TalkChess.com

1.e3 wins, yeah, i think we had this ardy some time ago, sry...in view of the circumstance that this statement has to be one more big hoax in my REALLY honest opinion, i wonder if u might possibly be in relationship with "Lyudmil" (whom i learned to honor with time passing by)...let me give u this ...

They're thinking of sequential read operations which would cause the whole file to be transferred into physical RAM. That is an entirely different use case.

elcabesa wrote: ↑

Sun Dec 02, 2018 6:36 pm

from what I have understood e.get(i, f)->pieces[k] will store the 4 bit ( with color information ) info about the piece. so I have to mantain the color, but invert the order of pieces.

Correct.

I have to find the right points. ☺ Try this line: https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/blob/982fd9c8bce85d4cd8dca32759587d7606385e0e/src/syzygy/tbprobe.cpp#L1067 This line maps pieces in files to piece in ram? every other piece of code will access the ram rapresentation? I'll give it a t...

WDL for N pieces requires WDL for (N-1) pieces and below. Got it, thanks. What is not needed for WDL are the tables that can be reached through promotions. So if you are only interested in KRPPvKRP and only need WDL, then you must download just KRPPvKRP and all 6-piece WDL TBs (or at least those th...

elcabesa wrote: ↑

Sun Dec 02, 2018 2:07 pm

I have to find the right points. ☺

Try this line:
https://github.com/official-stockfish/S ... .cpp#L1067

BeyondCritics wrote: ↑

Sun Dec 02, 2018 4:58 pm

So you are referring to the next sentence.

Ok, we are now getting into surreal territory.

I was referring to the sentence immediately after the sentence you quoted. Obvious to me, apparently not obvious to you.

So you don't want to communicate. Fine with me. You have earned my contempt.

E.g because you suggested to subtract the raw contempt value from the root value. Do you still want to do that? What are you talking about? Even in my first explanation, I clearly pointed out that the contempt bonus was added "throughout the tree". That the contempt bonus is tapered is true, but ir...

E.g because you suggested to subtract the raw contempt value from the root value. Do you still want to do that? What are you talking about? Even in my first explanation, I clearly pointed out that the contempt bonus was added "throughout the tree". That the contempt bonus is tapered is true, but ir...

Wiggling occurs, if "contempt=both" is set. This you may call problematic or "wrong", if you like. http://talkchess.com/forum3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=68965#p779660 This is why "Off" should be the default value of Analysis Contempt (and "Both" is simply useless). And this obviously has nothing to do wi...