Your opinions about the Rybka Cluster Rental

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderators: Harvey Williamson, bob, hgm

Forum rules
This textbox is used to restore diagrams posted with the [d] tag before the upgrade.
User avatar
Dr.Wael Deeb
Posts: 9772
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 7:44 pm
Location: Amman,Jordan

Re: Your opinions about the Rybka Cluster Rental

Post by Dr.Wael Deeb » Sat Jan 01, 2011 9:05 am

perejaslav wrote:Your opinions about the Rybka Cluster Mental ...
You got that right my man :lol:


:wink:
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….

Jouni
Posts: 2227
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 7:15 pm

Re: Your opinions about the Rybka Cluster Rental

Post by Jouni » Sat Jan 01, 2011 9:26 am

I am quite sure this Cluster thing is DOA (Dead On Arrival), even if it were free what's the value of analysis, which don't show real depth/node speed? Example:

[D]2K3k1/1p6/R3p1p1/1rB1P1P1/8/8/1Pb5/8 w - -

Analysis by Rybka Cluster 296 Cores :

1.Rc6 bxc6 2.b4 Be4 3.Kc7 Kf7 4.Kc8 Bd5 5.Kc7 Ke8 6.Kc8 Bh1 7.Kc7 Kf7 8.Kc8 Bg2
-+ (-4.84) Depth: 27 00:04:58 6371mN
1.Rc6 bxc6 2.b4 Be4 3.Kc7 Kf7 4.Kc8 Bd5 5.Kc7 Ke8 6.Kc8 Bh1 7.Kc7 Kf7 8.Kc8 Bg2 9.Kc7 Bd5 10.Kc8
-+ (-4.84) Depth: 27 00:05:25 6961mN

Analysis by Critter 0.90 64-bit 2 cores :) :

1.Rc6 bxc6 2.b4 Be4 3.Kd7 Kf7 4.Kc7 Ke8 5.Kc8 Bg2 6.Kc7 Bd5 7.Bd6 Be4 8.Bc5 Bf3 9.Kc8 Bd5 10.Kc7 Bg2 11.Bd6 Kf7 12.Bc5 Be4 13.Kc8 Bd5 14.Kc7 Rxc5 15.bxc5 Ke7 16.Kc8 Be4
-+ (-3.72) Depth: 27/48 00:00:44 138mN, tb=12795
1.Rc6 bxc6 2.b4 Be4 3.Kd7 Kf7 4.Kc7 Ke8 5.Kc8 Bg2 6.Kc7 Bd5 7.Bd6 Be4 8.Bc5 Bf3 9.Kc8 Bd5 10.Kc7 Bg2 11.Kc8 Bf3 12.Kc7
-+ (-3.72) Depth: 28/48 00:00:57 183mN, tb=21085

Jouni

Damir
Posts: 2427
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 2:53 pm
Location: Denmark
Full name: Damir Desevac

Re: Your opinions about the Rybka Cluster Rental

Post by Damir » Sat Jan 01, 2011 9:58 am

Hey, that's not fair test, Critter is using GTB, Rybka is using none... :lol: :lol:

shiv
Posts: 351
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 12:03 am

Re: Your opinions about the Rybka Cluster Rental

Post by shiv » Sat Jan 01, 2011 10:21 am

Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: Because the parallel efficiency will suck compared to a real parallelized tree search (which I presume Rybka Cluster is using, or it wouldn't be so strong).

Of course, some people here are willing to believe it when the Aquarium guys claim perfect speedups with IDeA, so if you truly believe that then what you propose is better. (And you'll get your ass kicked if you try to play a game with this "perfect speedup" solution)
I agree that the engine CPU distribution will be better than GUI.

However, there might be an economic tradeoff. Say its twice as worse. EC2 cluster running twice as long or with twice as many machines might be a possible alternative. We are not playing a game but analyzing some critical positions. The real question is how much worse is this on average for position analysis? If its 2-3 times worse, it might still well be cheaper to use a standard cluster.

Kurt Utzinger
Posts: 169
Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 8:31 pm
Location: Switzerland
Contact:

Re: Your opinions about the Rybka Cluster Rental

Post by Kurt Utzinger » Sat Jan 01, 2011 12:03 pm

A good thing but in my opinion much to expensive and therefore only interesting for people who do not care about money.
Kurt

Post Reply