Deep Sjeng @ 29th Dutch Open

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw

Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Posts: 1243
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 7:00 pm

Deep Sjeng @ 29th Dutch Open

Post by Gian-Carlo Pascutto »

(also posted in Rybka forum)

Hi all,

a little retrospective on the Dutch Open from our side!

The Deep Sjeng team was:

Gian-Carlo Pascutto (programmer)
Erdogan Gunes (book)
Jens Heerklotz (engine test)
Sujay Jagannathan (hw test)
Bert Leznir (book test)

After the ACCA tournament I worked for a while to fix some longstanding issues in the engine (for example to prevent the disaster we had in the last round there!) and try to tweak the single-core performance a little. I got some nice improvement but was also a bit too stubborn trying to get some things to work. Given that the Dutch Open was an unlimited tournament, and Suj has been extending his hardware store, I wanted to rework the clustering algorithm extensively to scale better over a large number of clients. Eventually it was a scramble to get the revised clustering ready in time, with some unexpected issues propping up in what is easily the most complex code I have ever written.

I wasn't able to deliver a more or less completed new version until less than a week before the tournament, which meant that again it was a total scramble to get everything tested in time. Jens, Suj, Erdo and Bert have been essentially running nonstop tests until the wee hours of morning to get both the book adapted to the new version on such short notice, and to figure out the best cluster setups. Some of you who follow playchess closely might have seen some of that. Eventually I got confirmation that both the engine was a clear single-core improvement and that (with some settings) the clustering code was giving a nice extra speedup, so we could go the tournament in the knowledge that we should be able to put up quite a fight against anyone. However I also know the other programmers have worked hard so that unpleasant surprises can always happen.

The start of the tournament was quite a let-down due to very serious issues with the internet connection, which persisted throughout the entire weekend. We eventually started much later than intended and had to play with reduced time controls to make up for the lost time. Given that I am very much not a morning person and had to get up very early to get to Leiden in time for the announced starting time this wasn't very pleasant. Not to mention - we could not go into the nice city to relax afterward.

We started the first day with a configuration of 3 x 24 core 2.4Ghz AMD machines.

- Joker played the first game without book, made some positional mistakes, and was summarily mopped up. This was not so spectacular but we were happy to confirm that the cluster seemed to be stable and no bugs with mating and hash tables showed up (unlike some other participants).

- I was happy when I saw The King joined, as it has an active-attacking playing style that mixes well with that of Sjeng, meaning games from both programs tend to be huge fights. It did not look like much was going to happen after a passive opening from the King, until it suddenly sacrificed a pawn for pressure against the white King. However, black also got his king stuck in the center and truly massive complications ensued, which even with all 72 cores we could not punch through. At move 22, Sjeng was planning f5 and a double piece sacrifice, thinking this would give white a small advantage, when suddenly the roof fell in and the score dropped by 2 pawns. (Moderators, can someone put a diagram here perhaps?) Even when going into emergency mode (fail low time extension), the complications were too much to see through, Sjeng timed out and played the best move it had so far, which was probably still not very good. The King won a quality and started trading down to a won endgame. Unfortunately for it, it traded down just a bit too eagerly and left a misplaced rook. The cluster locked on to this very quickly and our score jumped above zero again. Deep Sjeng put the rook definitely out of play, activated its king, and won the resulting endgame. Truly one of the most amazing computer chess games I have ever played.

- It was a bit sad that we met Rybka already in round 3, because this was likely to be a decisive game. On the positive side, we had the white colors. We also made some slight changes to the hardware setup and settings from the latest incoming test results, slightly reducing the number of cores to 64, but getting a better overall performance for the reduced time control (75 mins instead of 90). In the game Rybka was in book quite a while longer and seemed to exit in an equal position, where it's a question if black's space grab on the queenside provides sufficient compensation for the uncastled king. After a deep search Rybka found c3! and Sjengs score plummeted the next move. Deep Sjeng tried hard to make something of the black's king position, and scarified a piece to get to it, but in the end white didn't really seem to have something and black won being a piece up. For me at least one positive side of this game was that I had been watching Rybka's scores and they tracked Deep Sjeng's quite closely (as well as the best moves, causing us to lose lots of time when Rybka kept getting ponderhits). This seems to indicate Rybka is no longer greatly outsearching us, which opens some prospects for future face-offs.

