Thx too.
Is there a wb2uci.ini where Thinker is able to analyse?
Thinker MP
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 10:26 am
- Location: France
Re: Thinker MP
Apparently, the smp version can not be installed on a 2 cores machine.
-
- Posts: 388
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:08 pm
Re: Thinker MP
I'm sorry, but at the moment, it is "fixed" at 4 cores/processors.SzG wrote:Hi Lance,
Thank you for the first multicore Thinker. Is there a special command to use it on a 4-core machine if I want to use only 2 cores?
-
- Posts: 4790
- Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 12:42 am
Re: Thinker MP
CThinker wrote:I'm sorry, but at the moment, it is "fixed" at 4 cores/processors.SzG wrote:Hi Lance,
Thank you for the first multicore Thinker. Is there a special command to use it on a 4-core machine if I want to use only 2 cores?
Lance, forget this version for a moment. Since 4.7a, you have not put out a version that shows any output at all during the game or in the PGNs. If you are going to keep doing this, which is really a pain for us testers, would you at least tell me your thinking on this and why you wont show the output?
Best,
George
-
- Posts: 9773
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:44 pm
- Location: Amman,Jordan
Re: Thinker MP
Thanks Lance,but doesn't the 2 cored guys deserve a version working on their machines
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….
-
- Posts: 221
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 4:53 pm
Re: Thinker MP
Im on a Dual core duo i guess for now i just test SP version. George you can use old chessbase adapter to see what thinker thinks after each move. Check our discussion forum under too many thinkers
-
- Posts: 4556
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 4:30 am
Re: Thinker MP
It would be useful if Thinker sent this information before moving.
-
- Posts: 1833
- Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 12:07 am
Re: Thinker MP
Why can't Thinker just work like any other engine so that it display information in a Chessbase GUI or the like?
I mean, almost _every_ engine does this, from the simples to the most advanced.
I can't see a reason why this is disabled in Thinker...
Thinker is probably my favorite engine and it's hard to use it for anything when it doesn't display any information on the screen what so ever.
Please, just please, make Thinker work like the old 4.7a version.
Best Regards,
Martin
I mean, almost _every_ engine does this, from the simples to the most advanced.
I can't see a reason why this is disabled in Thinker...
Thinker is probably my favorite engine and it's hard to use it for anything when it doesn't display any information on the screen what so ever.
Please, just please, make Thinker work like the old 4.7a version.
Best Regards,
Martin
-
- Posts: 388
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:08 pm
Re: Thinker MP
There is very little code that is common between the 4.x and the 5.x versions.geots wrote:CThinker wrote:I'm sorry, but at the moment, it is "fixed" at 4 cores/processors.SzG wrote:Hi Lance,
Thank you for the first multicore Thinker. Is there a special command to use it on a 4-core machine if I want to use only 2 cores?
Lance, forget this version for a moment. Since 4.7a, you have not put out a version that shows any output at all during the game or in the PGNs. If you are going to keep doing this, which is really a pain for us testers, would you at least tell me your thinking on this and why you wont show the output?
Best,
George
The PV output of Thinker is simply from the hash table. There is no giant PV array in Thinker. You can also see this kind of simplicity in enignes like MicroMax.
Cheers...
-
- Posts: 388
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:08 pm
Re: Thinker MP
For simplicity of code, I did not want to have to deal with the complexity of configurable number of threads. This means that if I want to run with some N number of threads, I would have to recompile the code. It would be a little messy to release 8 binaries (like thinker-smp1, thinker-smp2).Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:Thanks Lance,but doesn't the 2 cored guys deserve a version working on their machines
For the moment, please bear with this limitation, until I am able to code the support for configurable number of threads.