jhellis3 wrote:Or you could just use Stockfish MateFinder. It is about 10 Elo weaker, but that is only due to a sometimes slower (more robust) search. I keep it updated fairly regularly.
Do SF still have troubles with 2nd repetitions ?
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 5228
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 9:40 am
- Full name: Vincent Lejeune
Re: Do SF still have troubles with 2nd repetitions ?
We need 2 main branches : One Stockfish to play games and one Stockfish to have accurate analysis.
-
- Posts: 608
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2010 9:44 am
- Location: Australia
Re: Do SF still have troubles with 2nd repetitions ?
Git is such an unuseable pile of shit... How the hell do i get a diff ?
Ok - add ".patch" to the URL.
https://github.com/joergoster/Stockfish ... 5b7d.patch
but the patch no longer applies to master. All this fuss for *maybe* 1 elo.
Ok - add ".patch" to the URL.
https://github.com/joergoster/Stockfish ... 5b7d.patch
but the patch no longer applies to master. All this fuss for *maybe* 1 elo.
-
- Posts: 4563
- Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2006 2:40 am
- Full name:
Re: Do SF still have troubles with 2nd repetitions ?
So you mean it is better to apply the patch to the master to avoid cases of confusion and take the loss of maybe one Elo? By the way, https://github.com/Kingdefender/Stockfi ... repetitionstevenaaus wrote:Git is such an unuseable pile of shit... How the hell do i get a diff ?
Ok - add ".patch" to the URL.
https://github.com/joergoster/Stockfish ... 5b7d.patch
but the patch no longer applies to master. All this fuss for *maybe* 1 elo.
is kept up to date at least as long as automatic merging is straightforward, so you should be able to get diff with master from that. The differences in the files at the time that Jörg committed them are maybe more easily seen in the 'commit history' if that is the proper name for it; https://github.com/joergoster/Stockfish ... ae4cce5b7d
Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first
place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you
are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it.
-- Brian W. Kernighan
place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you
are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it.
-- Brian W. Kernighan
-
- Posts: 608
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2010 9:44 am
- Location: Australia
Re: Do SF still have troubles with 2nd repetitions ?
Yes ... This issue continues to annoy so many people, and will continue to raise it's head as new users come across it.So you mean it is better to apply the patch to the master to avoid cases of confusion and take the loss of maybe one Elo?