For the second day, we again changed the hw setup and the settings based on overnight testing, although I can't remember to what :P

- The game against Hermann was a quite simple victory. White scarified a pawn for better development, but could not understand it's own compensation. This was a bit of a funny situation as Hermann evaluated itself at -0.6 even though Sjeng only though black had a small advantage (-0.15). As a result, white's advantage did evaporate pretty quickly and black easily won being a pawn up.

- In the game against Hansdamf, we got a typical Erdo-Sicilian. Unfortunately at some point white wanted to repeat moves, and Deep Sjeng avoided this with a positionally suspect move (Bxc3), giving up it's Dragon bishop to give white two doubled isolated pawns on an open file. (Diagram?) Although strongly condemned by Erdo and most chess players in the hall, Jeroen seemed to be more cautious as blacks compensation is indeed non-negligible. In fact Hansdamf almost instantly proceeded in the wrong way and could not defend all of it's weak pawns. Deep Sjeng snatched a few off and traded down into and endgame 2 pawns up.

We had a bye in the next round so there was some time for a walk in the city. I had not eaten anything during the second day as the games were ongoing, but this was easily fixed in the Greek restaurant Delphi in the center of Leiden, where for the first time since 3 attempts in the last years I was able to finish one of their huge and very tasty meat platters. Jummy!

In day 3, we again had a change of hw and settings, this time moving to 96 cores with fairly conservative parameters.

- In the first game against Pandix, I was somewhat concerned as Pandix was a bit of an unknown factor, but I heard several times the engine has improved tremendously, so this might well have been a very strong remaining opponent. We played a deep Spanish line, where my opponent remarked several times he prepared this opening quite deeply. Deep Sjeng was out of book first, that is to say, we still had bookmoves but Erdo had set it so the engine had to find them itself. This resulted in a lot of gloating from our opponent over his superior preparation. After his last bookmove our initial score was about -0.5 and we were already in a bit of a panic. However, during the search the cluster took a very long time over a move that left our rook hanging. After a while the score for it returned and we went from -0.5 to +1 for N3h4. After another minute the score for Nxh6 returned: +4.5. (Diagram?) The game was over at that point although our opponent played on for a while (his engine was still a piece up, after all :-)). Afterward the opponent remarked how lucky we had been, to which I replied I was happy to play him again, and again, and again :-) :-) ...

- The next round against Ktulu was also a quite crazy game. Our opponent was out of book quickly but found all the bookmoves for a long while. After a bit of wiggling in a balanced position Sjeng saw a way to find the advantage, but several moves into the maneuvering we suddenly had a big fail low on Qc1. Unfortunately the opponent also saw this trick and a few moves later our position was busted. Deep Sjeng thought the position was defensible (+0.2 for white) but we didn't really agree. It defended as accurately as possible, and after the opponent missed a chance to finish us off, he pushed too hard for a win, allowing us to get a single passer that outran his two connected ones (the Ktulu operator saw this problem several moves before the engine did). For the second time this tournament we ended up in a losing position, but accurate defense against opponents too eager to win allow us to turn the tables on them. I analyzed this game a bit afterward as I was not happy with the cluster missing white's trick, but Rybka 3 also did not seem to see it sufficiently ahead of time on my laptop, so I've decided not to worry about it too much. We also reached our peak NPS in this game: 110mnps, just 10mnps shy of Deep Blue's speed.

