Longest Mate

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw

vb4
Posts: 165
Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 5:45 am
Location: NY

Longest Mate

Post by vb4 »

Just letting those of you who are not aware of it but the latest and longest distance to mate is now Mate in 691 !! Thats right you heard 691.

Hope you enjoythis info.
zullil
Posts: 6442
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 12:31 am
Location: PA USA
Full name: Louis Zulli

Re: Longest Mate

Post by zullil »

vb4 wrote:Just letting those of you who are not aware of it but the latest and longest distance to mate is now Mate in 691 !! Thats right you heard 691.

Hope you enjoythis info.
Care to post a link? This is the Internet after all. :D
Dirt
Posts: 2851
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:01 pm
Location: Irvine, CA, USA

Re: Longest Mate

Post by Dirt »

vb4 wrote:Just letting those of you who are not aware of it but the latest and longest distance to mate is now Mate in 691 !! Thats right you heard 691.
Really a draw by 50 move rule, I'd bet.
vb4
Posts: 165
Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 5:45 am
Location: NY

Ask and you shall receive

Post by vb4 »

Sven
Posts: 4052
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 9:57 pm
Location: Berlin, Germany
Full name: Sven Schüle

Re: Ask and you shall receive

Post by Sven »

Where is the "691"? Can't see it in the thread linked to above.

Sven
User avatar
Ajedrecista
Posts: 1969
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 9:04 pm
Location: Madrid, Spain.

Definitive explanation.

Post by Ajedrecista »

Hello!
Sven Schüle wrote:
Where is the "691"? Can't see it in the thread linked to above.

Sven
Sorry for bumping this topic, but I think that I have found an explanation: I thought that Les had confused moves with half-moves (AKA plies). The number 691 does not appear directly in the link he gave, although there are some download links that contain that info. Here is the link where Les took 691:

http://217.112.41.81/longest_BPP_update.rar

That link was posted on July, 5th; the position with checkmate in 691 half-moves is the next one:

[d]B7/NK6/2P5/8/8/2p5/kb6/8 w - -

The file is named kbnp6kbp.pgn

-----------------------

But I found a longer mate in a link posted on May, 25th:

http://217.112.41.81/longest.rar

I was able to merge all those PGN files into one thanks to this Rybka Forum topic of 2008: George Tsavdaris explained how to create a .bat utility for merge PGN files, and I did exactly the same. Here is the code of Merge_PGN.bat:

Code: Select all

type *.pgn >> All.pgn
Then, I opened the merged file made with Merge_PGN.bat with Notepad and searched one by one, until I found a checkmate in 1090 half-moves:

[d]8/6R1/8/6N1/3k1K2/1B6/7n/7q w - -

The file is named krbnkqn.pgn

I think that this explains everything. Have fun!

Regards from Spain.

Ajedrecista.
rbarreira
Posts: 900
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 3:48 pm

Re: Longest Mate

Post by rbarreira »

Dirt wrote:
vb4 wrote:Just letting those of you who are not aware of it but the latest and longest distance to mate is now Mate in 691 !! Thats right you heard 691.
Really a draw by 50 move rule, I'd bet.
A lame rule that should disappear or be changed, at least for computer games.
Arpad Rusz
Posts: 273
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 2:34 pm
Location: Budapest

Re: Longest Mate

Post by Arpad Rusz »

rbarreira wrote:
Dirt wrote:
vb4 wrote:Just letting those of you who are not aware of it but the latest and longest distance to mate is now Mate in 691 !! Thats right you heard 691.
Really a draw by 50 move rule, I'd bet.
A lame rule that should disappear or be changed, at least for computer games.
I agree. As I see it, the 50 moves rule is not a basic game rule for chess but only a tournament rule.
There is already a domain were the 50 moves rule was never accepted: endgame study composition.
syzygy
Posts: 5566
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 11:56 pm

Re: Definitive explanation.

Post by syzygy »

Ajedrecista wrote:Then, I opened the merged file made with Merge_PGN.bat with Notepad and searched one by one, until I found a checkmate in 1090 half-moves:

[d]8/6R1/8/6N1/3k1K2/1B6/7n/7q w - -
I was thinking this can't be right, since the longest win in this tablebase is well-known to be 517 (full) moves (see e.g. here, item 316). However, that is 517 moves to conversion. Maximal distance to mate is apparently again quite a few moves more (and achieved by a somewhat different position).
syzygy
Posts: 5566
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 11:56 pm

Re: Longest Mate

Post by syzygy »

Arpad Rusz wrote:
rbarreira wrote:
Dirt wrote:
vb4 wrote:Just letting those of you who are not aware of it but the latest and longest distance to mate is now Mate in 691 !! Thats right you heard 691.
Really a draw by 50 move rule, I'd bet.
A lame rule that should disappear or be changed, at least for computer games.
I agree. As I see it, the 50 moves rule is not a basic game rule for chess but only a tournament rule.
There is already a domain were the 50 moves rule was never accepted: endgame study composition.
I agree that 50 moves is arbitrary, but also computer games must end at some point. Three-fold repetition doesn't really cut it when you get to drawish endgames with very few pawns left. Any other fixed number other than 50 is arbitrary as well. Letting the number of moves depend on available egtb knowledge seems silly to me. At least the 50-move rule is well-established and chess programmers (and tablebase generators) can prepare for it if they choose to do so.

Of course these arguments do not apply to compositions.