Thanks!Sylwy wrote:Hi Adam !Adam Hair wrote:According to what Robert told the CCRL, if the GUI sends the paths for multiple table and bit bases, Houdini will use whatever the last path that was sent. He recommended choosing just one of the three available bases and enter the path to them. Don't use more than one.
The pairs:
1.Scorpio+Nalimov, or
2.Scorpio+Gaviota
are OK. Scorpio egbbs are loaded into the RAM memory (and used in search), Nalimov TBS are used to root for a concrete mate. No conflicts !
Regards,
SilvianR
Houdini 3 with Scorpio Bitbases Question
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 3226
- Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 10:31 pm
- Location: Fuquay-Varina, North Carolina
Re: Any conflict
-
- Posts: 1471
- Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2010 12:00 am
Re: Any conflict
For Houdini there is a conflict, it will only use one of the 3 EGTB systems at the time.Sylwy wrote:Hi Adam !Adam Hair wrote:According to what Robert told the CCRL, if the GUI sends the paths for multiple table and bit bases, Houdini will use whatever the last path that was sent. He recommended choosing just one of the three available bases and enter the path to them. Don't use more than one.
The pairs:
1.Scorpio+Nalimov, or
2.Scorpio+Gaviota
are OK. Scorpio egbbs are loaded into the RAM memory (and used in search), Nalimov TBS are used to root for a concrete mate. No conflicts !
Regards,
SilvianR
Robert
-
- Posts: 4467
- Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:19 pm
- Location: IASI - the historical capital of MOLDOVA
- Full name: SilvianR
Re: Any conflict
This means a different architecture !Houdini wrote:For Houdini there is a conflict, it will only use one of the 3 EGTB systems at the time.Sylwy wrote:Hi Adam !Adam Hair wrote:According to what Robert told the CCRL, if the GUI sends the paths for multiple table and bit bases, Houdini will use whatever the last path that was sent. He recommended choosing just one of the three available bases and enter the path to them. Don't use more than one.
The pairs:
1.Scorpio+Nalimov, or
2.Scorpio+Gaviota
are OK. Scorpio egbbs are loaded into the RAM memory (and used in search), Nalimov TBS are used to root for a concrete mate. No conflicts !
Regards,
SilvianR
Robert
Shredder (Nalimov+Shredderbases) , Chiron (Nalimov/Gaviota+Scorpio egbbs), Patzer (Nalimov+Patzer bbs), Yace Paderborn2003 (Nalimov +Yace bbs), Daydreamer (Gaviota+Scorpio egbbs) ..........work very well !
Regards,
SilvianR
-
- Posts: 812
- Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2009 10:09 am
- Location: Spain
Re: Any conflict
So Robert, which setting do you like the most for analysis?Houdini wrote:For Houdini there is a conflict, it will only use one of the 3 EGTB systems at the time.Sylwy wrote:Hi Adam !Adam Hair wrote:According to what Robert told the CCRL, if the GUI sends the paths for multiple table and bit bases, Houdini will use whatever the last path that was sent. He recommended choosing just one of the three available bases and enter the path to them. Don't use more than one.
The pairs:
1.Scorpio+Nalimov, or
2.Scorpio+Gaviota
are OK. Scorpio egbbs are loaded into the RAM memory (and used in search), Nalimov TBS are used to root for a concrete mate. No conflicts !
Regards,
SilvianR
Robert
Thanks.
-
- Posts: 1471
- Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2010 12:00 am
Re: Any conflict
All 3 systems work very well, I don't have any preference.Aser Huerga wrote:So Robert, which setting do you like the most for analysis?
Thanks.
Of course only Nalimov has 6-man bases, but if you're fine with the 5-man tables they're all very good.
Robert
-
- Posts: 4467
- Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:19 pm
- Location: IASI - the historical capital of MOLDOVA
- Full name: SilvianR
Re: For Analysis- only Nalimov/Gaviota
Houdini wrote:All 3 systems work very well, I don't have any preference.Aser Huerga wrote:So Robert, which setting do you like the most for analysis?
Thanks.
Of course only Nalimov has 6-man bases, but if you're fine with the 5-man tables they're all very good.
Robert
Bitbases (Scorpio, for example) will typically not help, to show a mate score. A winning position might be scored +15 or more.
In analysis you need exactity !
SilvianR
-
- Posts: 3548
- Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2012 11:02 pm
Re: For Analysis- only Nalimov/Gaviota
But you may not get to choose. Whichever UCI option the GUI sends to the engine last, is what is used (if I interpret Robert correctly). So for example, I can never use Gaviota tablebases with Houdini under ChessGUI, because ChessGUI sends the Nalimov command after Gaviota. And I have no control over that.
What Houdini needs is a UCI parameter where you tell it which tablebases that you want it to use, like Chiron has.
What Houdini needs is a UCI parameter where you tell it which tablebases that you want it to use, like Chiron has.
-
- Posts: 4467
- Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:19 pm
- Location: IASI - the historical capital of MOLDOVA
- Full name: SilvianR
Re: For Analysis- only Nalimov/Gaviota
Modern Times wrote:
What Houdini needs is a UCI parameter where you tell it which tablebases that you want it to use, like Chiron has.
Correct !
SilvianR
-
- Posts: 1539
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 2:02 pm
Re: Any conflict
In that case I stick with the GTB. As I use only 4pc anyhow which are in memory after very few access I doubt a difference to the Scorpio bitbases at all ... That saves time and energyHoudini wrote:All 3 systems work very well, I don't have any preference.Aser Huerga wrote:So Robert, which setting do you like the most for analysis?
Thanks.
...
Bye
Ingo
-
- Posts: 3548
- Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2012 11:02 pm
Re: Any conflict
For engine matches, I found that with Scorpio bases there was a delay of several seconds while they loaded into memory, and the GUI's engine clock was ticking while that was happening. So not a good idea for blitz matches. (Perhaps this is GUI dependent). So I don't use them.