Deep Sjeng has an advantage against Crafty and is already a full point ahead of the rest. A draw or win is clear first, whereas even a miracle draw ties for first place.
Very nice!
Looks like Deep Sjeng wins cct12
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 1280
- Joined: Tue Aug 18, 2009 3:06 am
Re: Looks like Deep Sjeng wins cct12
[Event "ICS Game"]
[Site "ICS"]
[Date "2010.02.21"]
[Round "?"]
[White "SjengX"]
[Black "crafty"]
[WhiteElo "2603P"]
[BlackElo "2399E"]
[Result "*"]
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O b5 6. Bb3
Bb7 7. d3 Be7 8. c3 O-O 9. Re1 h6 10. a4 b4 11. Nbd2 d5
12. exd5 Nxd5 13. Ne4 Kh8 14. d4 exd4 15. cxd4 Nf6 16. Ng3
Bd6 17. Ne5 Bxe5 18. dxe5 Qxd1 19. Bxd1 Nd5 20. Bd2 Rad8
21. Rc1 Nd4 22. a5 Ne6 23. Be2 Rfe8 24. Bc4 Ndf4 25. Bxf4
Nxf4 26. Bxf7 Nxg2 27. Bxe8 Nxe1 28. Rxe1 Rxe8 29. f4 c5
30. Nf5 Bd5 31. Nd6 Re7 32. Kf2 Bb3 33. Ke3 Rc7 34. Ne4 c4
35. Kd4 Bc2 36. e6 c3 37. bxc3 Re7 38. Kd5 b3 39. Kd6 Re8 *
Its safe to say, Sjeng wins the tourney.
[Site "ICS"]
[Date "2010.02.21"]
[Round "?"]
[White "SjengX"]
[Black "crafty"]
[WhiteElo "2603P"]
[BlackElo "2399E"]
[Result "*"]
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O b5 6. Bb3
Bb7 7. d3 Be7 8. c3 O-O 9. Re1 h6 10. a4 b4 11. Nbd2 d5
12. exd5 Nxd5 13. Ne4 Kh8 14. d4 exd4 15. cxd4 Nf6 16. Ng3
Bd6 17. Ne5 Bxe5 18. dxe5 Qxd1 19. Bxd1 Nd5 20. Bd2 Rad8
21. Rc1 Nd4 22. a5 Ne6 23. Be2 Rfe8 24. Bc4 Ndf4 25. Bxf4
Nxf4 26. Bxf7 Nxg2 27. Bxe8 Nxe1 28. Rxe1 Rxe8 29. f4 c5
30. Nf5 Bd5 31. Nd6 Re7 32. Kf2 Bb3 33. Ke3 Rc7 34. Ne4 c4
35. Kd4 Bc2 36. e6 c3 37. bxc3 Re7 38. Kd5 b3 39. Kd6 Re8 *
Its safe to say, Sjeng wins the tourney.
-
- Posts: 2801
- Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 3:53 pm
- Location: Denmark
- Full name: Damir Desevac
Re: Looks like Deep Sjeng wins cct12
You forgot to mention it is using 128 cores cluster. On the other hand, It would be a complete failure, if it did not win the tournament...
-
- Posts: 1280
- Joined: Tue Aug 18, 2009 3:06 am
Re: Looks like Deep Sjeng wins cct12
[Event "ICS Game"]
[Site "ICS"]
[Date "2010.02.21"]
[Round "?"]
[White "SjengX"]
[Black "crafty"]
[WhiteElo "2603P"]
[BlackElo "2399E"]
[Result "*"]
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O b5 6. Bb3
Bb7 7. d3 Be7 8. c3 O-O 9. Re1 h6 10. a4 b4 11. Nbd2 d5
12. exd5 Nxd5 13. Ne4 Kh8 14. d4 exd4 15. cxd4 Nf6 16. Ng3
Bd6 17. Ne5 Bxe5 18. dxe5 Qxd1 19. Bxd1 Nd5 20. Bd2 Rad8
21. Rc1 Nd4 22. a5 Ne6 23. Be2 Rfe8 24. Bc4 Ndf4 25. Bxf4
Nxf4 26. Bxf7 Nxg2 27. Bxe8 Nxe1 28. Rxe1 Rxe8 29. f4 c5
30. Nf5 Bd5 31. Nd6 Re7 32. Kf2 Bb3 33. Ke3 Rc7 34. Ne4 c4
35. Kd4 Bc2 36. e6 c3 37. bxc3 Re7 38. Kd5 b3 39. Kd6 Re8
40. e7 b2 41. Nc5 b1=Q 42. Rxb1 Bxb1 43. Nxa6 Bg6 44. Nc7
Rb8 45. f5 Bf7 46. a6 Rb1 47. a7 Rd1+ 48. Kc6 *
Beautiful endgame!
[Site "ICS"]
[Date "2010.02.21"]
[Round "?"]
