Rajlich/Osipov/Rybka/Strelka/Answers by Convekta

[GenoM]

No, it's funny because noone of new-born can not give an answer to the simple question. Why V. Rajlich did not publish sources of Rybka 1.0 if it's Strelka 1.8? To prove his point. I already asked this question (http://www.talkchess.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=18907) but no answer till now. Just what I expected, by the way

[Rolf]

No, it's funny because noone of new-born can not give an answer to the simple question. Why V. Rajlich did not publish sources of Rybka 1.0 if it's Strelka 1.8? To prove his point. I already asked this question (http://www.talkchess.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=18907) but no answer till now. Just what I expected, by the way

Yes but you still run around and repeat the question. Why?

Again, what means new-born?

And why do you think Rajlich didnt give his source code? Please tell me.