish 051215 64 BMI2 +21 +27/=52/-21 53.00% 53.0/100 2 Komodo 9.3 64-bit -21 +21/=52/-27 47.00% 47.0/100 SF 141215 - Komodo 9.3 Blitz 3m2s i5 4200M @2500Mhz, 2 cpu (Fritzmark 5,1) 1 Stockfish 141215 64 BMI2 +7 +18/=66/-16 51.00% 51.0/100 2 Komodo 9.3 64-bit -7 +16/=66/-18 49.00% 49.0/100 SF 201215 - Komodo 9.3 Blitz 3m2s i5 4200M @2500Mhz, 2 cpu (Fritzmark 5,1) 1 Stockfish 201215 64 BMI2 +31 +25/=59/-16 54.50% 54.5/100 2 Komodo 9.3 64-bit -31 +16/=59/-25 45.50% 45.5/100
SF7 beta 59,5%
Code: Select all
SF 7beta - Komodo 9.3, Blitz 3m+2s
1 Stockfish 7Beta1 64 +67 +29/=61/-10 59.50% 59.5/100
2 Komodo 9.3 64-bit -67 +10/=61/-29 40.50% 40.5/100Re: Stockfish 7 beta 1
Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2015 2:00 pm
Hi Michael,MikeB wrote:If you have a Mac, the two exe's enclosed in the zip folder below will most likely be the fastest. "Hand tuned"* for the bmi2 processor, and the other for popcnt. You may have to change permissions "chmod 755" to enable it for your machine. Over 2M nps on the Mac Pro and 2.7M nps on the iMac
Stockfish for the Mac
* "Hand tuned" here means that I modified the makefile options to produce the absolute fastest exe's on my 2010 Mac Pro and and 2015 iMac Could be anywhere 10-15% faster than and standard created exe for the Mac. (ymmv).
thanks a lot for your compiles, I appreciate them very much!
On my Macbook did just "make profile-build ARCH=x86-64-modern COMP=gcc“ and get this bench result:
Code: Select all
$ ./stockfish bench > /dev/null
===========================
Total time (ms) : 4035
Nodes searched : 8355485
Nodes/second : 2070752
, but not faster on my system (core i7 3615qm):Code: Select all
$ ./stockfish-7-beta-popcnt bench > /dev/null
===========================
Total time (ms) : 4078
Nodes searched : 8355485
Nodes/second : 2048917-Max
Re: Stockfish 7 beta 1
Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2015 3:13 pm
Stockfish 7 beta 2 is out:
It corrects the following problems:
- Infinite loop when searching in position: 7k/QQQQR3/2B5/4KN1Q/3QQ3/8/8/4R3 b - - 0 1
- Correction for Trace scores for pawns
It corrects the following problems:
- Infinite loop when searching in position: 7k/QQQQR3/2B5/4KN1Q/3QQ3/8/8/4R3 b - - 0 1
- Correction for Trace scores for pawns
Re: Stockfish 7 beta 1
Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2015 11:21 pm
A third run on the AMD 1090T @3200 Mhz 4cpu, (Fritzmark 16,1) with TCEC7 finalbook, SF7beta 54,69%beram wrote:a second testrun on my AMD 1090T @3200 Mhz 4cpu, (Fritzmark 16,1)beram wrote:First testrun on my i5 4200M, 2 cores, 512mB hash, privat testbook 25 lines
53,5 % out of 100games in line with earlier results of SF devs from dec 2015Code: Select all
SF 7beta - - Komodo 9.3 Blitz 3m2s i5 4200M @2500Mhz, 2 cpu (Fritzmark 5,1) 1 Stockfish 7Beta1 64 BMI2 +24 +22/=63/-15 53.50% 53.5/100 2 Komodo 9.3 64-bit -24 +15/=63/-22 46.50% 46.5/100
Code: Select all
SF 051215 - Komodo 9.3 Blitz 3m2s i5 4200M @2500Mhz, 2 cpu (Fritzmark 5,1) 1 Stockfish 051215 64 BMI2 +21 +27/=52/-21 53.00% 53.0/100 2 Komodo 9.3 64-bit -21 +21/=52/-27 47.00% 47.0/100 SF 141215 - Komodo 9.3 Blitz 3m2s i5 4200M @2500Mhz, 2 cpu (Fritzmark 5,1) 1 Stockfish 141215 64 BMI2 +7 +18/=66/-16 51.00% 51.0/100 2 Komodo 9.3 64-bit -7 +16/=66/-18 49.00% 49.0/100 SF 201215 - Komodo 9.3 Blitz 3m2s i5 4200M @2500Mhz, 2 cpu (Fritzmark 5,1) 1 Stockfish 201215 64 BMI2 +31 +25/=59/-16 54.50% 54.5/100 2 Komodo 9.3 64-bit -31 +16/=59/-25 45.50% 45.5/100
SF7 beta 59,5%
Code: Select all
SF 7beta - Komodo 9.3, Blitz 3m+2s 1 Stockfish 7Beta1 64 +67 +29/=61/-10 59.50% 59.5/100 2 Komodo 9.3 64-bit -67 +10/=61/-29 40.50% 40.5/100
Code: Select all
SF 7beta - Komodo 9.3, Blitz 3m+2s
1 Stockfish 7Beta1 64 +33 +14/=42/-8 54.69% 35.0/64
2 Komodo 9.3 64-bit -33 +8/=42/-14 45.31% 29.0/64
Re: Stockfish 7 beta 1
Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2015 8:21 am
Hi Max,Max wrote: Hi Michael,
thanks a lot for your compiles, I appreciate them very much!
On my Macbook did just "make profile-build ARCH=x86-64-modern COMP=gcc“ and get this bench result:
Your binary is only about half the sizeCode: Select all
$ ./stockfish bench > /dev/null =========================== Total time (ms) : 4035 Nodes searched : 8355485 Nodes/second : 2070752
May I ask, which compile options did you change in the Makefile?Code: Select all
$ ./stockfish-7-beta-popcnt bench > /dev/null =========================== Total time (ms) : 4078 Nodes searched : 8355485 Nodes/second : 2048917
-Max
For gcc , try this on your machine
Code: Select all
Section 3.9: CXXFLAGS +=-flto -O2 -mtune=native -mssse3 -mpopcnt -DUSE_POPCNTWith respect to the exe size, I'm using the compressor upx
I then added an alias to the bash_profile:
Code: Select all
alias upxl="/applications/upx/./upx2 --lzma" so from anywhere, when i compile stockfish or crafty, I can compress the exe by typing:
Code: Select all
upxl <filename> -o <output-filename>