Sugar 2.0b x 64.0

[consen]

GUNNARPC, Blitz 1m+1s 0


1 Stockfish 231014 64 SSE4.2 +6 +75/=461/-64 50,92% 305,5/600
2 Sugar v2.0d x64 SSE4.2 -6 +64/=461/-75 49,08% 294,5/600

[mcostalba]

Regarding this engine, if sources are not available, as it seems the case, then it is simply an illegal engine and I have nothing more to add.

Il codice sorgente di Sugar e sempre rilasciato potete controllare i link
_________________

The source code for Sugar and forever released, you can check the links

Regards

M.Z

Where is the link ?

[consen]

Marco Zerbinati give us a link: https://w.w.w.sendspace.com/file/qfjual it is dangerous to visit. I have a virus attach on my pc when I go to this place and push to every link there axept the link where it have a text in light blue:

Click here to start download from sendspace

There I can download the Sugar 2.0 e version.

But I don't fint any Source code in this 7z file.

The Avast anti-virus program talked to me that sendspace link from Marco Zerbinati tried to give me 3 virus.

In that reason, I have dot between the WWW.sendspace so that I not send anyone to this dangerous place.

[Adam Hair]

Regarding this engine, if sources are not available, as it seems the case, then it is simply an illegal engine and I have nothing more to add.

Il codice sorgente di Sugar e sempre rilasciato potete controllare i link
_________________

The source code for Sugar and forever released, you can check the links

Regards

M.Z

Where is the link ?

It appears to be distributed with the source, though I have not checked for differences from the main branch of Stockfish.

Here's a link to the engine and source:
http://www.mediafire.com/download/070t5 ... e+32-64.7z

[Guest71]

4 times this:

GUNNARPC, Blitz 1m+1s 0


1 Stockfish 231014 64 SSE4.2 +6 +75/=461/-64 50,92% 305,5/600
2 Sugar v2.0d x64 SSE4.2 -6 +64/=461/-75 49,08% 294,5/600

Marco Zerbinati give us a link: https://w.w.w.sendspace.com/file/qfjual it is dangerous to visit. I have a virus attach on my pc when I go to this place and push to every link there axept the link where it have a text in light blue:

Click here to start download from sendspace

There I can download the Sugar 2.0 e version.

But I don't fint any Source code in this 7z file.

The Avast anti-virus program talked to me that sendspace link from Marco Zerbinati tried to give me 3 virus.

In that reason, I have dot between the WWW.sendspace so that I not send anyone to this dangerous place.

To Gunnar Hatlevik
will you stop posting nonsense, try to give instead to all "good content".
many of chess testers want serious answer on the Sugar engine question.

[consen]

Anthony R wrote:

4 times this:
consen wrote:
GUNNARPC, Blitz 1m+1s 0


1 Stockfish 231014 64 SSE4.2 +6 +75/=461/-64 50,92% 305,5/600
2 Sugar v2.0d x64 SSE4.2 -6 +64/=461/-75 49,08% 294,5/600

My answers are:

Use your eyes. It is not 4 times but 1 times.

But I show the the difference after 200 games, 247 games, 510 games and 600 games. And you wrote that I show it 4 times with 600 games. Therefore I wrote, use your eyes.

About the virus attach, it don't come exe-files with sugar engine. The attach come from the link to the download. If I push on fault place in this link, the attach begyn and 3 virus tries to attach my pc. But Avira saved me.

[mcostalba]

Here's a link to the engine and source:
http://www.mediafire.com/download/070t5 ... e+32-64.7z

Ok, I have quickly checked the sources.

It is Stockfish from a couple of weeks ago + syzgy tablebases + lage pages

The only difference I found in the actual code is a little change in the way qsearch is called in PV nodes, namely qsearch recurses in a PV node only for the first move, all the others are called with NonPV parameter.

There is also some code to print UCI hashfull info.

That's all. I have found no other differences.

[Guest71]

Here's a link to the engine and source:
http://www.mediafire.com/download/070t5 ... e+32-64.7z

Ok, I have quickly checked the sources.

It is Stockfish from a couple of weeks ago + syzgy tablebases + lage pages

The only difference I found in the actual code is a little change in the way qsearch is called in PV nodes, namely qsearch recurses in a PV node only for the first move, all the others are called with NonPV parameter.

There is also some code to print UCI hashfull info.

That's all. I have found no other differences.

Thanks Marco Costalba, now the "picture" is clear...

[Zerbinati]

https://www.dropbox.com/s/t8gfd1mjaxs5d ... 64.7z?dl=0

[consen]

What is the differences between

2.0e and 2.0Ext