- The last game against The Baron should have been quite interesting, as The Baron has snatched away many half points from us in the past, and did in fact do so again against Rybka. The very solid search combined with a solid evaluation and a solid book ... make for a solid opponent! However the game was somewhat of a letdown. After the opening white had more space, better development and a simple and straightforward winning plan. Deep Sjeng makes no mistakes in such positions and The Baron lost without being able to put up a fight. Nevertheless a good tournament for Richard who won his first trophy.

Although we again were half a point short of stopping Rybka's winning streak, we're nevertheless very happy with our performance and look forward to the next tournament, where we will again go on a fishing expedition. There will probably be no opportunity to make sushi in Japan, but I've heard Hollandaise sauce goes pretty well with fish platters.
User avatar
Thomas Lagershausen
Posts: 328
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 6:59 pm

Re: Deep Sjeng @ 29th Dutch Open

Post by Thomas Lagershausen »

Thx for sharing your impressions of the games with us. :D

This games are really exiting.

Did you remember the winning move for white in the game Ktulu-DeepSjeng ?

Thx in advance.
TL
User avatar
mclane
Posts: 18748
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 6:40 pm
Location: US of Europe, germany
Full name: Thorsten Czub

Re: Deep Sjeng @ 29th Dutch Open

Post by mclane »

- In the first game against Pandix, I was somewhat concerned as Pandix was a bit of an unknown factor, but I heard several times the engine has improved tremendously, so this might well have been a very strong remaining opponent. We played a deep Spanish line, where my opponent remarked several times he prepared this opening quite deeply. Deep Sjeng was out of book first, that is to say, we still had bookmoves but Erdo had set it so the engine had to find them itself. This resulted in a lot of gloating from our opponent over his superior preparation. After his last bookmove our initial score was about -0.5 and we were already in a bit of a panic. However, during the search the cluster took a very long time over a move that left our rook hanging. After a while the score for it returned and we went from -0.5 to +1 for N3h4. After another minute the score for Nxh6 returned: +4.5. (Diagram?) The game was over at that point although our opponent played on for a while (his engine was still a piece up, after all ). Afterward the opponent remarked how lucky we had been, to which I replied I was happy to play him again, and again, and again ...
thats always very sad when opening books give away whole games. maybe if pandix would not have been forced to play this line,
it would have defended better...
can you give us the PGN ?
What seems like a fairy tale today may be reality tomorrow.
Here we have a fairy tale of the day after tomorrow....
User avatar
George Tsavdaris
Posts: 1627
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:35 pm

Re: Deep Sjeng @ 29th Dutch Open

Post by George Tsavdaris »

mclane wrote: thats always very sad when opening books give away whole games. maybe if pandix would not have been forced to play this line,
it would have defended better...
can you give us the PGN ?
[Event "29th Dutch Open CCC"]
[Site "Leiden"]
[Date "2009.10.18"]
[Round "7"]
[White "Deep Sjeng"]
[Black "Pandix 2009 AI"]
[Result "1-0"]
[BlackElo "2200"]
[ECO "C92"]
[Opening "Spanish"]
[Time "09:51:32"]
[Variation "Closed, Zaitsev, 12.a4 h6 13.Bc2 exd4 14.cxd4 Nb4 15.Bb1 c5"]
[WhiteElo "2400"]
[TimeControl "4560"]
[Termination "normal"]
[PlyCount "64"]
[WhiteType "human"]
[BlackType "program"]

