Stockfish 5

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw

lech
Posts: 1136
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 10:02 pm

Re: Stockfish 5

Post by lech »

I was looking through the code and my question is: who is the barbier?' :lol:
A good work and good time to add something. Good lack! :D
Maybe, I can't be friendly, but let me be useful.
Top
ernest
Posts: 2041
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:30 pm

Re: Stockfish 5

Post by ernest »

Werner wrote:BTW: is this the same Version with Syzygy Bases :
Date: Tue May 27 23:55:59 2014 +0200
Timestamp: 1401227759
Hi Werner,

According to Ronald Himself, in http://abrok.eu/stockfish_syzygy/

here it is:

!! latest version !!

Windows x64 for modern computers + sse4.2
Windows x64 for modern computers
Windows x64
Windows 32
Linux x64 for modern computers + sse4.2
Linux x64 for modern computers
Linux x64

Author: Ronald de Man
Date: Sat May 31 12:49:48 2014 +0200
Timestamp: 1401533388

Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' (Stockfish 5)

Note: the versions are called stockfish_syzygy_14053112
Top
leavenfish
Posts: 282
Joined: Mon Sep 02, 2013 8:23 am

Re: Stockfish 5

Post by leavenfish »

Because it is smart to let the engine speak for itself for developmental purposes. It is a good thing.
Top
melajara
Posts: 213
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 4:39 pm

Re: Stockfish 5

Post by melajara »

Would be very nice to have also a syzygy compile.
I'll love to analyze endgames over my iPad and I'm sure I'm not alone :D
Per ardua ad astra
Top
Henk
Posts: 7216
Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:31 am

Re: Stockfish 5

Post by Henk »

Yes Stockfish 5 works fine on my machine too. In a five minute game I see Skipper being slaughtered and a checkmate within 33 moves.
Top
Jamal Bubker
Posts: 326
Joined: Mon May 24, 2010 4:32 pm

Re: Stockfish 5

Post by Jamal Bubker »

Thanks to Marco and the Stockfish team 8-)
Top
Henk
Posts: 7216
Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:31 am

Re: Stockfish 5

Post by Henk »

I think Skipper lost this game because Stockfish has better time management.

[pgn]
[Event "Computer Chess Game"]
[Site "HP"]
[Date "2014.05.31"]
[Round "-"]
[White "Stockfish 5 64 SSE4.2"]
[Black "SkipperWinb"]
[Result "1-0"]
[TimeControl "300"]
[Annotator "1. +0.28"]

1. e4 {+0.28/20} Nf6 2. e5 {+0.53/19 5} Nd5 3. c4 {+0.55/20 7} Nb6 4. Nf3
{+0.58/21 2.9} d6 5. Nc3 {+0.52/20 6} Nc6 6. d4 {+0.55/21 6} Bg4 7. exd6
{+0.55/21 2.9} exd6 8. Be2 {+0.60/22 5} Be7 9. b3 {+0.60/23 3} O-O 10. O-O
{+0.60/22 2.9} Bf5 11. Bd3 {+0.74/20 7} Qd7 12. Re1 {+0.58/20 15} d5 13.
Ne5 {+1.53/22 4} Nxe5 14. Bxf5 {+1.24/24 5} Qxf5 15. Rxe5 {+1.28/25 2.8}
Qd7 16. c5 {+1.24/25 2.8} Nc8 17. Rxd5 {+1.48/20 4} Qc6 18. Rf5
{+1.41/21 17} Bh4 19. Rf4 {+1.44/21 7} Bg5 20. d5 {+1.61/23 7} Qd7 21. Rf3
{+1.67/23 2.5} Bf6 22. Rxf6 {+4.21/24 6} gxf6 23. Qf3 {+4.34/27 2.5} Kg7
24. Bh6+ {+11.79/24 5} Kxh6 25. Qxf6+ {+11.85/24 2.5} Kh5 26. Re1
{+12.14/25 2.5} Re8 27. Rxe8 {+17.07/23 4} Qxe8 28. h3 {+23.01/23 10} Qd7
29. Ne4 {+99.95/120 0.1} Qc6 30. g4# {+99.99/120 0.1}
{Xboard adjudication: Checkmate} 1-0
[/pgn]
Top
User avatar
Dr.Wael Deeb
Posts: 9773
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:44 pm
Location: Amman,Jordan

Re: Stockfish 5

Post by Dr.Wael Deeb »

Henk wrote:I think Skipper lost this game because Stockfish has better time management.

