Page 3 of 4
Re: Sting-sf-45 release
Posted: Fri May 23, 2014 11:53 am
by lech
Master Om wrote:
Thank you for a great Engine. Waiting for the draw fortress detection.
I know that I will do it. All is in my head. The problem is that my dual core machine is too sloow. I need to find a sponsor (i7).
Maybe someone knows a rich men who doesn't like (afraid) an artifical intelligenc and is able help me. Such an engine can be welcome in discusions about the inteligence.
Re: Sting-sf-45 release
Posted: Sat May 24, 2014 9:34 am
by Graham Banks
velmarin wrote:Later I'll put it on my blog,
Popcnt Intel version, and version easily.
Microsoft XP version with OLD_LOCKS.
Marek, maybe you should make an effort and move the code to the new Stockfish,
Not only for performance, even modernize .
Users can compile their machines with system BYO, example.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/t5i3trjj60c0b ... _SF_4.5.7z
Any chance of an exe that works without asking for dll files?
Graham.
Re: Sting-sf-45 release
Posted: Sat May 24, 2014 9:51 am
by velmarin
Graham Banks wrote:
Any chance of an exe that works without asking for dll files?
Graham.
Maybe I missed that detail,
try to xeon:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/4xcs2zhdhyl4e ... 5%20x64.7z
Re: Sting-sf-45 release
Posted: Sat May 24, 2014 10:30 am
by Graham Banks
Thanks. Works well now.
Re: Sting-sf-45 release
Posted: Sat May 24, 2014 12:14 pm
by lech
Thanks Vincent, I think I should add some knovladge to Sting e.g.
[d]k7/1b6/8/3n4/4Q3/8/8/K7 w - - draw
Re: Sting-sf-45 release
Posted: Sat May 24, 2014 10:27 pm
by Paloma
lech wrote:
[d]1K3kB1/8/6p1/7R/8/4b3/8/6n1 w - - bm Rh8;
1...Rh8 2.Kg7 Bh7!! 3.g5 Bf5 4.Kxh8 Bg4 fortress
It is possible (maybe) my idea (without tunning) can return ZERO in some non-draw positions, but I made many to drop it in next depths.
1...Rh8 2.Kg7
Kxh8 is also remis according to 6 men EGTB
3.Bxg6 remis
Problems
Posted: Thu May 29, 2014 9:11 pm
by Graham Banks
Re: Problems
Posted: Fri May 30, 2014 10:15 am
by lech
Thanks Graham, I will take a look at this problem. Perhaps it is a problem with my code. In my testes (32-bit) I found nothing wrong. The code of Stockfish 211 gives many problems for my ideas.
Re: Problems
Posted: Fri May 30, 2014 11:48 am
by Mithu
lech wrote:
Thanks Graham, I will take a look at this problem. Perhaps it is a problem with my code.
In my testes (32-bit) I found nothing wrong. The code of Stockfish 211 gives many problems for my ideas.
Before people jump to the wrong conclusions please correct the spelling mistake. It should be 'TESTS'
Re: Problems
Posted: Fri May 30, 2014 5:21 pm
by Dr.Wael Deeb
Mithu wrote:lech wrote:
Thanks Graham, I will take a look at this problem. Perhaps it is a problem with my code.
In my testes (32-bit) I found nothing wrong. The code of Stockfish 211 gives many problems for my ideas.
Before people jump to the wrong conclusions please correct the spelling mistake. It should be 'TESTS'
During my education in the medical university,no one told us that there are x32 and x64 testes
