meschle wrote:
Maybe we should have a referendum on whether robbo/ippo etc.. links should be allowed in the forum - same voting restrictions as the moderation election.
My fellow mods are quite happy allowing links, so unless they have a change of heart, they'll remain.
Cheers,
Graham.
Until Vasik mans up and prove his source code to be stolen,which I strongly doubt,there is no need to delete links....so your fellow moderators are doing just fine
Dr.D
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….
meschle wrote:
Maybe we should have a referendum on whether robbo/ippo etc.. links should be allowed in the forum - same voting restrictions as the moderation election.
My fellow mods are quite happy allowing links, so unless they have a change of heart, they'll remain.
Cheers,
Graham.
Quite right. Ignore the Charter, it is a waste of time.
meschle wrote:
Maybe we should have a referendum on whether robbo/ippo etc.. links should be allowed in the forum - same voting restrictions as the moderation election.
My fellow mods are quite happy allowing links, so unless they have a change of heart, they'll remain.
Cheers,
Graham.
Until Vasik mans up and prove his source code to be stolen,which I strongly doubt,there is no need to delete links....so your fellow moderators are doing just fine
Dr.D
Christopher Conkie wrote:5. Are not of questionable legal status.
Christopher, you know I love you.
Now that we have that settled, I have to disagree with your interpretation. I believe that Point 5 refers to the legal status of the post, not the legality of the subject of the post.
Once a member gains access to the message board, he may read all messages and post new or response messages with the proviso that these new or response messages:
1. Are, within reason, on the topic of computer chess
2. Are not abusive in nature
3. Do not contain personal and/or libelous attacks on others
4. Are not flagrant commercial exhortations
5. Are not of questionable legal status.
There's a fine line between a post and a signature.
Christopher Conkie wrote:5. Are not of questionable legal status.
Christopher, you know I love you.
Now that we have that settled, I have to disagree with your interpretation. I believe that Point 5 refers to the legal status of the post, not the legality of the subject of the post.
Once a member gains access to the message board, he may read all messages and post new or response messages with the proviso that these new or response messages:
1. Are, within reason, on the topic of computer chess
2. Are not abusive in nature
3. Do not contain personal and/or libelous attacks on others
4. Are not flagrant commercial exhortations
5. Are not of questionable legal status.
What would constitute a post with illegal status?
We could have a mighty fine time with this you know Mark.
I can feel a looooonnngg looooooonnnng thread coming on.......
meschle wrote:
Maybe we should have a referendum on whether robbo/ippo etc.. links should be allowed in the forum - same voting restrictions as the moderation election.
My fellow mods are quite happy allowing links, so unless they have a change of heart, they'll remain.