Why VITRUVIUS is not tested by CCRL, CEGT etc?
Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2012 10:14 am
This amazing engine has an unique dynamic ans speculative style. Why isn't being tested, regardless the fact that comes as an Ivanhoe derivative?
Computer Chess Club
https://talkchess.com/
http://computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/4040.l ... 11C_32-bitFriedmannC wrote:This amazing engine has an unique dynamic ans speculative style. Why isn't being tested, regardless the fact that comes as an Ivanhoe derivative?
Are there ratings of :Graham Banks wrote:http://computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/4040.l ... 11C_32-bitFriedmannC wrote:This amazing engine has an unique dynamic ans speculative style. Why isn't being tested, regardless the fact that comes as an Ivanhoe derivative?
No.A Distel wrote:Are there ratings of :Graham Banks wrote:http://computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/4040.l ... 11C_32-bitFriedmannC wrote:This amazing engine has an unique dynamic ans speculative style. Why isn't being tested, regardless the fact that comes as an Ivanhoe derivative?
Vitruvius 1.0H HEM x64
Vitruvius 1.0C HEM x64
Thank you for the information!FriedmannC wrote:Vitruvius_1.1SE_HEM_x64 is is the latest version, 30 ELO points stronger than Vitruvius 1!! http://www.vitruviuschess.com/article/A ... ltati.html
So the sooner the tests begin, the better! At 40/40 and on CEGT at long time control: 40/120.
Thank's for the information.Graham Banks wrote:No.A Distel wrote:Are there ratings of :Graham Banks wrote:http://computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/4040.l ... 11C_32-bitFriedmannC wrote:This amazing engine has an unique dynamic ans speculative style. Why isn't being tested, regardless the fact that comes as an Ivanhoe derivative?
Vitruvius 1.0H HEM x64
Vitruvius 1.0C HEM x64
A Distel wrote:Thank you for the information!FriedmannC wrote:Vitruvius_1.1SE_HEM_x64 is is the latest version, 30 ELO points stronger than Vitruvius 1!! http://www.vitruviuschess.com/article/A ... ltati.html
So the sooner the tests begin, the better! At 40/40 and on CEGT at long time control: 40/120.