[pgn]
[Event "Computer Chess Game"]
[Site "HP"]
[Date "2014.05.31"]
[Round "-"]
[White "Stockfish 5 64 SSE4.2"]
[Black "SkipperWinb"]
[Result "1-0"]
[TimeControl "300"]
[Annotator "1. +0.28"]

1. e4 {+0.28/20} Nf6 2. e5 {+0.53/19 5} Nd5 3. c4 {+0.55/20 7} Nb6 4. Nf3
{+0.58/21 2.9} d6 5. Nc3 {+0.52/20 6} Nc6 6. d4 {+0.55/21 6} Bg4 7. exd6
{+0.55/21 2.9} exd6 8. Be2 {+0.60/22 5} Be7 9. b3 {+0.60/23 3} O-O 10. O-O
{+0.60/22 2.9} Bf5 11. Bd3 {+0.74/20 7} Qd7 12. Re1 {+0.58/20 15} d5 13.
Ne5 {+1.53/22 4} Nxe5 14. Bxf5 {+1.24/24 5} Qxf5 15. Rxe5 {+1.28/25 2.8}
Qd7 16. c5 {+1.24/25 2.8} Nc8 17. Rxd5 {+1.48/20 4} Qc6 18. Rf5
{+1.41/21 17} Bh4 19. Rf4 {+1.44/21 7} Bg5 20. d5 {+1.61/23 7} Qd7 21. Rf3
{+1.67/23 2.5} Bf6 22. Rxf6 {+4.21/24 6} gxf6 23. Qf3 {+4.34/27 2.5} Kg7
24. Bh6+ {+11.79/24 5} Kxh6 25. Qxf6+ {+11.85/24 2.5} Kh5 26. Re1
{+12.14/25 2.5} Re8 27. Rxe8 {+17.07/23 4} Qxe8 28. h3 {+23.01/23 10} Qd7
29. Ne4 {+99.95/120 0.1} Qc6 30. g4# {+99.99/120 0.1}
{Xboard adjudication: Checkmate} 1-0
[/pgn]
Pay more attention to Skipper's King Safety evaluation my friend....
Dr.D
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….
Top
Henk
Posts: 7216
Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:31 am

Re: Stockfish 5

Post by Henk »

Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:
Henk wrote:I think Skipper lost this game because Stockfish has better time management.

[pgn]
[Event "Computer Chess Game"]
[Site "HP"]
[Date "2014.05.31"]
[Round "-"]
[White "Stockfish 5 64 SSE4.2"]
[Black "SkipperWinb"]
[Result "1-0"]
[TimeControl "300"]
[Annotator "1. +0.28"]

1. e4 {+0.28/20} Nf6 2. e5 {+0.53/19 5} Nd5 3. c4 {+0.55/20 7} Nb6 4. Nf3
{+0.58/21 2.9} d6 5. Nc3 {+0.52/20 6} Nc6 6. d4 {+0.55/21 6} Bg4 7. exd6
{+0.55/21 2.9} exd6 8. Be2 {+0.60/22 5} Be7 9. b3 {+0.60/23 3} O-O 10. O-O
{+0.60/22 2.9} Bf5 11. Bd3 {+0.74/20 7} Qd7 12. Re1 {+0.58/20 15} d5 13.
Ne5 {+1.53/22 4} Nxe5 14. Bxf5 {+1.24/24 5} Qxf5 15. Rxe5 {+1.28/25 2.8}
Qd7 16. c5 {+1.24/25 2.8} Nc8 17. Rxd5 {+1.48/20 4} Qc6 18. Rf5
{+1.41/21 17} Bh4 19. Rf4 {+1.44/21 7} Bg5 20. d5 {+1.61/23 7} Qd7 21. Rf3
{+1.67/23 2.5} Bf6 22. Rxf6 {+4.21/24 6} gxf6 23. Qf3 {+4.34/27 2.5} Kg7
24. Bh6+ {+11.79/24 5} Kxh6 25. Qxf6+ {+11.85/24 2.5} Kh5 26. Re1
{+12.14/25 2.5} Re8 27. Rxe8 {+17.07/23 4} Qxe8 28. h3 {+23.01/23 10} Qd7
29. Ne4 {+99.95/120 0.1} Qc6 30. g4# {+99.99/120 0.1}
{Xboard adjudication: Checkmate} 1-0
[/pgn]
Pay more attention to Skipper's King Safety evaluation my friend....
Dr.D
I have already tried a simple version of King tropism but it was no improvement.
Top

Return to “Computer Chess Club: General Topics”