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Be7 6. Re1 b5 7. Bb3 O-O 8.
c3 d6 9. h3 Bb7 10. d4 Re8 11. Nbd2 Bf8 12. a4 h6 13. Bc2 exd4 14. cxd4 Nb4
15. Bb1 c5 16. d5 Nd7 17. Ra3 c4 18. Ree3 Rc8 19. axb5 axb5 20. Nd4 Qb6 21.
N2f3 Na6 22. Nf5 b4 23. Nxh6+ gxh6 {(g7xh6 Nf3h4 Nd7f6 Re3g3+ Kg8h8 Ra3f3
Qb6d8 Nh4f5 Nf6h5 Bc1xh6 Rc8c7 Bh6xf8 Re8xf8 Qd1d4+ f7f6 Rg3g6 Rf8f7 Nf5h6)
+0.29/16 193} 24. Nh4 Nf6 {(Nd7f6 Re3g3+ Kg8h8 Ra3f3 Qb6d8 Nh4f5 Nf6h5
Bc1xh6 Rc8c7 Qd1d4+ Re8e5 Rg3g5 Nh5f6 Bh6xf8 Qd8xf8 Nf5xd6 Re5xg5 Nd6xb7)
+0.29/15 74} 25. Rg3+ Kh8 {(Kg8h8 Ra3f3 Qb6d8 Nh4f5 Rc8c7 Nf5xh6 Bf8xh6
Bc1xh6 Nf6h5 Bh6g5 f7f6 Rf3xf6 Rc7h7 Rf6e6 Qd8b8 Qd1d4+ Nh5g7 Re6xe8+
Qb8xe8) +0.29/15 0} 26. Raf3 Qd8 {(Qb6d8 Nh4f5 Re8e5 Nf5xh6 Rc8c7 Rf3xf6
Qd8xf6 Rg3g8+ Kh8h7 Rg8xf8 Bb7c8 Nh6f5 Re5xf5 e4xf5 Kh7g7 Rf8e8 Bc8xf5)
+0.29/15 0} 27. Ng6+ fxg6 {(f7xg6 Rg3xg6 Nf6h7 Rf3g3 Bf8g7 Rg6xg7 Rc8c7
Bc1xh6 Nh7f6 Qd1d4 Re8e5 f2f4 Nf6d7 f4xe5) -8.58/17 334} 28. Rxg6 Rc7
{(Rc8c7 Rf3xf6 Bf8g7 Rf6xd6 Qd8e7 Bc1xh6 Bg7xb2 Bh6g5 Qe7h7 Rg6h6 Bb2e5
Rh6xh7+ Rc7xh7 Rd6g6 b4b3) -10.48/16 664} 29. Rfxf6 Bg7 {(Bf8g7 Rf6xd6
Qd8e7 Bc1xh6 Bg7xb2 Bh6g5 Qe7h7 Rg6h6 Kh8g8 Rh6xh7 Rc7xh7 Rd6g6+ Kg8h8
Qd1e2 Bb2e5 Qe2xc4 Re8c8) -12.94/16 259} 30. Rxd6 Qe7 {(Qd8e7 Bc1xh6 Bg7xb2
Bh6g5 Qe7xd6 Rg6xd6 Kh8g8 Rd6g6+ Rc7g7 Rg6xg7+ Bb2xg7 d5d6 Na6c5 d6d7
Nc5xd7 Qd1xd7 Re8e5 Qd7xb7 Re5xg5 Qb7c8+) -12.94/16 0} 31. Rxh6+ Bxh6
{(Bg7xh6 Rd6xh6+ Kh8g8 Rh6g6+ Qe7g7 Rg6xg7+ Rc7xg7 Bc1h6 Bb7c8 Bh6xg7
Kg8xg7 d5d6 Bc8e6 Qd1h5 Be6d7 e4e5 Na6b8 Qh5h7+ Kg7f8 Qh7h6+) -19.43/15
157} 32. Rxh6+ Kg8 {(Kh8g8 Qd1g4+ Qe7g7 Rh6g6 Bb7c8 Qg4h5 Re8f8 Bc1h6
Bc8xh3 Rg6xg7+ Rc7xg7 Bh6xg7 Kg8xg7 Qh5xh3 Na6c5 Qh3g4+ Kg7h8 e4e5 Nc5d3
e5e6) -22.19/15 271 Black resigns} 1-0
After his son's birth they've asked him:
"Is it a boy or girl?"
YES! He replied.....
F. Bluemers
Posts: 868
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 11:21 pm
Location: Nederland

Games 29th Dutch Open

Post by F. Bluemers »

