My project is to prove that chess engines, without a.i., are able to solve all positions and save a high level of play.
Sting is based on the open source code of Stockfish 211 only and holds on the ELO level.
As earlier, it is "one brain in one head" engine. It means to play and analyze in the same way, without tricks and parameters.
It corrects the version 3 and ends the problem of zugzwangs.
Now Sting can solve such an very difficult for engines position, quickly (dualcore - less than half hour).
[d]5K2/k4p1p/5p1p/1p3p2/bP6/1p6/1P5p/7B w - - bm Ke8(e7);
The next step: how to evoluate the value draw (fortress).
download (only Windows 32-bit exe): http://www.mediafire.com/download/h0b4d ... g-sf-4.zip
Sting-sf-4 release
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 1136
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 10:02 pm
Sting-sf-4 release
Maybe, I can't be friendly, but let me be useful.
-
- Posts: 3245
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 9:10 am
Re: Sting-sf-4 release
Danke schön !
My engine was quite strong till I added knowledge to it.
http://www.chess.hylogic.de
http://www.chess.hylogic.de
-
- Posts: 5228
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 9:40 am
- Full name: Vincent Lejeune
Re: Sting-sf-4 release
I just tested with this position :
[d]8/8/4B3/6p1/7k/8/4pPKP/8 w - - 0 1
But as other engines, it doesn't find that 1.Bg4! is clearly stronger than 1.h3?
1.Bg4 e1Q 2.h3 -> draw !
1.h3 g4! -> 0-1 !
Thanks to you if you are able to correctly evaluate fortress !
[d]8/8/4B3/6p1/7k/8/4pPKP/8 w - - 0 1
But as other engines, it doesn't find that 1.Bg4! is clearly stronger than 1.h3?
1.Bg4 e1Q 2.h3 -> draw !
1.h3 g4! -> 0-1 !
Thanks to you if you are able to correctly evaluate fortress !
-
- Posts: 41473
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
- Location: Auckland, NZ
Re: Sting-sf-4 release
Thanks Marek.lech wrote:My project is to prove that chess engines, without a.i., are able to solve all positions and save a high level of play.
Sting is based on the open source code of Stockfish 211 only and holds on the ELO level.
As earlier, it is "one brain in one head" engine. It means to play and analyze in the same way, without tricks and parameters.
It corrects the version 3 and ends the problem of zugzwangs.
Now Sting can solve such an very difficult for engines position, quickly (dualcore - less than half hour).
[d]5K2/k4p1p/5p1p/1p3p2/bP6/1p6/1P5p/7B w - - bm Ke8(e7);
The next step: how to evoluate the value draw (fortress).
download (only Windows 32-bit exe): http://www.mediafire.com/download/h0b4d ... g-sf-4.zip
Do you know if somebody is producing a 64-bit compile for you?
Regards,
Graham.
gbanksnz at gmail.com
-
- Posts: 1136
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 10:02 pm
Re: Sting-sf-4 release
Hi Graham, sorry but I can't do 64-bit version. It would be some misuse to ask Velmarin.
Hi Vincent, belive me the next version of Sting will find 1.Bg4!! and fortress in this position.
[d]8/8/4B3/6p1/7k/8/4pPKP/8 w - - 0 1
Hi Vincent, belive me the next version of Sting will find 1.Bg4!! and fortress in this position.
[d]8/8/4B3/6p1/7k/8/4pPKP/8 w - - 0 1
Maybe, I can't be friendly, but let me be useful.
-
- Posts: 137
- Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 7:33 pm
Re: Sting-sf-4 release
Yeah, just as i'm reluctant to ask Julien for a Mac compilelech wrote:Hi Graham, sorry but I can't do 64-bit version. It would be some misuse to ask Velmarin.
Cheers,
Kaj
-
- Posts: 2949
- Joined: Mon May 05, 2008 12:16 pm
- Location: Bordeaux (France)
- Full name: Julien Marcel
Re: Sting-sf-4 release
A what ?Kaj Soderberg wrote:Yeah, just as i'm reluctant to ask Julien for a Mac compilelech wrote:Hi Graham, sorry but I can't do 64-bit version. It would be some misuse to ask Velmarin.
Cheers,
Kaj
StingSF4-OSX.
Thanks Marek!
"The only good bug is a dead bug." (Don Dailey)
[Blog: http://tinyurl.com/predateur ] [Facebook: http://tinyurl.com/fbpredateur ] [MacEngines: http://tinyurl.com/macengines ]
[Blog: http://tinyurl.com/predateur ] [Facebook: http://tinyurl.com/fbpredateur ] [MacEngines: http://tinyurl.com/macengines ]
-
- Posts: 137
- Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 7:33 pm
Re: Sting-sf-4 release
This must be some kind of a speedy compile world record or something, or some cosmic phenomenon. Thanks Marek and Marcel !JuLieN wrote:A what ?Kaj Soderberg wrote:Yeah, just as i'm reluctant to ask Julien for a Mac compilelech wrote:Hi Graham, sorry but I can't do 64-bit version. It would be some misuse to ask Velmarin.
Cheers,
Kaj
StingSF4-OSX.
Thanks Marek!
Kaj
-
- Posts: 137
- Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 7:33 pm
Re: Sting-sf-4 release
Oops, Marek and Marcel must have sounded too funny in my head.Kaj Soderberg wrote:This must be some kind of a speedy compile world record or something, or some cosmic phenomenon. Thanks Marek and Marcel !JuLieN wrote:A what ?Kaj Soderberg wrote:Yeah, just as i'm reluctant to ask Julien for a Mac compilelech wrote:Hi Graham, sorry but I can't do 64-bit version. It would be some misuse to ask Velmarin.
Cheers,
Kaj
StingSF4-OSX.
Thanks Marek!
Kaj
I of course meant thanks to Marek and Julien !
Totally coincidental, but anyways...
Cheers, Kaj
-
- Posts: 397
- Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 4:38 am
- Location: Schenectady, NY
Re: Sting-sf-4 release
Hi Marek,lech wrote:... sorry but I can't do 64-bit version...
The TDM-GCC compiler is a Windows 32-bit application that can produce 32 or 64-bit exe files. So there is no reason why you can't create a 64-bit version -- you just won't be able to run it.
TDM-GCC: http://tdm-gcc.tdragon.net/about
Ron