Junior in Elista

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw

Patatov

Junior in Elista

Post by Patatov »

According some screenshots on Chessbase web site it seems that Junior was running the 9.1 version against Deep Fritz in Elista... Was 10.1 not good enough?
Vinvin
Posts: 5228
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 9:40 am
Full name: Vincent Lejeune

Re: Junior in Elista

Post by Vinvin »

Yes, I remarked the same thing. It's very strange ...
Uri Blass
Posts: 10300
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:37 am
Location: Tel-Aviv Israel

Re: Junior in Elista

Post by Uri Blass »

Patatov wrote:According some screenshots on Chessbase web site it seems that Junior was running the 9.1 version against Deep Fritz in Elista... Was 10.1 not good enough?
The screenshot only showed the interface that was used and not the engine that was used.

Junior was used under chessbase interface and the programmers probably used Junior9 interface.

Uri
cooldalek

Re: Junior in Elista

Post by cooldalek »

No Uri, that's not correct

The screenshots show the engine pane and the actual engine that was used was 9
User avatar
pedrox
Posts: 1056
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 6:07 am
Location: Basque Country (Spain)

Re: Junior in Elista

Post by pedrox »

yes,

"deep junior 9.1" and "fritz elista"
Terry McCracken

Re: Junior in Elista

Post by Terry McCracken »

pedrox wrote:yes,

"deep junior 9.1" and "fritz elista"
That's very odd?

Terry
Uri Blass
Posts: 10300
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:37 am
Location: Tel-Aviv Israel

Re: Junior in Elista

Post by Uri Blass »

cooldalek wrote:No Uri, that's not correct

The screenshots show the engine pane and the actual engine that was used was 9
No

The screenshot does not show the engine.

I tested in the past after junior4.6 different versions of Junior4.x and the screen showed the same name even when the engine was different.

The engine was some dll file that I got by email.

Uri
cooldalek

Re: Junior in Elista

Post by cooldalek »

perhaps we are looking at different bits of the screen.

Anyway, I can't say I'm really bothered whether they used Junior 9, 10 or 11
Patatov

Re: Junior in Elista

Post by Patatov »

Well... As Junior was running on a 16 CPU, the laptop was just a remote terminal... That could explain the 9.1 version.
Patatov

Re: Junior in Elista

Post by Patatov »

Just checked again and they were using terminal services so the remote server was definitively 9.1... Very odd