User avatar
Thomas Lagershausen
Posts: 328
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 6:59 pm

Re: Deep Sjeng @ 29th Dutch Open

Post by Thomas Lagershausen »

Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:(also posted in Rybka forum)

At move 22, Sjeng was planning f5 and a double piece sacrifice, thinking this would give white a small advantage, when suddenly the roof fell in and the score dropped by 2 pawns. (Moderators, can someone put a diagram here perhaps?) Even when going into emergency mode (fail low time extension), the complications were too much to see through, Sjeng timed out and played the best move it had so far, which was probably still not very good. The King won a quality and started trading down to a won endgame.
[D]4rk1r/pb1n1p2/1p1bp1p1/3n2N1/5P1P/3q1B2/PP1BNRP1/R2Q2K1 w - -

22.f5?! with the line gxf5 23.Nxe6+? fxe6 24.Bh6+ Rxh6 25.Dxd3 win the queen for white, but left black with a winning position.
TL
Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Posts: 1243
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 7:00 pm

Re: Deep Sjeng @ 29th Dutch Open

Post by Gian-Carlo Pascutto »

Thomas Lagershausen wrote:Thx for sharing your impressions of the games with us. :D

This games are really exiting.

Did you remember the winning move for white in the game Ktulu-DeepSjeng ?

Thx in advance.
Qh5 instead of Qh7 iirc.
User avatar
fern
Posts: 8755
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 4:07 pm

Re: Deep Sjeng @ 29th Dutch Open

Post by fern »

Very interesting. Do will we have a simple core version of the program in future?

Fern
User avatar
Thomas Lagershausen
Posts: 328
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 6:59 pm

Re: Deep Sjeng @ 29th Dutch Open

Post by Thomas Lagershausen »

Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:
Thomas Lagershausen wrote:Thx for sharing your impressions of the games with us. :D

This games are really exiting.

Did you remember the winning move for white in the game Ktulu-DeepSjeng ?

Thx in advance.
Qh5 instead of Qh7 iirc.
Thx for your information.

Perhaps 42.g5 is stronger as Qh5.

