1:
The "cpu-load" issue has been fully accepted, and is already fixed.
From the buffix Version on, there shouldnt be a problem any longer
with that issue.
2:
We will have now a closer look on the "loading" issue.
3:
Because George used the term "memory", we additionally are checking
Memory-Allocation (context Hash) problems. But, for now this second
point looks like a misunderstanding because of using the term memory,
that has nothing to do with the "cpu-load". But anyway, we are checking
that out, and so far we will have some tiny changes
for the memory-allocation-code (Transtable,Hash), just to be on the
safe (safer) side.
Thx for your report.
Michael
Yes, I used the wrong term. Under memory is where it reflects a hash change, for instance. Your problem is under CPU % the engine is using.
My apologies for the confusion.
,
