a question about Rybka...

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderators: bob, hgm, Harvey Williamson

Forum rules
This textbox is used to restore diagrams posted with the [d] tag before the upgrade.
Post Reply
pilgrimdan
Posts: 402
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2011 8:49 pm

a question about Rybka...

Post by pilgrimdan » Sat Sep 01, 2012 9:59 pm

if the code for Fruit had not been made available to the public...

how would Rybka (and other chess engines) be different today...

User avatar
hgm
Posts: 23718
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 9:06 am
Location: Amsterdam
Full name: H G Muller
Contact:

Re: a question about Rybka...

Post by hgm » Sat Sep 01, 2012 10:31 pm

Well, Fabien himself claimed that Fruit did not contain any tricks that were not publicly known before. But I guess Fruit opened the eyes of many people that some of these tricks could be made to work very well.

A Distel
Posts: 3113
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 12:33 pm

Re: a question about Rybka...

Post by A Distel » Sat Sep 01, 2012 10:40 pm

pilgrimdan wrote:if the code for Fruit had not been made available to the public...

how would Rybka (and other chess engines) be different today...
What if Shakespeare had had a test audience for Romeo and Juliet or Hamlet?

bob
Posts: 20555
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 6:30 pm
Location: Birmingham, AL

Re: a question about Rybka...

Post by bob » Sun Sep 02, 2012 4:25 am

pilgrimdan wrote:if the code for Fruit had not been made available to the public...

how would Rybka (and other chess engines) be different today...
Hard to say. Seems like reverse-engineering is a pretty commonly practiced art in computer chess, based on the past couple of years of revelation.

User avatar
jshriver
Posts: 1105
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:41 pm
Location: Morgantown, WV, USA
Contact:

Re: a question about Rybka...

Post by jshriver » Sun Sep 02, 2012 5:01 am

hgm wrote:Well, Fabien himself claimed that Fruit did not contain any tricks that were not publicly known before. But I guess Fruit opened the eyes of many people that some of these tricks could be made to work very well.
Wish this forum had a "like" function

User avatar
jshriver
Posts: 1105
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:41 pm
Location: Morgantown, WV, USA
Contact:

Re: a question about Rybka...

Post by jshriver » Sun Sep 02, 2012 5:04 am

bob wrote: Hard to say. Seems like reverse-engineering is a pretty commonly practiced art in computer chess, based on the past couple of years of revelation.
This makes me paranoid for my own engine. I've written it all 100% from scratch, aside from the glue to the Gaviota egtb code. But since it's 0x80 based I still get paranoid due to "concept" cloning.

The fine line between outright cloning, and creation seems really gray. Once I publish olympus, is there a formal body I could send my code. Not that I'm as concerned about being blacklisted, I'd be curious of how things get rated.

Again I'm doing things 100% from scratch, and even gone so far as to not look at other peoples code. But still curious how just reading posts here, or looking at stats can change ones perspective.

-Josh

Daniel Shawul
Posts: 3757
Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2006 10:34 am
Location: Ethiopia
Contact:

Re: a question about Rybka...

Post by Daniel Shawul » Sun Sep 02, 2012 1:47 pm

And now suddenly we have a flurry of EO discussions in the main forum. Many do not want to see this kind of post here which is why a separate forum is dedicated to it.

Post Reply