[D]2qkrb2/3b4/p3p1Q1/1p1pB3/3N2P1/P1PB4/2P4P/7K w - - 5 42

Naum 4 (2core):
1/9 00:00 282 282.000 +0,22 Dg6g5+
2/9 00:00 615 615.000 +0,29 Dg6f6+ Lf8e7
3/10 00:00 1.088 1.088.000 +0,25 Dg6g5+ Lf8e7
4/17 00:00 2.671 2.671.000 0,00 Dg6g5+ Lf8e7 Dg5g6 Dc8c5
5/6 00:00 2.749 2.749.000 0,00 Dg6g5+ Lf8e7 Dg5g6 Dc8c5 Sd4xe6+
6/9 00:00 5.484 342.750 0,00 Dg6g5+ Lf8e7 Dg5g6 Dc8c5 Sd4xe6+ Ld7xe6
7/8 00:00 7.963 497.687 0,00 Dg6g5+ Lf8e7 Dg5g6 Dc8c5 Sd4xe6+ Ld7xe6 Dg6xe6
8/13 00:00 12.743 411.064 0,00 Dg6g5+ Lf8e7 Dg5g6 Dc8c5 Sd4xe6+ Ld7xe6 Dg6xe6 Le7h4
9/13 00:00 32.836 698.638 0,00 Dg6g5+ Lf8e7 Dg5g6 Dc8c5 Sd4xe6+ Ld7xe6 Dg6xe6 Le7h4 De6f5
10/14 00:00 58.919 935.222 0,00 Dg6g5+ Lf8e7 Dg5g6 Dc8c5 Sd4xe6+ Ld7xe6 Dg6xe6 Le7h4 De6f5 Dc5f8
11/21 00:00 124.061 1.138.174 0,00 Dg6g5+ Lf8e7 Dg5g6 Dc8c5 Sd4xe6+ Ld7xe6 Dg6xe6 Le7h4 De6f5 Dc5f8 Df5xf8
11/29 00:00 439.563 1.564.281 +0,11 Dg6h5 Lf8xa3 g4g5 Dc8c5 g5g6 Dc5e7 g6g7 Te8g8 Dh5h7 De7f7 Kh1g2
12/30 00:00 629.545 1.610.089 0,00 Dg6h5 Lf8xa3 g4g5 Dc8c5 g5g6 Dc5e7 g6g7 Te8g8 Dh5g6 Kd8c8 Sd4f5 De7e8
13/39 00:02 3.706.744 1.868.318 +0,30 Dg6h5 Dc8c5 Ld3g6 Dc5xa3 Kh1g2 Da3c1 Dh5h4+ Lf8e7 Dh4f2 Kd8c8 Lg6xe8 Ld7xe8 Sd4xe6
14/42 00:04 7.977.397 1.919.489 +0,39 Dg6h5 Dc8c5 Ld3g6 Dc5xa3 Kh1g2 Da3c1 Dh5h4+ Lf8e7 Dh4f2 Kd8c8 Sd4c6 Le7g5 Sc6b8 Dc1e3
15/43 00:07 14.959.912 1.978.039 +0,47 Dg6h5 Dc8c5 Ld3g6 Dc5xa3 Kh1g2 Da3c1 Dh5h4+ Lf8e7 Dh4f2 Kd8c8 Sd4c6 Le7g5 Sc6b8 Dc1d2 Df2xd2
16/54 00:16 32.801.072 2.026.258 +0,35 Dg6h5 Dc8c5 Ld3g6 Dc5xa3 Kh1g2 Da3c1 Dh5h4+ Kd8c8 Lg6xe8 Ld7xe8 Dh4f6 Dc1h6 Df6xe6+ Dh6xe6 Sd4xe6 Lf8e7
17/46 00:26 55.442.434 2.062.974 +0,35 Dg6h5 Dc8c5 Ld3g6 Dc5xa3 Kh1g2 Da3c1 Dh5h4+ Kd8c8 Lg6xe8 Ld7xe8 Dh4f6 Dc1h6 Df6xe6+ Dh6xe6 Sd4xe6 Lf8e7 Se6c7
18/56 01:13 154.686.290 2.116.728 +0,32 Dg6h5 Dc8c5 Ld3g6 Dc5xa3 Kh1g2 Da3c1 Dh5h4+ Kd8c8 Lg6xe8 Ld7xe8 Dh4f6 Dc1h6 Df6xe6+ Dh6xe6 Sd4xe6 Lf8e7 Se6c7 Le7f6
19/55 02:47 358.988.264 2.142.011 +0,29 Dg6h5 Dc8c5 Ld3g6 Dc5xa3 Kh1g2 Da3c1 Dh5h4+ Kd8c8 Lg6xe8 Ld7xe8 Dh4f6 Dc1h6 Df6xe6+ Dh6xe6 Sd4xe6 Lf8e7 Se6c7 Le7f6 Le5xf6
20/57 06:02 782.026.153 2.157.682 +0,30 Dg6h5 Dc8c5 Ld3g6 Dc5xa3 Kh1g2 Da3c1 Dh5h4+ Kd8c8 Lg6xe8 Ld7xe8 Dh4f6 Dc1h6 Df6xe6+ Dh6xe6 Sd4xe6 Lf8e7 Se6c7 Le7f6 Le5xf6 Kc8xc7
21/61 13:44 1.770.563.972 2.148.132 +0,41 Dg6h5 Dc8c5 Ld3g6 Dc5xa3 Kh1g2 Da3c1 Dh5h4+ Kd8c8 Lg6xe8 Ld7xe8 Dh4f2 Lf8e7 Le5f4 Dc1d1 Kg2g3 Kc8b7 Df2e3 e6e5 Lf4xe5 Le7c5 h2h3
22/62 29:54 3.851.127.387 2.146.391 +0,48 Dg6h5 Dc8c5 Ld3g6 Dc5xa3 Kh1g2 Da3c1 Dh5h4+ Kd8c8 Lg6xe8 Ld7xe8 Dh4f2 Lf8e7 Le5f4 Dc1d1 Sd4f3 d5d4 Kg2g3 Le8g6 Sf3xd4 Lg6e4 Sd4xe6 Dd1xc2
23/62 1:14:01 9.541.920.540 2.148.454 +0,30 Dg6h5 Dc8c5 Ld3g6 Dc5xa3 Kh1g2 Da3c1 Dh5h4+ Kd8c8 Lg6xe8 Ld7xe8 Dh4f2 Lf8e7 Le5f4 Dc1d1 Kg2g3 Kc8b7 Df2e3 e6e5 Lf4xe5 Le7c5 h2h3 Le8d7 Le5f6
23/62 2:11:19 16.818.985.775 2.134.639 +0,90 g4g5 Dc8c5 Dg6f6+ Kd8c8 g5g6 Dc5e7 Df6f4 De7xa3 Df4g5 Lf8e7 Dg5g1 Te8g8 g6g7 Le7d6 Le5xd6 Da3xd6 Dg1g5 Dd6c7 Ld3h7 Dc7xc3 Lh7xg8 Dc3xd4 Lg8h7
TL
User avatar
Thomas Lagershausen
Posts: 328
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 6:59 pm

