How about we settle the WCCC argument? (Branch moved)
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
bob
- Posts: 20943
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:30 pm
- Location: Birmingham, AL
How about we settle the WCCC argument? (Branch moved)
Since you cleverly moved this thread and then locked the notice, I am posting a followup with the SAME subject. Since when does discussion about the WCCC NOT belong in the normal CCC forum? What is wrong with you guys? The thread is NOT about engine origins. I've never seen such a poor example of moderation in my life...
-
hgm
- Posts: 27811
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 10:06 am
- Location: Amsterdam
- Full name: H G Muller
Re: How about we settle the WCCC argument? (Branch moved)
The thread is still in this forum section:
http://www.talkchess.com/forum/viewtopi ... &start=150
Only an off-topic part was moved. As the moderator pointed out...
http://www.talkchess.com/forum/viewtopi ... &start=150
Only an off-topic part was moved. As the moderator pointed out...
-
michiguel
- Posts: 6401
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 8:30 pm
- Location: Chicago, Illinois, USA
Re: How about we settle the WCCC argument? (Branch moved)
This is what we saidbob wrote:Since you cleverly moved this thread and then locked the notice, I am posting a followup with the SAME subject. Since when does discussion about the WCCC NOT belong in the normal CCC forum? What is wrong with you guys? The thread is NOT about engine origins. I've never seen such a poor example of moderation in my life...
All the posts from the last four days were moved to EO. If you do not see all the other posts here is because they are so old that they are located in the second page.
As we said, we did not move the thread, here it is
http://www.talkchess.com/forum/viewtopi ... 15&start=0
It is not our fault that nobody posted anything about WCCC for while and the thread went to the second page, which you did not find for that reason.
What we moved was all the discussion about Rybka, which belongs to EO.
Miguel
EDIT: If you have further questions, please PM.
-
marcelk
- Posts: 348
- Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 12:21 am
Re: How about we settle the WCCC argument? (Branch moved)
To notice that one needs to make an effort reading. Now that would be the day.hgm wrote:The thread is still in this forum section:
http://www.talkchess.com/forum/viewtopi ... &start=150
Only an off-topic part was moved. As the moderator pointed out...
-
hgm
- Posts: 27811
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 10:06 am
- Location: Amsterdam
- Full name: H G Muller
-
bob
- Posts: 20943
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:30 pm
- Location: Birmingham, AL
Re: How about we settle the WCCC argument? (Branch moved)
I was talking about the posts of the last 4 days. The topic of the thread is relevant to CC. Moving it was completely senseless... But don't let that stop things...michiguel wrote:This is what we saidbob wrote:Since you cleverly moved this thread and then locked the notice, I am posting a followup with the SAME subject. Since when does discussion about the WCCC NOT belong in the normal CCC forum? What is wrong with you guys? The thread is NOT about engine origins. I've never seen such a poor example of moderation in my life...
All the posts from the last four days were moved to EO. If you do not see all the other posts here is because they are so old that they are located in the second page.
As we said, we did not move the thread, here it is
http://www.talkchess.com/forum/viewtopi ... 15&start=0
It is not our fault that nobody posted anything about WCCC for while and the thread went to the second page, which you did not find for that reason.
What we moved was all the discussion about Rybka, which belongs to EO.
Miguel
EDIT: If you have further questions, please PM.