A historical game

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderator: Ras

Lyudmil Tsvetkov
Posts: 6052
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 12:41 pm

Re: A historical game

Post by Lyudmil Tsvetkov »

yanquis1972 wrote:i think its a very valid point, as i find the pv line is not worth a great deal unless the moves are forced -- especially after 2 or so moves (4 half moves).

second, lyudmil: you did very clearly state that 14...f4 was a winning move. ive certainly yet to see any evidence that black is even better at all.
Initially I told that black has some 30cps advantage, which could as well be 10cps, a draw, or 50cps, winning.

When I used the word winning, I wanted to emphasize how wrong top engine evals are.
yanquis1972
Posts: 1766
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 12:14 am

Re: A historical game

Post by yanquis1972 »

thanks, i see that now. im curious then, what do you estimate the correct engine evaluation of the initial position should be? -.10?
Karlo Bala
Posts: 373
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 10:17 am
Location: Novi Sad, Serbia
Full name: Karlo Balla

Re: A historical game

Post by Karlo Bala »

yanquis1972 wrote:thanks, i see that now. im curious then, what do you estimate the correct engine evaluation of the initial position should be? -.10?
I'm sorry to intrude in your thread, but the assessment of the position is that after 15..f4 white has a great advantage. Moves like h3 and Qe2 are pure waste of time. The problem is that you have too much confidence in Stockfish's evaluation.
Best Regards,
Karlo Balla Jr.