Re: Deep Sjeng @ 29th Dutch Open

Post by Thomas Lagershausen »

Thomas Lagershausen wrote:
Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:(also posted in Rybka forum)

At move 22, Sjeng was planning f5 and a double piece sacrifice, thinking this would give white a small advantage, when suddenly the roof fell in and the score dropped by 2 pawns. (Moderators, can someone put a diagram here perhaps?) Even when going into emergency mode (fail low time extension), the complications were too much to see through, Sjeng timed out and played the best move it had so far, which was probably still not very good. The King won a quality and started trading down to a won endgame.
[D]4rk1r/pb1n1p2/1p1bp1p1/3n2N1/5P1P/3q1B2/PP1BNRP1/R2Q2K1 w - -

22.f5?! with the line gxf5 23.Nxe6+? fxe6 24.Bh6+ Rxh6 25.Dxd3 win the queen for white, but left black with a winning position.
22.h5 !? is suggested by Bright 0.4.

I think a very interesting move !


4rk1r/pb1n1p2/1p1bp1p1/3n2N1/5P1P/3q1B2/PP1BNRP1/R2Q2K1 w - -

Engine: Bright 0.4a (2core-256 MB)
von AJ Siemelink

9/42 0:01 -0.58 22.h5 Lc5 23.Le4 Db5 24.hxg6 f5
25.Sf7 Tg8 26.Lxd5 Lxf2+ 27.Kxf2 Dxd5 (3.384.137) 1

9/42 0:03 -0.47 22.f5 exf5 23.Lc3 Dxd1+ 24.Txd1 Sxc3
25.Sxc3 Lxf3 26.gxf3 Ke7 27.Sxf7 Kxf7
28.Txd6 (5.572.158) 1

10/42 0:06 -0.22 22.f5 Txh4 23.g3 Lxg3 24.Sxe6+ fxe6
25.Lh6+ Txh6 26.Dxd3 Lxf2+ 27.Kxf2 gxf5
28.Da3+ Te7 29.Dxa7 Th2+ 30.Lg2 (11.777.121) 1

11/49 0:08 -0.20 22.f5 Txh4 23.g3 Lxg3 24.Sxe6+ fxe6
25.Sxg3 Se5 26.fxg6 Sf6 27.Lxb7 Dxg3+
28.Tg2 (17.463.205) 2