[White "SjengX"]
[Black "crafty"]
[WhiteElo "2603P"]
[BlackElo "2399E"]
[Result "*"]
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O b5 6. Bb3
Bb7 7. d3 Be7 8. c3 O-O 9. Re1 h6 10. a4 b4 11. Nbd2 d5
12. exd5 Nxd5 13. Ne4 Kh8 14. d4 exd4 15. cxd4 Nf6 16. Ng3
Bd6 17. Ne5 Bxe5 18. dxe5 Qxd1 19. Bxd1 Nd5 20. Bd2 Rad8
21. Rc1 Nd4 22. a5 Ne6 23. Be2 Rfe8 24. Bc4 Ndf4 25. Bxf4
Nxf4 26. Bxf7 Nxg2 27. Bxe8 Nxe1 28. Rxe1 Rxe8 29. f4 c5
30. Nf5 Bd5 31. Nd6 Re7 32. Kf2 Bb3 33. Ke3 Rc7 34. Ne4 c4
35. Kd4 Bc2 36. e6 c3 37. bxc3 Re7 38. Kd5 b3 39. Kd6 Re8
40. e7 b2 41. Nc5 b1=Q 42. Rxb1 Bxb1 43. Nxa6 Bg6 44. Nc7
Rb8 45. f5 Bf7 46. a6 Rb1 47. a7 Rd1+ 48. Kc6 *
Beautiful endgame!
-
- Posts: 1280
- Joined: Tue Aug 18, 2009 3:06 am
Re: Looks like Deep Sjeng wins cct12
Well the way I look at it, it's simple. The tournement allows for ANY hardware, so if the others cannot use a cluster, then that is their problem. Of course hardware gives an advantage, but remember ANY were allowed to use this hardware. If they could not use this hardware due to the software not supporting it, or they did not have access to a cluster, to bad. GCP's Deep Sjeng could, bully for him. I recall the previous tournements when Ryba also used a cluster, none complained then. Also, even many years prior when Junior, Fritz , and Shredder were all MP engines, and many others were not , this was the same issue. Hardware changes, so gets with the times, or be crushed.Damir wrote:You forgot to mention it is using 128 cores cluster. On the other hand, It would be a complete failure, if it did not win the tournament...
Last edited by Robert Flesher on Sun Feb 21, 2010 2:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 6640
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 4:21 am
Re: Looks like Deep Sjeng wins cct12
Yes, Deep Sjeng won. Congrats, Gian Carlo!
It was tough playing Sjeng. But Spark managed to draw the games against Hiarcs and Shredder.
Spark was winning against Shredder though but it underestimated the power of pawn nail (on h3). Shredder exploited that weakness and took hold of chances for perpetual checks.
It was tough playing Sjeng. But Spark managed to draw the games against Hiarcs and Shredder.
Spark was winning against Shredder though but it underestimated the power of pawn nail (on h3). Shredder exploited that weakness and took hold of chances for perpetual checks.
-
- Posts: 1797
- Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 10:24 pm
Re: Looks like Deep Sjeng wins cct12
Yes, good point.Robert Flesher wrote:Well the way I look at it, it's simple. The tournement allows for ANY hardware, so if the others cannot use a cluster, then that is their problem.Damir wrote:You forgot to mention it is using 128 cores cluster. On the other hand, It would be a complete failure, if it did not win the tournament...
Congratulations to Deep Sjeng!!
Also well done to HIARCS...don't let superstition put you off releasing the next version!
-
- Posts: 1280
- Joined: Tue Aug 18, 2009 3:06 am
Re: Looks like Deep Sjeng wins cct12
Robert Flesher wrote:Deep Sjeng has an advantage against Crafty and is already a full point ahead of the rest. A draw or win is clear first, whereas even a miracle loss ties for first place.
Miracle loss is what I meant.
Very nice!
-
- Posts: 6808
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:16 pm
- Location: Gutweiler, Germany
- Full name: Frank Quisinsky
Re: Thanks to Peter Skinner and the participant programmers!
Hi there,
a nice tournament.
Congratulations to all participant programmers for such a great tournament.
The winner is Gian-Carlo on a special hardware. I like this situation, regards to Gian-Carlo and my special congrats to Gian-Carlo.
To Mark Uniacke too ...
On a "normaly" hardware a second place.
I am sure, we all are very hungrey of a new Hiarcs version. Same for Gian-Carlo ... we await it
Thanks to Peter Skinner for his efforts around the tournament.
Realy a good work.
Best for all
Frank
a nice tournament.
Congratulations to all participant programmers for such a great tournament.
The winner is Gian-Carlo on a special hardware. I like this situation, regards to Gian-Carlo and my special congrats to Gian-Carlo.
To Mark Uniacke too ...
On a "normaly" hardware a second place.
I am sure, we all are very hungrey of a new Hiarcs version. Same for Gian-Carlo ... we await it
Thanks to Peter Skinner for his efforts around the tournament.
Realy a good work.
Best for all
Frank
-
- Posts: 3019
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 9:57 pm
- Location: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Re: Looks like Deep Sjeng wins cct12
Considering that huge clusters have more often not won, than won, it is a very nice victory. A hearty congrats to Gian-Carlo, and to Peter Skinner for a great tourney once again!Damir wrote:You forgot to mention it is using 128 cores cluster. On the other hand, It would be a complete failure, if it did not win the tournament...
"Tactics are the bricks and sticks that make up a game, but positional play is the architectural blueprint."