At least thats what it says
http://www.loopchess.com/
Best
Fonzy
free loop 2007
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 2803
- Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 3:53 pm
- Location: Denmark
- Full name: Damir Desevac
Re: free loop 2007
is also 32 bits, at least what it says...., so am not interested....
have kicked all my 32 bits engines from my machine.
have kicked all my 32 bits engines from my machine.
-
- Posts: 660
- Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 5:13 am
- Location: Colorado, USA
Re: free loop 2007
Including HIARCS? Mean .Damir wrote:is also 32 bits, at least what it says...., so am not interested....
have kicked all my 32 bits engines from my machine.
Peter
-
- Posts: 582
- Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 7:28 pm
- Location: Birmingham, England
Re: free loop 2007
On the new Loop website it says:
On the question of HIARCS... There was a 64-bit version (X54), but for some reason it's no longer available. That it's supposedly no stronger than the (then) 32-bit HIARCS isn't a good enough reason.
It just seems wrong to run 32-bit engines on 64-bit systems (whatever the real speedup in each case) so I certainly side with Damir.
Does that really mean that no multi-processor version at all is planned?Eine 32-Bit Engine oder eine Multicore Version sind derzeit nicht geplant.
On the question of HIARCS... There was a 64-bit version (X54), but for some reason it's no longer available. That it's supposedly no stronger than the (then) 32-bit HIARCS isn't a good enough reason.
It just seems wrong to run 32-bit engines on 64-bit systems (whatever the real speedup in each case) so I certainly side with Damir.
Marek Soszynski
-
- Posts: 660
- Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 5:13 am
- Location: Colorado, USA
Re: free loop 2007
If it's slower than the 32-bit version (which may have been the case) is that a good enough reason?Marek Soszynski wrote:On the new Loop website it says:
Does that really mean that no multi-processor version at all is planned?Eine 32-Bit Engine oder eine Multicore Version sind derzeit nicht geplant.
On the question of HIARCS... There was a 64-bit version (X54), but for some reason it's no longer available. That it's supposedly no stronger than the (then) 32-bit HIARCS isn't a good enough reason.
It just seems wrong to run 32-bit engines on 64-bit systems (whatever the real speedup in each case) so I certainly side with Damir.
You must not play Fritz or HIARCS or Shredder much..... (though actually Shredder does have a 64-bit version, it's just not much stronger, if at all). Or Bright, or Critter, or a lot of other engines that don't have 64-bit versions.
How good is Loop 2007, anyway??
Peter
-
- Posts: 582
- Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 7:28 pm
- Location: Birmingham, England
Re: free loop 2007
You're right, Peter. I don't use 32-bit engines much on my 64-bit systems.Peter C wrote:You must not play Fritz or HIARCS or Shredder much..... (though actually Shredder does have a 64-bit version, it's just not much stronger, if at all). Or Bright, or Critter, or a lot of other engines that don't have 64-bit versions.
Marek Soszynski
-
- Posts: 10121
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:57 am
- Location: van buren,missouri
Re: free loop 2007
Hi Peter.alpha123 wrote:If it's slower than the 32-bit version (which may have been the case) is that a good enough reason?Marek Soszynski wrote:On the new Loop website it says:
Does that really mean that no multi-processor version at all is planned?Eine 32-Bit Engine oder eine Multicore Version sind derzeit nicht geplant.
On the question of HIARCS... There was a 64-bit version (X54), but for some reason it's no longer available. That it's supposedly no stronger than the (then) 32-bit HIARCS isn't a good enough reason.
It just seems wrong to run 32-bit engines on 64-bit systems (whatever the real speedup in each case) so I certainly side with Damir.
You must not play Fritz or HIARCS or Shredder much..... (though actually Shredder does have a 64-bit version, it's just not much stronger, if at all). Or Bright, or Critter, or a lot of other engines that don't have 64-bit versions.
How good is Loop 2007, anyway??
Peter
Loop is a very nice engine. I don't remember what it is
rated at.
The older versions was one of the first engines
i played.
Best,
Gerold.
-
- Posts: 2872
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:09 pm
- Location: Germany
- Full name: Werner Schüle
Re: free loop 2007
Here are some results from our Blitz-List to show where your can await this engine:
235 Doch 1.2 w32 1CPU 2832
236 Loop 13.6 w32 1CPU 2832
237 Fruit 2.4 Beta B w32 1CPU 2831
238 Critter 0.52b w32 2831 16 16 1100
235 Doch 1.2 w32 1CPU 2832
236 Loop 13.6 w32 1CPU 2832
237 Fruit 2.4 Beta B w32 1CPU 2831
238 Critter 0.52b w32 2831 16 16 1100
Werner
-
- Posts: 812
- Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2009 10:09 am
- Location: Spain
Re: free loop 2007
Hi Gerold,gerold wrote: Hi Peter.
Loop is a very nice engine. I don't remember what it is
rated at.
here are our results in 40/40 (2882): http://computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/4040.l ... 3_6_32-bit
Gerhard comfirmed that Loop 2007 is Loop 13.6 32-bit.
Regards.
-
- Posts: 660
- Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 5:13 am
- Location: Colorado, USA
Re: free loop 2007
Thanks Gerold, Werner, and Aser.
2830ish - Near Secret Fruit and Doch.
Thanks,
Peter
2830ish - Near Secret Fruit and Doch.
Thanks,
Peter