12/49 0:18 -0.22 22.f5 gxf5 23.Sxe6+ Txe6 24.Lh6+ Texh6
25.Dxd3 Txh4 26.g3 Th1+ 27.Lxh1 Txh1+
28.Kxh1 Sf4+ 29.Df3 Lxf3+ 30.Txf3 Sxe2
31.Kg2 (39.376.883) 2

13/53 0:33 -0.30 22.f5 gxf5 23.Sxe6+ Txe6 24.Lh6+ Texh6
25.Dxd3 Txh4 26.g3 Th1+ 27.Lxh1 Txh1+
28.Kxh1 Sf4+ 29.Df3 Lxf3+ 30.Txf3 Sxe2
31.Kg2 Le5 (74.469.607) 2

14/57 1:25 -0.17 22.f5 gxf5 23.Sxe6+ Txe6 24.Lh6+ Texh6
25.Dxd3 Txh4 26.g3 Th1+ 27.Lxh1 Txh1+
28.Kxh1 Sf4+ 29.Df3 Lxf3+ 30.Txf3 Sxe2
31.Kg2 Sd4 32.Te3 (196.357.889) 2

15/57 3:53 +0.02 22.f5 gxf5 23.Sxe6+ Txe6 24.Lh6+ Texh6
25.Dxd3 Txh4 26.g3 Th1+ 27.Lxh1 Txh1+
28.Kxh1 Sf4+ 29.Df3 Lxf3+ 30.Txf3 Sxe2
31.Td1 Sxg3+ 32.Kg2 Se4 33.Txf5 (534.197.460) 2

16/65 7:24 -0.13 22.f5 exf5 23.Lc3 Dxd1+ 24.Txd1 Sxc3
25.Sxc3 Lc5 26.Lxb7 Se5 27.g3 Sg4
28.Sh3 Sxf2 29.Sxf2 f4 30.gxf4 Txh4
31.Sd5 (1.037.501.844) 2

17/65 19:18 -0.45 22.f5 gxf5 23.Sxe6+ Txe6 24.Lh6+ Texh6
25.Dxd3 Txh4 26.g3 Se5 27.Db3 Tb4
28.Da3 Lc5 29.Tb1 Sxf3+ 30.Dxf3 Sc3
31.Dxb7 Lxf2+ 32.Kxf2 Sxb1 (2.790.069.099) 2

18/69 55:37 -0.45 22.f5 gxf5 23.Sxe6+ Txe6 24.Lh6+ Texh6
25.Dxd3 Txh4 26.g3 Se5 27.Db3 Tb4
28.Da3 Lc5 29.Tb1 Sxf3+ 30.Dxf3 Sc3
31.Dxb7 Lxf2+ 32.Kxf2 Sxb1 (3.888.262.200) 1

19/86 121:48 -0.85 22.f5 gxf5 23.Sxe6+ Txe6 24.Lh6+ Texh6
25.Dxd3 Txh4 26.g3 Se5 27.Db3 Tb4
28.Da3 Lc5 29.Tc1 Sf4 30.Txc5 Sxf3+
31.Txf3 Sxe2+ 32.Kf1 bxc5 33.Kxe2 Lxf3+
34.Kxf3 (932.453.159) 0

19/86 139:43 -0.78 22.Se4 Le7 23.g3 Sc5 24.Sc1 Dc4
25.De2 La6 26.Dxc4 Lxc4 27.b3 La6
28.Kh1 Sxe4 29.Lxe4 Lf6 30.Tb1 Ld4
31.Tg2 Lf1 32.Th2 (3.502.701.867) 0

19/87 302:51 -0.48 22.h5 Lc5 23.Se4 Lxf2+ 24.Sxf2 Db5
25.hxg6 fxg6 26.Lc3 Th6 27.Dd2 Th4
28.Td1 Dc4 29.Dc2 Sxc3 30.Sxc3 Sc5
31.Dxg6 Txf4 32.Dh6+ Ke7 33.Lxb7 Sxb7
34.Dh7+ Tf7 (2.165.579.173) 0
TL