Yes,you're right....Hood wrote:they are not paid by fans.
they can decide to optimize they costs and get money for the smallest effort
They can get huge money for playing a draw that a 4th grader would be ashamed of regards,
Dr.D
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
Yes,you're right....Hood wrote:they are not paid by fans.
they can decide to optimize they costs and get money for the smallest effort
reflectionofpower wrote:heeheeDr.Wael Deeb wrote: Are you kidding me
I have games against Chess Sytem Tal II that will down this game to the deepest archives of the chess history....
To say I am disappointed is a major understatement regards,
Dr.D
I respect them in several ways, but they should not be allowed to quit when they choose and still get paid.Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:Naming them clowns are overevaluation Kim....kgburcham wrote:They should not get paid for draws.
These two funny guys should not be able to offer a draw.
How are these two guys qualified to know that their opponent would play the next 50 moves to a draw?
Money should be deducted for blunders.
What are they getting paid a million dollars each? not sure
so they should deduct $50,000 for each blunder.
maybe they should be deducted $100,000 each for draw.
I used to like the top human matches but after programs got so high level and the programs show how low level the top human players are, I am not amused by these human matches.
These SGM should stick to something entertaining like taking on 50 low level opponents or playing against 10 opponents blindfolded.
draw in 16, now that's funny. I think these two clowns should draw in 14 the next game just to show all the low level fans who's running this circus.
kgburcham
At least the clowns are specific kind of artisits that entertain people and they must possess special skills....
It's more like 2 monkeies who are playing chess after they suffered a severe head trauma....
And even then I think that they'll produce a better chess game regards,
Dr.D
Short draws like this cheapen our sport.kgburcham wrote:I respect them in several ways, but they should not be allowed to quit when they choose and still get paid.
this is not their match, they are just participants.
kgburcham wrote:I respect them in several ways, but they should not be allowed to quit when they choose and still get paid.Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:Naming them clowns are overevaluation Kim....kgburcham wrote:They should not get paid for draws.
These two funny guys should not be able to offer a draw.
How are these two guys qualified to know that their opponent would play the next 50 moves to a draw?
Money should be deducted for blunders.
What are they getting paid a million dollars each? not sure
so they should deduct $50,000 for each blunder.
maybe they should be deducted $100,000 each for draw.
I used to like the top human matches but after programs got so high level and the programs show how low level the top human players are, I am not amused by these human matches.
These SGM should stick to something entertaining like taking on 50 low level opponents or playing against 10 opponents blindfolded.
draw in 16, now that's funny. I think these two clowns should draw in 14 the next game just to show all the low level fans who's running this circus.
kgburcham
At least the clowns are specific kind of artisits that entertain people and they must possess special skills....
It's more like 2 monkeies who are playing chess after they suffered a severe head trauma....
And even then I think that they'll produce a better chess game regards,
Dr.D
this is not their match, they are just participants.
Yeah, getting a straight out fee for just playing is not good. So much per win, lose & draw. That will get the juices flowing AND will making them think more about the $$. To really hurt a person,hit em in the wallet. $100,000 for a win, $50,000 for a loss and $25,000 per draw. This equation will make them play more aggressively. That will make em think.Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:kgburcham wrote:I respect them in several ways, but they should not be allowed to quit when they choose and still get paid.Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:Naming them clowns are overevaluation Kim....kgburcham wrote:They should not get paid for draws.
These two funny guys should not be able to offer a draw.
How are these two guys qualified to know that their opponent would play the next 50 moves to a draw?
Money should be deducted for blunders.
What are they getting paid a million dollars each? not sure
so they should deduct $50,000 for each blunder.
maybe they should be deducted $100,000 each for draw.
I used to like the top human matches but after programs got so high level and the programs show how low level the top human players are, I am not amused by these human matches.
These SGM should stick to something entertaining like taking on 50 low level opponents or playing against 10 opponents blindfolded.
draw in 16, now that's funny. I think these two clowns should draw in 14 the next game just to show all the low level fans who's running this circus.
kgburcham
At least the clowns are specific kind of artisits that entertain people and they must possess special skills....
It's more like 2 monkeies who are playing chess after they suffered a severe head trauma....
And even then I think that they'll produce a better chess game regards,
Dr.D
this is not their match, they are just participants.
Exactly my thoughts....kgburcham wrote:I respect them in several ways, but they should not be allowed to quit when they choose and still get paid.Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:Naming them clowns are overevaluation Kim....kgburcham wrote:They should not get paid for draws.
These two funny guys should not be able to offer a draw.
How are these two guys qualified to know that their opponent would play the next 50 moves to a draw?
Money should be deducted for blunders.
What are they getting paid a million dollars each? not sure
so they should deduct $50,000 for each blunder.
maybe they should be deducted $100,000 each for draw.
I used to like the top human matches but after programs got so high level and the programs show how low level the top human players are, I am not amused by these human matches.
These SGM should stick to something entertaining like taking on 50 low level opponents or playing against 10 opponents blindfolded.
draw in 16, now that's funny. I think these two clowns should draw in 14 the next game just to show all the low level fans who's running this circus.
kgburcham
At least the clowns are specific kind of artisits that entertain people and they must possess special skills....
It's more like 2 monkeies who are playing chess after they suffered a severe head trauma....
And even then I think that they'll produce a better chess game regards,
Dr.D
this is not their match, they are just participants.
I'll go even further for the 42 moves barrier....Graham Banks wrote:Short draws like this cheapen our sport.kgburcham wrote:I respect them in several ways, but they should not be allowed to quit when they choose and still get paid.
this is not their match, they are just participants.
A clause stipulating that draws cannot be agreed until after 30 moves have been played might be an idea worth considering for future matches.
$25,000 per drawreflectionofpower wrote:Yeah, getting a straight out fee for just playing is not good. So much per win, lose & draw. That will get the juices flowing AND will making them think more about the $$. To really hurt a person,hit em in the wallet. $100,000 for a win, $50,000 for a loss and $25,000 per draw. This equation will make them play more aggressively. That will make em think.Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:kgburcham wrote:I respect them in several ways, but they should not be allowed to quit when they choose and still get paid.Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:Naming them clowns are overevaluation Kim....kgburcham wrote:They should not get paid for draws.
These two funny guys should not be able to offer a draw.
How are these two guys qualified to know that their opponent would play the next 50 moves to a draw?
Money should be deducted for blunders.
What are they getting paid a million dollars each? not sure
so they should deduct $50,000 for each blunder.
maybe they should be deducted $100,000 each for draw.
I used to like the top human matches but after programs got so high level and the programs show how low level the top human players are, I am not amused by these human matches.
These SGM should stick to something entertaining like taking on 50 low level opponents or playing against 10 opponents blindfolded.
draw in 16, now that's funny. I think these two clowns should draw in 14 the next game just to show all the low level fans who's running this circus.
kgburcham
At least the clowns are specific kind of artisits that entertain people and they must possess special skills....
It's more like 2 monkeies who are playing chess after they suffered a severe head trauma....
And even then I think that they'll produce a better chess game regards,
Dr.D
this is not their match, they are just participants.
I wish the next time you are moderator Graham, you would change some of the championship rules to prevent this from happening again.Graham Banks wrote:Short draws like this cheapen our sport.kgburcham wrote:I respect them in several ways, but they should not be allowed to quit when they choose and still get paid.
this is not their match, they are just participants.
A clause stipulating that draws cannot be agreed until after 30 moves have been played might be an idea worth considering for future matches.